• Type:
  • Genre:
  • Duration:
  • Average Rating:

Movies

Review: Hunt for the Wilderpeople

Hunt for the Wilderpeople

review | Hunt for the Wilderpeople

This entertaining early effort from quirky director Taika Waititi offers a glimpse of his blockbusters to come

by Dennis Burger
updated July 18, 2023

If you want to know how Taika Waititi—a quirky independent Kiwi filmmaker previously best known for making that mockumentary about vampires and a few episodes of that TV show about a musical-comedy duo—somehow came out of nowhere and landed a gig directing Thor movies, you’ll find some answers in 2016’s Hunt for the Wilderpeople. If you’re still trying to figure out how Waititi actually managed to make a good Thor movie, when directors as celebrated as Kenneth Branagh tried the same and failed spectacularly, again, I would point you in the direction of Hunt for the Wilderpeople.

Waititi has developed a reputation for absurdity, and this hilarious film about a troubled foster child and his reluctant guardian traipsing through the New Zealand bush on the run from the law is nothing if not absurd. But who cares, really? There are any number of filmmakers out there who specialize in the absurd, and you don’t see Hollywood throwing money at them to helm blockbusters.

What makes Waititi so sought after is that he also has a knack for something Hollywood couldn’t fake if you let an infinite number of studio monkeys tug at an infinite number of heartstrings for an infinite amount of time: Sincerity. And of all his films I’ve seen to date, Hunt for the Wilderpeople is his most sincere.

A moment early on illustrates this perfectly. Little Ricky Baker, an adolescent hooligan who has bounced around the foster-care system, is first introduced to his foster mother, Bella. Her excitement is palpable and she nearly trips all over herself with excitement, which of course causes her to say and do the stupidest things possible.

In almost any other filmmaker’s hands, Bella’s nervous awkwardness would have been played for laughs at her expense. She would have been a joke to be mocked, an out-of-touch wannabe-hip parental unit portrayed in the most clichéd way possible.

And the scene is played for laughs—but not at Bella’s expense. The humor comes from the situation itself, the relatability of it all. And that makes the character’s transformation from doting foster parent into bad-ass backwoods farmer chick all the more believable. It’s a shame we don’t get to spend more time with her, because she’s really the heart of the film. But her untimely death is the fire that fuels the entire rest of the plot, which is one of the most compelling comedies-of-errors I’ve seen in ages.

I’m not really spoiling the plot here because there’s not a ton to spoil, but with Bella out of the picture, Ricky is slated to be taken back into the foster system, and as a result he runs away. Bella’s husband, Hec—who professes to have no emotional investment in the boy—follows him, and before long they’re branded as fugitives and become the targets of a highly publicized manhunt.

And that’s the story. But I’m a sucker for a simple tale, especially one this well-told. It isn’t just Waititi’s lack of cynicism that makes it work, though. It’s also his gift for pacing and most especially timing. He also knows how to let kids be kids. Ricky, played by Julian Dennison (who would go on to have a memorable turn in Deadpool 2 as Firefist), doesn’t just act like a kid and talk like a kid—he thinks like a kid. It’s one of those rare performances that shines an unflinching light on just how awful and inauthentic most portrayals of adolescents in films are.

What’s more, Dennison and Sam Neill (Hec) don’t really act like they’re in a comedy. Some of the secondary characters do, hamming it up and overperforming—not egregiously degree, but certainly in keeping with the genre. The two leads, though, play it straight. They’re both weirdos, and there’s definitely a comedy-duo dynamic between then, with Dennison playing the goof and Neill the straight man. They’re hilarious but, again, they’re not playing it up for laughs.

Wilderpeople is thematically rich for a comedy. It’s hard to watch and not be reminded of Goethe’s famous quote: “If you treat an individual as he is, he will remain how he is. But if you treat him as if he were what he ought to be and could be, he will become what he ought to be and could be.” Wilderpeople takes that one step in the other direction and plays with notions of what happens when we assume people to be criminals. And while it’s not too terribly deep, it’s certainly more food for thought than you’ll get from most slapstick romps.

Another thing that makes Wilderpeople such a joy is that it’s not nearly as predictable as most comedies. About an hour into the 100-minute runtime, anyone who’s ever seen any movie ever will have written the ending in their heads. But Waititi doesn’t go for the obvious resolution, which makes the conclusion just a bit more satisfying and a lot more humorous, though no less sweet than the ending you’ll think is coming.

One word of warning: If you’re at all sensitive to animals being harmed, or if you have kids who are, there are a couple of scenes that are more difficult to watch than Old Yeller. I wish I’d known that ahead of time.

At any rate, given the relatively recent vintage of Hunt for the Wilderpeople, it’s a little surprising it’s not available in 4K HDR. Watching it in HD via Kaleidescape, it’s evident a handful of scenes would benefit from the enhanced resolution of UHD, especially some of the landscape shots. As for HDR, though? I’m not sure it would make a huge difference. Waititi and cinematographer Lachlan Milne obviously aimed for a somewhat muted look. Blacks are never fully black and at no point do any of the brighter areas of the image come close to clipping. That gives the film a pastel look, even when colors get a bit more vibrant. Given this, I can’t help but wonder if 10-bit color and dynamic range would significantly change the look of the imagery at all.

The real question is whether the limitations of HD are in any way distracting. And the answer is a resounding and enthusiastic “No!” The film is so visually striking that you rarely have time to worry about things like pixel count and color gamut. Every shot, no matter how seemingly mundane, is framed in such a way as to be utterly engaging.  There’s nothing obtrusive about the camerawork, though, all of which is in service of the story.

I’ll admit, though, that the DTS-HD Master Audio 5.1 does get a little too clever for its own good. The mix leans a bit too heavy on the surround channels on occasion, especially in scenes where music is the predominant audio element. Ignoring those rare flubs, it’s a fantastic mix overall, full of aggressive front-soundstage panning that perfectly serves the onscreen action. Dialogue intelligibility is also topnotch, which is much appreciated given the thick Kiwi accents of most of the actors.

It’s a bit of a bummer that the Kaleidescape download lacks the supplemental material included with the Blu-ray release. (Kaleidescape isn’t alone, mind you. Vudu, Amazon, and other digital retailers also present Wilderpeople completely devoid of goodies since Apple seems to have the exclusive rights to the film’s extras in the digital domain.) I’m itching to listen to the commentary featuring Waitit, Neill, and Dennison, and I wouldn’t mind checking out the blooper reel, either. 

Really, though, Hunt for the Wilderpeople stands on its own, and is very much worth the purchase price even without supplements.

Dennis Burger is an avid Star Wars scholar, Tolkien fanatic, and Corvette enthusiast who somehow also manages to find time for technological passions including high-end audio, home automation, and video gaming. He lives in the armpit of Alabama with his wife Bethany and their four-legged child Bruno, a 75-pound American Staffordshire Terrier who thinks he’s a Pomeranian.

PICTURE | That this is an HD instead of 4K HDR presentation is never distracting. The film is so visually striking that you rarely have time to worry about things like pixel count and color gamut.

SOUND | While overall fantastic, the DTS-HD Master Audio 5.1 does get a little too clever for its own good, leaning a bit too heavy on the surround channels on occasion, especially when music is in the foreground

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

© 2023 Cineluxe LLC

Review: V for Vendetta

V for Vendetta

review | V for Vendetta

ALSO ON CINELUXE

Sign up for our monthly newsletter
to stay up to date on Cineluxe

This call for anarchy amid societal decay is eerily more relevant now than it was at the time of its release in 2005

by Dennis Burger
updated July 2, 2023

It’s been a few years since I sat down with James McTeigue’s 2005 adaptation of Alan Moore’s seminal anti-fascist comic book from the early-to-mid ‘80s—so long, in fact, that I worried as I prepared to digest the new 4K HDR release of V for Vendetta via Kaleidescape that it would feel outdated. McTeigue’s film was, after all, made in response to the second Bush administration, and by that point the comic book, although a nearly unparalleled work of sequential art, was starting to feel like a bit of an artifact, rooted as it was in the Thatcher era.

That concern couldn’t have been more off-base, and I’m not quite sure how I feel about that. I know that as an unabashed Moore devotee, I’m supposed to dismiss the film, and its script by the Wachowskis, as a toothless dilution of the anarchistic themes of the original. But the years have been kinder to the movie than the comic, to the point where the adaptation is shockingly more poignant, relevant, ominous, prophetic, and indeed instructive than its inspiration. And I say that as someone who still holds the comic in the highest regard.

My ambivalence comes mostly from the fact that when V for Vendetta was released, it seemed a little cartoonish, over-the-top, and heavy-handed in its allegory. Fast-forward to 2020—roughly the year in which the film is set—and it almost feels as if it didn’t go far enough in envisioning the dystopian near-future. It’s as if it’s plotted a course for itself that’s exactly the opposite of Marx’s observation about the repetition of historical entities: What first appeared as farce now reads like tragedy. I’ve always liked the film but I’ve never quite taken it as seriously as I now think it deserves to be taken. 

I could pick nits about the unnecessary changes the Wachowskis made in adapting the book to film, but one thing that can’t be denied is that McTeigue absolutely made the right call when he chose to embrace the cinematic form in his adaptation. Just as the comic was built on a foundation of classic literature and illustration, then pushed toward the cinematic, McTeigue builds his film on a foundation of classic cinema, then pushes it toward the comics.

It isn’t just the reliance on classic Hollywood clips and stylistic references to earlier films that firmly root this adaptation in the cinematic tradition, though. McTeigue also made the brilliant choice of casting John Hurt—whom audiences associated with his turn as Winston Smith in Michael Radford’s adaptation of 1984—as the Big Brother-like autocrat in this imagined future. This not only highlights the differences between the dystopian futures forecast by Orwell and Moore, but also serves as a subtle but effective warning about the oppressed becoming the oppressors.

Overall, V for Vendetta is an aesthetically dark film, which doesn’t leave much room for a high dynamic range grading that pushes contrasts to the extreme. But Kaleidescape’s 4K/HDR download does add a lot of richness and detail to the shadows and allows the occasional specular highlight more room to breathe without blowing out. As such, this ends up being one of the rare remasters where the increased resolution is just as impactful as the enhanced dynamic range.

Details and textures look simply spectacular in this new transfer, and although it’s unlikely V for Vendetta will make any videophile’s Top 10 list for best HDR releases of the year, cinephiles will go nuts over just how much more filmic this presentation is. The differences are subtle, but they add up to a much more faithful representation of the camera negative, from which this new transfer was sourced. This may not be the title you pull out to push your projector to its limits, but it’s the most faithful home video transfer I could imagine for V for Vendetta.

The new Dolby TrueHD Atmos remix is definitely demo-worthy. V for Vendetta has always suffered somewhat in the intelligibility department by virtue of the fact that its main protagonist wears a rigid and resonant Guy Fawkes mask over the remains of his face, and anything less than flawless fidelity makes some of his vocalizations less than distinct.

V’s alliterative and magniloquent lines have never been delivered as clearly as they are in this remix, and the film’s soundtrack—which runs the gamut from Tchaikovsky to Stan Getz & João Gilberto—has never sounded this powerful and beautifully resolved. The overhead speakers are a bit overused at times, but that probably means that most people will find the height effects perfectly appropriate. At any rate, given the choice between a slightly distracting at times Atmos mix and the muddled fidelity of the old, compressed 5.1 track, I’ll take the former any day.

I do wish the Kaleidescape download included the new bonus features added to the UHD Blu-ray release. All we get are carry-overs from the original DVD release. But no matter. V for Vendetta stands on its own, without the need for supplementation.

At least, I think it does. Watching the film now, though, I can’t help but think that audiences still haven’t completely gotten it. Yes, its iconography has been appropriated by hacker groups and the hashtag resistance. But its moral—that if you have principles and the courage of your convictions, you can win the support of the people—still struggles to break through the noise. If we don’t learn that lesson, our future will be even darker than the one portrayed herein.

Dennis Burger is an avid Star Wars scholar, Tolkien fanatic, and Corvette enthusiast who somehow also manages to find time for technological passions including high-end audio, home automation, and video gaming. He lives in the armpit of Alabama with his wife Bethany and their four-legged child Bruno, a 75-pound American Staffordshire Terrier who thinks he’s a Pomeranian.

PICTURE | Details and textures look simply spectacular in this 4K HDR transfer, and cinephiles will go nuts over just how much more filmic this presentation is

SOUND | The Dolby TrueHD Atmos remix is definitely demo-worthy, with V’s alliterative & magniloquent lines delivered clearly and the music tracks powerfully & beautifully resolved

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

© 2023 Cineluxe LLC

Review: The Addams Family

The Addams Family (1991)

review | The Addams Family

ALSO ON CINELUXE

Sign up for our monthly newsletter
to stay up to date on Cineluxe

As uneven as it is, Barry Sonnenfeld’s directorial debut remains the best take on the Addams Family to date

by Dennis Burger
updated June 1, 2023

You probably don’t need me to tell you that Barry Sonnenfeld’s 1991 riff on The Addams Family is far from a perfect film. But allow me a few minutes to convince you it’s still worth your time, especially now that it’s been restored in 4K.

I know it’s uneven and choppy, and that you can feel the absence of essential connective tissue and the presence of scenes tacked on at the last minute. There’s also the tonal inconsistency, given that the film never quite knows how far it wants to distance itself from the ’60s TV adaptation of the same comic. Sometimes it strays so close that comparisons between the two versions are inevitable (especially in its use of music from the David Levy/Donald Saltzman production), while at other times it asks for the freedom to introduce more of the macabre elements Chas Addams saw as essential to his original comics. In the latter respect, the film often goes too far.

There’s also the fact that Anjelica Huston—who certainly looks the part of Morticia—plays her part with inconsistent levels of sincerity but never quite enough. And seriously, what’s up with all the MC Hammer songs? Those have aged even worse than I could have imagined.

But it’s been 30 years since The Addams Family debuted on big screens (to put things in perspective here, only 27 years had passed between the debut of the sitcom on ABC and the premiere of the film), and I’m pleasantly surprised to find that many other aspects of this adaptation have aged much better than I remembered.

The production design, for one thing, is phenomenal. The cinematography is often fantastic (even if it’s a bit inconsistent, since the film burned through two DPs before director Sonnenfeld stepped behind the camera himself to finish the shooting). Young Christina Ricci was so fantastic as Wednesday that her portrayal has become iconic. And Raul Julia will always be the platonic ideal of everything Gomez Addams should be, despite my overwhelming preference for the ’60s sitcom otherwise, defanged as it may have been.

The Addams Family is also a lot more fun than I remember, and although one could accuse me of damning the film with faint praise, it’s infinitely better than the 2019 animated film and its 2021 sequel. What’s more, it sets up what I consider to be a vastly superior sequel: 1993’s Addams Family Values.

At any rate, the film has recently been restored and remastered in 4K under the supervision of Sonnenfeld, and if you—like I—appreciate The Addams Family despite the flaws resulting from its troubled production, you’re in for a treat. For the first time on home video, it genuinely looks like photochemical film, and all that implies. There’s an organic chaos to the imagery that’s been missing until now, and although detail and sharpness are variable from shot to shot, the image is rife with interesting and inviting textures I’ve never before seen at home. True, the enhanced resolution does no favors to the compositing work involved with most shots involving Thing, but practically every other aspect of the picture benefits from the restoration. Even the opening credits—which can often look quite dodgy on films of this vintage and budget level—positively pop off the screen. To call Kaleidescape’s presentation of this transfer an upgrade over the old Blu-ray release would be an understatement.

The audio, meanwhile, comes in the form of a DTS-HD Master Audio 5.1 soundtrack that I believe is the same as the Blu-ray release. No matter—it’s a surprisingly robust surround mix that delivers exactly the right level of immersion, with great panning and soundstaging, and just the right amount of oomph.

Unfortunately, though, Paramount has seen fit to release this 4K restoration in such a scattershot way that you have some decisions to make about how and where to purchase it. The UHD Blu-ray comes with two cuts of the film—the original theatrical edit, and a new restoration that extends the “Mamushka” dance between Gomez and Fester, which was trimmed as a result of test screenings. Despite supplying Kaleidescape with artwork pointing toward the extended “Mamushka” scene, the studio only gave the provider the theatrical cut.

They’ve also withheld the bonus features included on the disc (and, incidentally, included with most other digital releases of the film), which comprise a new introduction to the “More Mamushka!” version by Sonnenfeld, a retrospective documentary on the making of the film, and an archival featurette.

A far bigger problem is that Paramount has only given Kaleidescape an SDR transfer of the 4K remaster to work with, whereas the disc will feature an HDR10 grade and most other digital services present the film in Dolby Vision. I can’t speak to how much of a difference HDR makes in this case, as I’ve only seen the UHD/SDR transfer, but it’s still disappointing.

None of this is surprising. Paramount has a history of treating this film (and especially its sequel) quite poorly. Still, at a price of $14.99 for the new restoration, it’s hard to complain too much—especially if you’re an old fan like me. And I do emphasize the “old” part there. The Addams Family isn’t the most kid-friendly adaptation of its source material. And much like its characters, it’s erratic, occasionally incomprehensible, and a touch too mean-spirited . . . but nonetheless lovable, all things considered.

Dennis Burger is an avid Star Wars scholar, Tolkien fanatic, and Corvette enthusiast who somehow also manages to find time for technological passions including high-end audio, home automation, and video gaming. He lives in the armpit of Alabama with his wife Bethany and their four-legged child Bruno, a 75-pound American Staffordshire Terrier who thinks he’s a Pomeranian.

PICTURE | For the first time on home video, The Addams Family genuinely looks like photochemical film, and all that implies.

SOUND | The DTS-HD Master Audio 5.1 soundtrack is a surprisingly robust surround mix that delivers exactly the right level of immersion, with great panning and soundstaging, and just the right amount of oomph

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

© 2023 Cineluxe LLC

Review: Love Actually

Love Actually

review | Love Actually

ALSO ON CINELUXE

Sign up for our monthly newsletter
to stay up to date on Cineluxe

Richard Curtis’ vaguely controversial romcom-ish classic looks just fine in HD on Kaleidescape

by Dennis Burger
updated June 20, 2023

Love Actually is probably the most misunderstood of all Richard Curtis’s directorial efforts. That’s not to say it’s his best (that would be About Time by a country mile), nor is it his worst, but it seems that most people are so concerned with fitting Love Actually into their own preconceived boxes that almost no one engages with what it actually is. On the one hand, you have viewers who embrace it as the perfect romantic comedy, when in fact it’s mostly a subversion of that genre’s most saccharine trappings. On the other hand, you have the pecksniffian morality police who never resist the opportunity to tell you how much this movie fails to perfectly live up to their woke sensibilities and how you’re a bad person if you actually enjoy it because most of its characters make bad choices.

Both camps miss the point. Love Actually is hardly a rom-com. (Even the trailer gets this wrong.) It’s a comedy about love, and that’s something altogether different. It’s been accused of being a movie that has no idea what love is about, but it’s far more accurate to call it the story of people trying to figure out what love is and sometimes failing to do so.

The all-star ensemble cast is huge, and its characters run the gamut from Prime Minister of the United Kingdom to Portuguese housekeeper, but they’re all imperfectly awkward human beings doing their best to find or hold onto or comprehend love in its many forms, from childhood infatuation to forbidden obsession to meaningful intellectual connection, from platonic love to the complicated-but-undeniable bond between siblings and the developing ties between stepson and stepfather. Only a handful of the relationships in the movie have anything to do with romance. But they’re all, in their own way, about love.

It’s obvious that Curtis isn’t trying to convey any lessons here, nor is he making moral judgments (which is why I think it so offends some viewers). Love Actually is simply intended to be relatable and empathetic, both in its warmest moments and in its most fumbling, insecure, and idiotic. And it succeeds wonderfully, which makes it one of my favorite Christmas movies, whether or not it’s objectively one of the best.

And yes, it is a Christmas movie, despite arguments to the contrary. Any number of angry keyboard warriors have tried and failed to point out that the story here could have just as easily been told at or around Valentine’s Day. I think they’re confusing it with any number of half-hearted knockoffs that have followed in the 17 years since Love Actually debuted.

Of course, it’s a Christmas movie! And not merely because of the setting or the fantastic live rendition of “All I Want for Christmas Is You” at the end. It simply isn’t a traditional Christmas movie—of which Curtis is well aware, as evidenced by cheeky references to lobsters at the Nativity and so forth. Instead, it’s a story that does its best to grapple with a more modern notion of Christmas, one where the traditional extended family structure isn’t necessarily the only norm anymore.

Above all else, Love Actually is simply a sweet and sentimental, awkwardly charming good time, and one of those rare movies that’s actually best enjoyed in good company. It’s neither a masterpiece nor an affront to moral standards, but I can’t imagine letting a Christmas season pass without watching it with friends, family, or loved ones. That plants it firmly in “must own” territory.

If you don’t own it already, I would argue that Kaleidescape’s presentation is the way to go. Kaleidescape has the UK cut of the film. The only differences between the UK and US edits are in the music, but I prefer the former by a good bit. To the best of my knowledge, Universal only released the UK cut on Blu-ray in 2009, and has replaced it with the US version in subsequent rereleases, of which there have been a few.

The movie is presented in HD only, but that’s totally fine. Keen-eyed viewers will notice an overall softness to the image, but before you think this would be rectified by a 4K redux, look a little closer. Viewing the HD release at cinematic proportions, you can notice a fine grain structure that indicates plenty sufficient detail in the transfer, meaning the softness is inherent to the cinematography. There doesn’t seem to be a whole lot of additional crispness or nuance to be extracted from the negative.

Colors are bright and vibrant enough for this sort of flick, so I lean toward thinking HDR wouldn’t do it a whole heck of a lot of good, either. If you’re holding out for a 4K remaster of Love Actually, I just can’t imagine one is on the horizon. And that’s OK, since this likely isn’t a movie you dig into for the audiovisual experience. Granted, the DTS-HD Master Audio 5.1 mix does a great job of keeping dialogue clear and intelligible, and the fidelity of the soundtrack music is spot-freaking-on. In the end, that’s exactly what you would hope for.

Extras are sparse here. There’s the forgettable audio commentary track, and that’s really it. The deleted scenes from the Blu-ray are missing, but you can find those on YouTube. What really matters is that the movie itself is presented in delightfully distraction-free quality, with a full-bandwidth soundtrack and no compression issues to be seen.

If you’ve never seen Love Actually and you need a little silly and adorkable escapism this holiday season, this is well worth the price of a download. Will it change your life? No. But if you don’t find yourself guffawing through tears by the time the end credits roll, you’ve got the heart of a Grinch.

Dennis Burger is an avid Star Wars scholar, Tolkien fanatic, and Corvette enthusiast who somehow also manages to find time for technological passions including high-end audio, home automation, and video gaming. He lives in the armpit of Alabama with his wife Bethany and their four-legged child Bruno, a 75-pound American Staffordshire Terrier who thinks he’s a Pomeranian.

PICTURE | Presented in HD only, colors are bright and vibrant enough for this sort of flick and likely wouldn’t be significantly improved in a 4K HDR release

SOUND | The DTS-HD Master Audio 5.1 mix does a great job of keeping dialogue clear and intelligible, and the fidelity of the soundtrack music is spot-on

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

© 2023 Cineluxe LLC

Review: Star Trek II: The Wrath of Kahn

Wrath of Kahn

review | Star Trek II: The Wrath of Kahn

The best entry in the Star Trek film series benefits subtly from a 4K HDR upgrade

by John Sciacca
updated June 15, 2023

Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan is widely considered the best film in the original series of Trek films. It has a great villain, action, an easy-to-understand plot, and a massive shock of an ending that also set up the next film. 

Compared to Star Wars—a film that had a similar budget and that debuted three years earlier—the effects in Khan are noticeably sub-par. (And, admittedly, havent benefitted from decades of the ILM team’s reworking.) Laser blasts and photon torpedoes look like theyve just been drawn in, some of the ship flying sequences and explosions are clearly models, and one scene is very obviously on a stage with matte paintings. We also dont get nearly the stage dressing and attention to detail—just take a look at a lot of the switches and knobs aboard instrument clusters on the Enterprise and it appears they dont do anything. Of course, some of these are just byproducts of the era—and the difference of what weve come to expect from high-quality CGI—that are more noticeable now with 4Ks enhanced resolution and detail.

Filmed in 35mm, the original negative was in terrible shape” and received a 1080p remastering back in 2009 for the Blu-ray release. Theres no word that I could find about the sourcing of this 4K HDR version, but my guess is that it is taken from a 2K digital intermediate.

The big thing youll notice is how clean the images look. Right from the get-go, the opening title sequence and blackness of space just look clean and sharp. The shots in space all look especially good, with deep blacks and bright white star points. There is a fair bit of grain in the opening scenes aboard the Enterprise but that seems to be less noticeable as the film goes on, or maybe I just got used to it.

Another thing that really stood out is a pretty noticeable change in focus and sharpness in some scenes, sometimes even when cutting back and forth to two characters talking. At first, I thought it was maybe vanity defocusing to not show Shatners age but it wasnt—hes sharp and clear in some shots, and soft and diffuse in others. This is all the more noticeable because of the generally sharp edges and images throughout most of the film, with some images looking as clean and sharp as a modern production. When focus is sharp, closeups have tons of detail, revealing every line and wrinkle in Kirks face, pores in Khans chin, or the heavy facial makeup on Spock. You can also really appreciate the rich, thick burgundy felt texture of the uniform jackets worn by the Enterprise crew.

There are some bright highlights in the form of strobing lightning flashes, stars, explosions, and video screens, but where HDR really benefits is in shadow detail and just overall realistic, natural-looking images. Color gamut didnt look especially expanded, but we get some nicely saturated reds and greens.

The 4K HDR download features a 5.1-channel DTS-HD Master Audio soundtrack, which differs from the 7.1-channel Dolby TrueHD audio found on the Blu-ray disc (and Kaleidescape Blu-ray download). This mix is heavily focused on the front three channels, and definitely seems pretty undynamic by modern standards.

Audio effects like wind sounds, sirens, alarms, and explosions get a bit of width, as does James Horners score. My processors Dolby upmixer did its best to expand the soundstage, with some steam and engine sounds placed up overhead; and the Enterprise jumping to warp speed had it streak high up across the ceiling. Fortunately, dialogue is pretty clear throughout.

Time has been mostly kind to Wrath of Khan, and it certainly has never looked as good it does here. For Trek fans, this is a no-brainer—its great to revisit the original crew of the Enterprise on one of their finest adventures. But for those new to the series—and younger viewers—might be better served jumping into the new films, which are certainly heavier on the action, effects, and sonic bombast.

Probably the most experienced writer on custom installation in the industry, John Sciacca is co-owner of Custom Theater & Audio in Murrells Inlet, South Carolina, & is known for his writing for such publications as Residential Systems and Sound & Vision. Follow him on Twitter at @SciaccaTweets and at johnsciacca.com.

PICTURE | The 4K HDR upgrade results in improved shadow detail and clean, sharp, natural-looking images throughout

SOUND | The 5.1-channel DTS-HD Master Audio soundtrack is heavily focused on the front three channels and pretty undynamic by modern standards

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

© 2023 Cineluxe LLC

Review: Hellboy (2004)

Hellboy (2004)

review | Hellboy (2004)

It might not be as faithful to the comics as the 2019 remake, but del Toro’s take is by far the better movie

by Dennis Burger
updated June 10, 2023

Try as we might to be objective, the truth is that those of us who make at least part of our living reviewing films bring some significant biases to the table. So, I should likely go ahead and show my cards in this case: Im a massive fan of Mike Mignolas comic-book series Hellboy and all of its spinoffs, from B.P.R.D. to Abe Sapien to Lobster Johnson to Frankenstein Underground.

I tell you that not because it really has any bearing on the quality of Guillermo del Toros 2004 big-screen adaption of the comic, but more as a heads-up that things might get a little geekier than usual in this review. The thing is, when Hellboy hit theaters, most people had probably never heard of the comic book, and so had little concern for how faithful it was to the source.

Times have changed, though, and fandom has become more toxic across the board in almost every respect, so its become trendy to bash the movie for taking some significant liberties. Theres still no denying that in bringing the characters and mythology of the Mignolaverse to the screen, del Toro decided to adapt and interpret rather than be a slave to the printed page.

And to that I say, Thank goodness.” You only need to look at the most recent cinematic adaptation of Hellboy—Neil Marshalls unimaginative regurgitation of the comic stories Darkness Calls,” “The Wild Hunt,” and The Storm and the Fury”—for proof that translating material between two mediums isnt as simple as copying and pasting. The 2019 Hellboy reboot is truer to the storylines, dialogue, and even the overall structure of the comic than the 2004 film. But the new film, in its attempt to be a gritty R-rated gorefest, overlooks the comic books profoundly ironic humanity.

That emotional human core is exactly what del Toro latched onto it formulating his own version. And most of the deviations from the comics storyline it leans heavily on, “Seed of Destruction,” ultimately boil down to bringing themes about family to the forefront and building the rest of the story around them. This motivation results in some substantial character changes—Selma Blairs Liz Sherman, for example, bears only the most superficial resemblance to her comic-book counterpart.

A subtler deviation comes in the form of a slight genre shift. Whereas del Toros Hellboy maintains the gothic horror and action elements of its inspiration, the comics folklore underpinnings do get dropped in favor of pure fantasy. But all of these modifications work in service of Hellboy as a movie no matter what you want to say about their effect on it as an adaptation. 

For its 15th anniversary, Sony Pictures has graced Hellboy movie with a ground-up 4K restoration, which serves as the source of Kaleidescapes recent UHD/HDR release. This release proves once again that films shot on 35mm film stand to benefit more from UHD/HDR than do newer, all-digital efforts.

The imagery here is sumptuous—reference-quality in virtually every respect, with the exception of a handful of computer-generated effects that dont quite stand up to the quality of their practical counterparts. But even the worst of Hellboy 2004s CG effects look better than the best of Hellboy 2019s, so dont take this as too harsh a criticism. Overall, this new remastered transfer is simply stunning.

Unsurprisingly, the high dynamic range transfer really flexes its muscles in portraying the films shadows, of which there are plenty, although it does take the opportunity to dazzle at times. The biggest improvement over the decade-old 1080p transfer, though, is in the more refined handling of the mostly muted color palette. Though theres no denying that there’s oodles more detail onscreen here than weve ever seen on any previous home video release of Hellboy. Textures, too, get a big boost, all the way down to the fine organic grain structure of the original film elements.

Im not quite as sweet on the new Dolby Atmos remix of the movies soundtrack. But if you like tons of overhead sound effects, youll be in heaven, because the remix never misses an opportunity to employ the height channels to their fullest effect. It often does this in the interest of atmosphere, which is where this remix really worked for me. When the action cranks up, though, so do the height channels, and I found it to be a little too distracting, although thats a common complaint on my part when it comes to object-based surround sound.

The good new is, over-done though it may be, the Atmos remix is utterly seamless, and sounds exactly the way I imagine the movie would have sounded if modern audio technology had existed in 2004. The new mix maintains all the dynamic oomph that has made this movie a go-to home theater demo since the DVD days, and it does so while also maintaining excellent dialogue intelligibility and unimpeachable fidelity for the movies memorable score.

If, on the other hand, you fall into my camp when it comes to Atmos, you may be disappointed to find that the new Dolby TrueHD 7.1 surround remix available on the recent UHD Blu-ray release is missing from the Kaleidescape download. The only other soundtrack options here are low-bitrate Dolby Digital (not Plus, just Dolby Digital) 5.1, and DTS-HD Master Audio stereo.

The UHD/HDR download is also missing not one, but two new audio commentaries recorded for the theatrical cut of the movie, which is also missing here. The Kaleidescape version includes the Directors Cut only, which—to be fair—is a substantially superior cut of the movie, even if its differences mostly amount to five or six seconds of footage here and 30 or 40 seconds of footage there. Also missing is a 15th-anniversary retrospective called To Hell and Back, along with a brief new introduction by director Guillermo del Toro.

But buying the UHD version on Kaleidescape also gives you access to the Blu-ray quality download, which brings with it a cornucopia of wonderful bonus features, most notably the six-part documentary The Seeds of Creation, which at 143 minutes runs longer than the movie itself. So youre really not missing out on too much unless youre an audio commentary junky like I am.

If youre not a bonus feature completist, theres really nothing about this release to criticize. Hellboy is a fun, beautifully shot, often sweet, and utterly charming movie thats better served by this new 4K remaster than any previous home video effort. The improvements in picture quality—especially in terms of color, shadow detail, and black levels—cannot be overstated.

Dennis Burger is an avid Star Wars scholar, Tolkien fanatic, and Corvette enthusiast who somehow also manages to find time for technological passions including high-end audio, home automation, and video gaming. He lives in the armpit of Alabama with his wife Bethany and their four-legged child Bruno, a 75-pound American Staffordshire Terrier who thinks he’s a Pomeranian.

PICTURE | The imagery is sumptuous—reference-quality in virtually every respect, with the exception of a handful of computer-generated effects

SOUND | The Atmos remix is utterly seamless, and sounds exactly the movie would have sounded if modern audio technology had existed in 2004

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

© 2023 Cineluxe LLC

Review: Dora and the Lost City of Gold

Dora and the Lost City of Gold

review | Dora and the Lost City of Gold

This imaginative live-action translation of the Nickelodeon series offers an adventure-filled family night at the movies

by John Sciacca
update June 7, 2023

Based on the animated Nickelodeon series Dora the Explorer, Dora and the Lost City of Gold modernizes many of the beloved characters and puts them on a jungle adventure. My oldest daughter, Lauryn, used to watch the animated series, so I was familiar with the main characters: Dora (Isabela Merced), her cousin Diego (Jeff Wahlberg, nephew of those other Wahlbergs), Swiper the stealing fox (voiced by Benicio Del Toro), and Boots the monkey (voiced by Danny Trejo). I also knew about Doras talking Map and Backpack, whose voices are reprised by original voice actors Marc Weiner and Sasha Toro respectively.

Fortunately, you arent required to know anything about the animated series to enjoy City of Gold, but those who are will appreciate some of the clever overt and subtle nods and references to the series sprinkled throughout, such as how Dora occasionally turns to the camera and says things like, This is a golden poison frog. Can you say, severe neuro-toxicity?’” which is one of cartoon-Doras signature educational moves.

There’s a fair bit of action for a kids movie, certainly enough to keep adults entertained, but most of it is fairly tame. And while there is some peril, there are no fatalities or gunplay. Much of the adventure is Goonies-style, with rolling logs, underground water slides, and different puzzle-traps to solve. It also reminded me a bit of Lara Croft-lite, with adventuring Dora taking point and using her wits and skills to lead the group.

Both Boots and Swiper are animated in a far more cartoony style than the hyper-realistic animals featured in The Lion King (2019) but this is by design. However, a couple of other animals (namely a boa constrictor and pair of scorpions) also show their CGI-origins. The film does contain one fully animated scene, which is a great homage to the original series.

Dora on 4K HDR looks way better than any kids movie has any right to. My first note on the film was, Image is super clean and sharp.” Filmed in ArriRaw in 3.4 and 4.5K, Dora is taken from a true 4K digital intermediate, and the image quality definitely shows. Closeups reveal individual strands of hair, the texture of clothing fabric, and the detail of the jungle terrain.

Colors are also vibrant, with lots of bright yellows, greens, blues, and reds. This is especially true in the closing credits song-and-dance number, where the school student body comes together in multi-colored outfits. The bright, daytime jungle scenes also look terrific. And there are a few shots of bright fires and blazing sunsets that also benefit from the wider color gamut, as well as the brilliant, lustrous gold of statues and idols.

HDR is used throughout to deliver deep blacks, especially during the night scenes or when the gang is inside some location solving a puzzle. In one scene, they need to use sunlight and mirrors to bounce bright light around a room using reflective bowls, producing both dark blacks and piercing brightness.

Sonically, Dora also benefits from a fairly dynamic Dolby Atmos soundtrack. The jungle is filled with atmospheric sounds like birds, insects, and dripping water that immerse you in the location. During one scene, arrows whip past and overhead or thunk into walls. The sound team takes other opportunities to get creative with the sound placement, like a ringing school bell, Boots racing around the jungle treetops, water flooding the room, or voices. Bass is also appropriately deep and engaging when called for, especially during the finale at Parapata.

Dora and the Lost City of Gold makes for a fun family night at the movies—entertaining and humorous for adults (my wife especially liked the dig a pooh hole” song), without being too intense or mature for kids. Its a film younger viewers may want to visit more than once, drawn to Doras infectious charm. It also has the bonus of looking and sounding terrific in your home system, making it a real win in my book.

Probably the most experienced writer on custom installation in the industry, John Sciacca is co-owner of Custom Theater & Audio in Murrells Inlet, South Carolina, & is known for his writing for such publications as Residential Systems and Sound & Vision. Follow him on Twitter at @SciaccaTweets and at johnsciacca.com.

PICTURE | Dora on 4K HDR looks way better than a kids movie has any right to, with images that are super clean and sharp

SOUND | Dora also benefits from a fairly dynamic Dolby Atmos soundtrack, with the jungle filled with atmospheric sounds like birds, insects, and dripping water that immerse you in the location

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

© 2023 Cineluxe LLC

Review: Once Upon a Time in Hollywood

Once Upon a Time in Hollywood

review | Once Upon a Time in Hollywood

Tarantino takes a self-reflexive look at his body of work in his ninth film, which stays true to the look of its era

by Dennis Burger
updated June 5, 2023

There’s a truism about golf that focusing on your grip and overthinking your swing is the easiest way to sabotage your game. I’m not really sure how true that is because the closest I’ve ever gotten to a golfball field was the Mountasia mini-golf course that used to sit where my favorite barbecue joint now resides. But I’ve heard the same said of everything from tennis to endurance racing to sex so I’ll assume there’s some validity to it.

Given that, it’s sort of amazing Once Upon a Time in Hollywood, Quentin Tarantino’s ninth and reportedly penultimate film, isn’t an absolute swing-and-a-miss. Throughout the film’s 160-minute runtime, it’s pretty obvious Tarantino obsessed over every aspect of not just this film but his entire oeuvre, as well as every single trope that has defined his style.

I won’t dig too much into the plot for numerous reasons but suffice to say the story centers on the relationship between an actor who is past his prime and the longtime stuntman who functions as his right hand, confidant, and personal assistant of sorts. The interactions between these two—played by Leonardo DiCaprio and Bratt Pitt, who turn in some of the best work either has ever committed to the screen—form the bedrock of what could almost be described as a tone poem about the end of an era, personally, culturally, and politically. It’s a rumination on the changing landscape of Hollywood and of society as a whole at the end of the turbulent 1960s.

While DiCaprio and Pitt stand at the center of this loose tale, though, they can’t really be described as its heart. That function belongs to Margot Robbie, who positively mesmerizes as Sharon Tate, one of a number of real-world figures who populate the wholly (and I do mean wholly) fictionalized world of Tarantino’s film.

His handling of Tate as a character is honestly one of the film’s most fascinating elements. He doesn’t put her on a pedestal, objectify her, or turn her into some magical, mythical, or tragic creature. He instead humanizes her, to a degree I’ve never seen in any of the fictionalized or dramatized portrayals of her. Combined with Robbie’s pitch-perfect portrayal, this gives her a presence that feels somewhat out of proportion with her relatively limited screen time, not to mention the minuscule amount of dialogue given to her.

Once Upon a Time leans hard on a number of tried-and-true Tarantino tropes, though not always in the expected ways. As always, pop music plays a huge role in the soundtrack, though Tarantino seems less interested in digging up long-forgotten deep cuts like “Stuck in the Middle with You” or “Flowers on the Wall,” relying instead of iconic cuts that evoke the era and the personal emotions he’s exploring.

Another trope he seems to be consciously grappling with is violence. I’ll admit, I’ve never had the problem with his use of gore and splatter as some critics, if only because it’s generally so over-the-top and obviously cartoonish that there’s only the most tenuous relationship between his violence and real-world bodily harm. In Once Upon a Time though, not only is the violence massively downplayed, it’s also shockingly realistic. That combination—the overall lack of bloodshed combined with an undeniable lack of glorification or sensationalism when it does appear—honestly makes the two or three brief violent scenes the exact opposite of cartoonish. In fact, they’re so brutal as to be difficult to watch.

It seems to me this is intentional. Indeed, one of the minor recurring themes is the representation of violence in movies and TV (including Tarantino’s own previous efforts). Unsurprisingly, it’s a theme he handles with a hefty helping of Gen X irony, but the fact that he’s handling it so blatantly in the first place can’t go unnoticed.

You also can’t help but notice that Tarantino agonized over the look of the film. Shot on a combination of 8mm, 16mm, and 35mm film stock, the color portions are outright dazzling, even if the image seems to be a revolt against current digital video standards. If you’re a videophile, be prepared for some seriously crushed blacks, overly ruddy skin tones, primary colors that sizzle with near-neon intensity, and a defiant lack of dynamic range, especially on the lower end of the value scale.

I don’t say this as a criticism of the home video transfer. The Ultra HD/HDR presentation on Kaleidescape seems absolutely true to Tarantino and cinematographer Robert Richardson’s artistic vision. I’m merely giving you a heads-up that if you go in expecting near-infinite shadow detail and subtlety in the color palette, you’re going to be a bit taken aback by what you see here.

On the other hand, this is one of the few modern films that genuinely takes advantage of Ultra HD resolution, since it was finished in a 4K digital intermediate. The wider color gamut, as compared with the older HD home video standards, allows the extra intensity of those vibrant primary hues to shine through unscathed.

Interestingly, despite the overall lack of dynamic range on display, there is one very dark scene that would have benefited from the dynamic metadata of Dolby Vision HDR. I know a Dolby Vision master was created for digital cinema exhibition, although the best we have on home video is an HDR10 grade that does a wonderful job of handling the one or two rare instances of high-intensity brightness, most notably in the TV-pilot-within-a-film that comprises so much of the second act.

Overall, it’s a gorgeous film that is well-served by this home video presentation. It simply isn’t what most people would consider home theater demo material, because it has absolutely no interest in acting as such.

The lossless DTS-HD Master Audio 5.1 soundtrack accompanying the Kaleidescape download also does a wonderful job of delivering the film’s mix, which runs the gamut from safe and unobtrusive to unapologetically playful, depending on the needs of the scene. There are creative uses of the surround soundfield that will likely go unnoticed unless you’re taking notes and critiquing the mix from a technical perspective, and other, more obvious surround-sound tricks that seemingly serve Tarantino’s meta-purposes of making a film about filmmaking. But all of this really takes a backseat to what matters most: The fidelity of the soundtrack music and the intelligibility of the dialogue, both of which are unimpeachable.

For those who love some of Tarantino’s films and outright loathe or are bored to tears by others, Once Upon a Time in Hollywood is an interesting work. It isn’t perfect or consistent, but it is utterly captivating—so much so that I’ve been unable to think about much else since watching it.

Will it stand the test of time? Who knows? I will say this, though: After taking a bit more time to sort out my own thoughts on the film, I’m eager to dive back in and explore it at least one more time.

Dennis Burger is an avid Star Wars scholar, Tolkien fanatic, and Corvette enthusiast who somehow also manages to find time for technological passions including high-end audio, home automation, and video gaming. He lives in the armpit of Alabama with his wife Bethany and their four-legged child Bruno, a 75-pound American Staffordshire Terrier who thinks he’s a Pomeranian.

PICTURE | This gorgeous film is well served by Kaleidescape’s Ultra HD/HDR presentation, which seems absolutely true to what Tarantino and cinematographer Robert Richardson intended

SOUND | The DTS-HD Master Audio 5.1 soundtrack does a wonderful job of delivering the film’s mix, which runs the gamut from safe and unobtrusive to unapologetically playful, depending on the needs of the scene

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

© 2023 Cineluxe LLC

Review: Superman: The Movie

Superman: The Movie (1978)

review | Superman: The Movie

The 4K HDR release smooths down the rough edges while keeping the charm of the original, 1978 film intact

by Dennis Burger
updated June 3, 2023

Let’s talk about courage for a moment—not the courage it took for Ilya and Alexander Salkind to make a sentimental and sincere big-budget superhero film when there was no precedent for that sort of thing. Nor the courage it took for director Richard Donner and casting director Lynn Stalmaster to take a risk on unknown Christopher Reeve for the lead role, when so many other famous names were contending for the red cape and spit curl. You’ve no doubt heard those stories before.

Let’s talk instead about the courage it took for Warner Bros. to release a 4K HDR version of Superman: The Movie in 2018 that preserves all of the celluloid flaws (and charms) of the original cinematic release in an era where so many studios are glossing up, de-noising, sharpening, and generally attempting to modernize the standouts in their classic-film catalogs.

This is one of those films I buy on any new home video format the day it’s released, which isn’t to say every home video release has been a major improvement over the ones before it. This is an intentionally soft and heavily filtered film, after all. It lacks rock-solid blacks and there’s a prominent graininess to the image, especially in special-effects shots.

If Kaleidescape’s 4K HDR release weren’t true to all of that, it would be a bit of a betrayal. So why release it in 4K HDR at all? What stands out most in this release as compared with previous efforts (including the Blu-ray quality 1080p version of the film, also included with the Kaleidescape download) is the richness and saturation of its colors, especially in the early sequences in Smallville.

Before that, the scenes on Krypton also get a nice boost from the enhanced brightness afforded by HDR. I finally think I get what Donner was going for with those silly reflective suits Jor-El (Marlon Brando) and Lara (Susannah York) wear as they ponder the fate of their infant child before rocketing him off to earth. They have a pop and sizzle here they’ve never had on home video before.

Other than that, it’s as if a layer of haze has been wiped off of the film. Granted, what was buried under the haze was a late-’70s work of photochemical film. It’s fuzzy, it’s muted,and its effects shots look kinda laughable. But that’s long been part of the charm of this film, so kudos to Warner for having the cajones to release it as such, and kudos to Kaleidescape for delivering it with all of its textures and nuances intact.

This isn’t the movie you’re going to whip out if you simply want to show off all of your projector’s or TV’s pixel-pumping, high-contrast capabilities. Still, it’s hard to deny that this is the best that Superman: The Movie has ever looked or will likely ever look. I daresay the original 70mm print didn’t shine this brilliantly the first time it was spindled through the projector on opening night in 1978.

One thing worth noting is that the Kaleidescape version doesn’t include the new Atmos remix included with the UHD Blu-ray disc. I’m not sure how you feel about that, but I don’t miss it. The new DTS-HD Master Audio 5.1 mix that is included is a big step up from previous efforts, especially with its rich, bombastic delivery of John Williams’ iconic score. The fidelity here is flawless yet it isn’t an outright betrayal of the film’s original aesthetic.

Am I alone in this, though? Would you rather see a classic like Superman: The Movie presented as a product of its time, in the best possible light of today’s home video technology? Or would you prefer that the studio iron out the grain, sharpen up the edges, slap on a fresh coat of paint, and try to make the film look (and sound!) more like the current crop of superhero flicks that owe so much to this cherished classic?

Dennis Burger is an avid Star Wars scholar, Tolkien fanatic, and Corvette enthusiast who somehow also manages to find time for technological passions including high-end audio, home automation, and video gaming. He lives in the armpit of Alabama with his wife Bethany and their four-legged child Bruno, a 75-pound American Staffordshire Terrier who thinks he’s a Pomeranian.

PICTURE | The 4K HDR release preserves all of the celluloid flaws (and charms) of the original cinematic release while bringing richness, saturation, and a new vividness to the colors

SOUND | The DTS-HD Master Audio 5.1 mix is a big step up from previous efforts, especially with its rich, bombastic delivery of John Williams’ iconic score

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

© 2023 Cineluxe LLC

Review: Jumanji: The Next Level

Jumanji: The Next Level (2019)

review | Jumanji: The Next Level

This sequel mixes things up inventively from the original, resulting in a solid videogame-like adventure

by John Sciacca
update June 2, 2023

It’s really no surprise that 2017’s Jumanji: Welcome to the Jungle received the sequel greenlight. As star Jack Black, returning to portray game character Professor Shelly Oberon, quips in one of the special features, “After the first film made $900 million, I wasn’t really surprised when they called us back to do another.”

For those unfamiliar with Jumanji, these latest films are a reboot of the 1995 original, which starred Robin Williams. Jumanji is a game (of the board variety in the original, and modernized as a video game here) where players are magically and literally sucked into the game, forced to play as one of several avatars with different skill sets, and have to work together to solve problems and survive in order to complete a quest before they can exit the game back to the real world. Each character has three lives, allowing them to die (repeatedly) in a variety of usually humorous ways.

Along with Black, the rest of the Jungle quintet returns in The Next Level to reprise their roles , including Dwayne Johnson as Dr. Smolder Bravestone, Kevin Hart as Mouse Finbar, Nick Jonas as Seaplane McDonough, and Karen Gillan as Ruby Roundhouse. Jake Kasdan returns as director. Joining the crew is new character, thief extraordinaire Ming Fleetfoot, played by Awkwafina. We also get a new villain in the form of Jurgen the Brutal, played by Game of Thrones’ The Hound, Rory McCann.

Instead of rehashing the first film with a different adventure, the writers really mix things up when the game glitches, causing the avatars to be inhabited by different players. This gives the adventurers completely different personalities and allows the actors to really have fun with their roles. On top of the new adventure—to end a massive drought impacting Jumanji by recovering a magical necklace known as the Falcon Jewel, stolen by Jurgen—this new “casting” makes the film feel fresh, and provides lots of opportunities for hilarity. 

At just over two hours, Level has enough time to develop a quest that feels of videogame epic length, with enough time to travel to a variety of new environments, such as a Lawrence of Arabia-esque desert, a Moroccan-type village, and a snow-topped castle. But it never felt too long or like it was wearing out its gags, keeping me interested throughout.

Sony Pictures consistently delivers terrific home video releases, and Level continues this high standard. Shot on ArriRaw at 3.4K, images consistently look terrific, with closeups that bristle with detail and razor-sharp focus. Black wears a tweed vest that has a fine plaid print with each check clearly visible. You can also see the cracks and texture in the backgrounds and costumes, and count individual strands of hair on actors’ heads.

Blacks are deep, clean, and noise-free, and there are many nighttime and indoor scenes that benefit from the use of HDR. The night scenes in the Moroccan village of the Oasis look especially good, with brilliant neon lights along the streets, as well as warm interiors lit by candles and lamps, giving the film a natural, organic look. Interiors of the castle Fortress feature dark rooms lit by shafts of bright light or sun rays streaming through windows, and the snowy mountainside looks appropriately bright without crushing any detail.

Sonically, the Dolby Atmos track is dynamic and active, looking for nearly every opportunity to immerse you in sound. Beyond the big action scenes, there are lots of little environmental sounds like wind blowing, birds chirping, and insects buzzing. One of the recurring sonic elements is the sound of deceased players re-entering the game, with a chime that sounds overhead and has them dropping back into the game from the ceiling. Bass is also solid and weighty, whether from explosions or punches or the jungle drums that resonate from all around to indicate danger. As is typical of Dolby Atmos soundtracks, dialogue is centered and easily intelligible throughout.

Beyond a bit of swearing and some non-bloody videogame violence, Jumanji: Next Level makes a great family night at the movies, offering a plot that will keep everyone engaged and entertained, while looking and sounding great in a luxury home environment.

Probably the most experienced writer on custom installation in the industry, John Sciacca is co-owner of Custom Theater & Audio in Murrells Inlet, South Carolina, & is known for his writing for such publications as Residential Systems and Sound & Vision. Follow him on Twitter at @SciaccaTweets and at johnsciacca.com.

PICTURE | Images consistently look terrific, with closeups that bristle with detail and razor-sharp focus

SOUND | The Dolby Atmos mix is dynamic and active, looking for nearly every opportunity to immerse you in sound

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

© 2023 Cineluxe LLC

Scroll to top

sign up for our newsletter

receive a monthly recap of everything that’s new on Cineluxe