• Type:
  • Genre:
  • Duration:
  • Average Rating:

Reviews

Review: Jungle Cruise

Logo

also on Cineluxe

Kaleidescape | Jumanji: The Next Level

Sign up for our monthly newsletter
to stay up to date on Cineluxe

review | Jungle Cruise

In the tradition of Pirates of the Caribbean, the theme-park ride translates well into a family-friendly action film

by John Sciacca
updated October 6, 2023

Like Pirates of the Caribbean, the thing that makes the Jungle Cruise ride ripe for adopting into a movie is that it offers a perfect jumping-off point for any possible adventure  with the ability to weave in some nods to the ride along the way. Put some people on a boat, set them on a cruise, introduce a quest and some mayhem along the way. The thing practically writes itself! 

I went into viewing Jungle Cruise highly optimistic. Disney has been on a pretty good roll recently, having developed a solid formula for delivering big-action films that hit the right balance of humor and fun that appeals to family watching. Also, I felt Dwayne Johnson was at a point in his career that he wasn’t going to be attached to a stinker, and he’s proven that he can not only carry a big action film but deliver a deft comedic touch—see Jumanji: The Next Level—which was what a Jungle Cruise captain would need to be true to the spirit of the ride.   

The chemistry between Johnson and Emily Blunt works really well. And the opening pre-title card scene with Johnson taking a group of tourists on a jungle cruise lifts many lines and sight gags that are lifted straight from the Disneyland attraction, including the always popular “Back side of water” gag.

I wasn’t able to locate any specifications on the resolution used for filming or for the digital Iintermediate for this transfer, but my guess is that this is sourced from a 2K DI. Images are clean and sharp throughout, revealing lots of detail in closeups but just didn’t give that razor-sharp level of crispness you can get from a 4K DI, especially on long shots. Also, with the extensive amount of CGI used throughout, it would likely be in a 2K workflow.

I watched the film twice, once on my Apple 4KTV on my 4K JVC projector at 115-inch diagonal 2.35.1 aspect ratio and then again on my Xbox One S on a new Sony 65-inch OLED. What I mistook for a bit of softness in the opening scenes in a London University on the projector revealed itself to be more smokiness and haze when viewed on the OLED, but on both the colors and clarity definitely get a nice uptick when the action moves to outside.

As mentioned, closeups can have plenty of sharpness, and clean, ultra-fine detail. You can see the weave in the hats worn by characters or the texture in their clothes or the tiny squares in a screen covering a window. 

With lots of dark and lowlight scenes, Jungle Cruise certainly benefits from HDR. Whether it’s viewing characters in the warm glow of firelight or lanterns, seeing sunlight streaming through windows into dark rooms, we get lots of rich shadow detail and bright highlights. Jungle greens are rich and lush as are the vibrant reds, with several scenes with fire, along with the busses on the streets of London.

Sonically, the Disney+ version includes Dolby Atmos packed in a lossy Dolby Digital+ wrapper. Even still, there’s plenty here to find entertaining, though you’ll likely want to bump the volume 5 to 10 dB over your normal listening levels (as seems to be the case with most of Disney+ streaming). There are near constant jungle sounds when sailing down the Amazon, creating a believable canopy over your listening room, with a variety of birds squawking overhead. When scenes cut from the open outside of the Amazon, you can “feel” the change in the room, just by how it expands in the outdoors, making a really nice effect. There are also a lot of audio effects wrapping overhead and around the room from creaking vines and snakes slithering about, or a swarm of bees that flies around the room, or the splashes of water coming over the sides of the boat during a harrowing rapids ride. James Newton Howard’s score is also given a lot of room to expand throughout the room, making it much fuller sounding.

There are a few moments where the subwoofer comes into play, and these were definitely more dynamic when played through my Xbox versus my AppleTV, which just seems to compress and crush dynamics. There is a deep rumble of massive waterfalls, the explosions of a torpedo, and the low chug of the boat’s engines.

Ultimately, Jungle Cruise delivered exactly what I expected, which was a fun time with some good action, a few laughs, quality acting, some quality visual effects, and nods to one of my favorite amusement-park rides. After the dour seriousness of F9, this struck the right note of how a film can provide a night of fun and entertainment without taking itself too seriously.

Probably the most experienced writer on custom installation in the industry, John Sciacca is co-owner of Custom Theater & Audio in Murrells Inlet, South Carolina, & is known for his writing for such publications as Residential Systems and Sound & Vision. Follow him on Twitter at @SciaccaTweets and at johnsciacca.com.

PICTURE | Images are clean and sharp throughout, revealing lots of detail in closeups

SOUND | There’s plenty to find entertaining in the Atmos mix though you’ll want to bump the volume 5 to 10 dB over your normal listening levels

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

© 2023 Cineluxe LLC

The Shawshank Redemption

The Shawshank Redemption

review | The Shawshank Redemption

also on Cineluxe

Sign up for our monthly newsletter
to stay up to date on Cineluxe

The Stephen King movie for people who don’t like Stephen King movies shines brightly in this 4K HDR release

by John Sciacca
updated October 6, 2023

The Shawshank Redemption is the ultimate Stephen King movie for people that don’t think they like King, or who only associate him with supernatural tales like IT and The Shining. What writer and director Frank Darabont did right was truly understand and respect King’s source material. He trimmed where needed, tweaked where it worked better for film, but ultimately stayed incredibly true to the original story. Of course, this is easier to do when the source material is 125-pages instead of 800-plus, which is why many of King’s books just don’t adapt well to the big screen.

King has always been known for having an ear for realistic dialogue, and with much of Shawshank being character driven, with all of the important story information relayed through conversations or from Morgan Freeman’s voiceover, you needed actors who could deliver these lines convincingly. It’s impossible to imaging Red being played by anyone other than Freeman or Andy Dufresne by anyone other than Tim Robbins. Even the smaller roles are handled with aplomb, as if everyone knew this film was going to be something special and they needed to bring their A-game. 

For the rest, the 4K HDR transfer will be the definitive way to own and view this movie, with the film looking its very best. Originally shot on 35mm film, this new transfer is taken from a 4K digital intermediate. Of course, even the best film-to-4K transfers never have the ultra-sharpness of modern digitally filmed titles, but even still the image quality is mostly fantastic throughout.

Where you can most appreciate the added resolution is in closeups, where edge sharpness and facial detail is outstanding. You can see the contrast between the smoothness, fine lines, and small pores in Robbins’ face against Freeman’s more weathered skin. You can also appreciate the texture and weight of the stones, concrete, and cement throughout the prison. Clothing also really enjoys the added detail, such as the texture and fabric on the numbered patches all prisoners wear, the fine pinstripes on the prisoners’ shirts, and on Red’s hat.

As is fairly common in film-to-4K transfers, longer-range shots don’t seem to retain the sharpness and detail and look a bit softer, such as the initial scene where we fly over the prison and see the inmates scattered down below. Fortunately, much of Shawshank is filmed in close to medium shots that benefit from the 4K transfer.

There are a lot of shots in dimly lit areas such as inside the prison or even a cell, the laundry, or solitary where the lighting is often harsh, naked bulbs, and the new HDR grading helps these to have more depth and pop. The flourishes of gold on the guards’ uniforms and hats and the Warden’s cross also get a nice bit of sparkle. We can also really appreciate the many varied shades of blue in the prison uniforms.

A couple of scenes that really stood out to me were the shot outside when Andy and crew are tarring the room. Here you see the sleek, gleaming black of the tar, with the emerald green grass, and the red brick of the building with the blue-grey skies. When Hadley and Andy have their “conversation,” notice the razor-sharp edges of them as they stand over the edge of the building. Another scene was when Red and Andy were sitting outside in the yard chatting, and you could really see the sharp lines in the mortar of the walls, with tons of image depth.

This release features a new 5.1-channel DTS HD-Master mix which I would call serviceable of the material. There were certainly some scenes with ambience, such as in the laundry, or in the prison yard, or the chow hall, but for the most part audio is across the front three channels. You get a bit of expansiveness upmixed into the height speakers, expanding the soundstage of the score, as well as some of the prison PA announcements, and also making outdoor scenes sonically feel bigger and more open. There was a scene where they were unlocking inmates from their cells, and you got a nice sense of people moving around and doors opening above you. The finale’s big thunder and lightning storm also gets some nice weight in the sub channel as well as filling the room with the downpour. Ultimately, the most important audio is the dialogue, and that is well and clearly presented in the front channel.

I’m hesitant to call any movie perfect, but Shawshank is timeless and holds up every bit as well today as it when it was released in 1994. The casting, the acting, the dialogue, the pacing, and the story . . if this isn’t perfect, well, it’s damn close. Watching it again, I can’t think of anything I would change or wish they had done differently. This is highly recommended and sure to please for years to come.

Probably the most experienced writer on custom installation in the industry, John Sciacca is co-owner of Custom Theater & Audio in Murrells Inlet, South Carolina, & is known for his writing for such publications as Residential Systems and Sound & Vision. Follow him on Twitter at @SciaccaTweets and at johnsciacca.com.

PICTURE | The 4K HDR transfer will be the definitive way to own and view this movie, with the film looking its very best

SOUND | The 5.1-channel DTS HD-Master is serviceable of the material

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

© 2023 Cineluxe LLC

Review: In the Heights

also on Cineluxe

Sign up for our monthly newsletter
to stay up to date on Cineluxe

review | In the Heights

Lin-Manuel Miranda’s rookie musical gets a nice bump, thanks to Hamilton

by John Sciacca
updated October 5, 2023

While the story of Lin-Manuel Miranda’s In the Heights is in no way connected to Hamilton, you can’t help but feel the catchy beats, tempos, meter, breaks, and rat-a-tat-tat style that made Hamilton so groundbreaking were crafted and forged during his writing of In the Heights.

Miranda—likely recognizing he had aged out of playing the lead, Usnavi, but also realizing that attaching his name would give the film another level of cachet—takes on the small role of the Piragüero, a street snow-cone vendor. He doesn’t throw away his shot, making the most of his screen time.

During the lengthy opening number, “In The Heights,” Usnavi, who runs a small bodega that serves as a hub of the community, introduces us to most of the key players and tells us a bit about their story. A few big moments drive the story forward, such as several characters looking to move out of the Heights, a winning lottery ticket worth $96,000 sold at the bodega, and a blackout that shrouds the neighborhood in darkness—and heat—for a couple of days. While I was never bored—and really enjoyed many of the musical and dance numbers—at 2 hours and 22 minutes, there are slow parts and by the end it does start to feel a bit long. 

Shot at 7K, the home transfer is taken from a 4K digital intermediate, and the movie is really beautiful. Many of the scenes are shot on location in Brooklyn Heights, and the natural lighting gives the film a great look. Skin tones look natural, with loads of color and shadow detail, and a huge depth of focus.

Overall the film just looks clean, focused, and sharp throughout. The huge array of street dancers shown at the end of the opening number as well as in the community swimming pool after “96,000” are shown with great depth and clarity. Long shots showing buildings reveal tight, sharp lines of brick-and-mortar. Closeups also reveal all kinds of detail, such as in the opening number—as the camera moves through Usnavi’s store, we can clearly see every can, box, and label on the shelves. There are not a lot of effects shots, save for one big dance number (“When The Sun Goes Down”) on the side of a building. But two shots at the public swimming pool where Usnavi looks obviously green-screened in were mildly distracting. 

HDR is used to pump up the brightness of neon signs/lights in store windows, and to give the night scenes more punch. In fact, the scene/song “Blackout” would be a great demo scene, with bright flashlights, candles, sparklers, and fireworks punctuating the night. 

Even though it’s mixed and presented in Dolby Atmos, the soundtrack—at least as presented by HBO Max—doesn’t feature a lot of height information, and virtually nothing in the rear/surround back speakers, with just some music going to the side and front heights. The mix does give us some nice width and directionality across the front, letting characters and sounds move far off screen left/right as appropriate. There’s also plenty of detail to let us hear individual voices in the layered singing, letting you pick out a given singer in the sonic space. We also get some nice ambient sounds that gently fill and expand the room.

Sonically, the musical numbers are the big star here, and the instruments and vocals are given a lot of room across the front channels, with some space added in the front height and surround speakers. Many of the songs are upbeat and you can’t help but tap your toes.  

If you liked Hamilton then I daresay you’ll enjoy In the Heights too since its DNA runs thick throughout. Asking it to convert everyone into a musical lover is a big ask, but there’s no disputing that it has loads of heart and looks terrific, and is certainly worth a night in your theater.

Probably the most experienced writer on custom installation in the industry, John Sciacca is co-owner of Custom Theater & Audio in Murrells Inlet, South Carolina, & is known for his writing for such publications as Residential Systems and Sound & Vision. Follow him on Twitter at @SciaccaTweets and at johnsciacca.com.

PICTURE | The natural lighting gives the film a great look. Skin tones look natural, with loads of color and shadow detail, and a huge depth of focus

SOUND | Even though it’s mixed and presented in Dolby Atmos, the soundtrack doesn’t feature a lot of height information, and virtually nothing in the rear/surround back speakers

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

© 2023 Cineluxe LLC

Review: My Octopus Teacher

My Octopus Teacher

review | My Octopus Teacher

ALSO ON CINELUXE

Sign up for our monthly newsletter
to stay up to date on Cineluxe

This Oscar-nominated Netflix documentary is relentlessly self-obsessed but still worth watching for its nature footage

by Dennis Burger
April 6, 2021

Netflix’ My Octopus Teacher tells the story of Craig Foster, a South African director/cinematographer who, in the midst of a midlife crisis of sorts, commits to free-diving in the kelp forests near Cape Town every day to get his head together or whatever. During his dives, he quickly befriends a common octopus (Octopus vulgaris) and becomes obsessed with her life and daily habits.

Your enjoyment of the film will likely largely come down to whether or not you like Foster as a human being, because he not only narrates the film from beginning to end in the form of one continuous monologue but the footage often cuts to him sitting at a table, staring about three inches to the left of the camera, telling his tale Spalding Gray style.

He may be a perfectly fine man. I don’t know him. But he exhibits so many infuriating quirks that I found myself struggling to connect with him. He has an annoying habit shared by all emotionally distant people, in that he often refers to himself in the second person, present tense. So, “I realized” becomes “You realize,” and “I rushed to the surface as fast as I could” becomes “You rush to the surface as fast as you can.”

Far too often, when there’s the perfect opportunity to focus on the amazing underwater imagery of the octopus, we instead cut to Foster for absolutely no reason. He also almost never shuts up—except for a few shots where he stares into the camera and gulps pensively to let us know that it’s time to have an emotion. Shots that absolutely speak for themselves are narrated like a bad audio commentary from the early days of Laserdisc and DVD, when directors hadn’t figured out yet that they can occasionally stop talking if they don’t have anything interesting to say.

But those are pet peeves and don’t speak to the quality of My Octopus Teacher as a film. Here, too, I have some concerns, though. Most of the footage for this ostensibly nonfiction film was shot over the course of many months, and much of it was captured via handheld underwater cameras. In the process of stitching together a reasonably linear narrative, it’s obvious a lot of editorializing was done, which is totally fine. The problem comes from the fact that sometimes this editorializing feels far too forced.

At one point, for example, Foster’s octopus friend loses an arm in a shark attack. That in itself provides an opportunity to watch the fascinating process of her regrowing the arm over time. But since the narrative thread the filmmakers settled on centers on all the lessons Foster learned from the octopus, he of course has to concoct some hackneyed fable about how if this cephalopod could heal such a catastrophic wound, he could find a way to crawl out of his funk and hang out with his son. To call this a stretch would be to test the limits of elasticity.

About a quarter of the way into My Octopus Teacher, I really started to become distracted with the artifice of it all. And I say that as someone who is infatuated with David Attenborough’s world-spanning documentaries, many of which rely on footage that’s practically staged.

The difference is that Attenborough’s series don’t present themselves as personal journeys. My Octopus Teacher does. Foster tells the tale of his treks into the kelp forest as if no one else in the world existed, not even his family. The fact that he’s alone, that this is a solitary endeavor, is half the point of the narrative. And indeed, a lot of the best footage comes directly from his hand.

But then we’ll cut to a shot of him, underwater, holding his camera, which rightly raises the question: Wait, who’s filming that footage? There are also long top-down drone shots of Foster entering the ocean, which further undermines the integrity of the yarn he’s spinning about being oh-so-alone during this stretch of time.

So you’re probably wondering why I still recommend watching My Octopus Teacher despite all its problems. That simply comes down to the fact that Foster managed to capture some of the most compelling and fascinating footage I’ve ever seen of the daily life of an octopus. We get to see her hunting, hiding, and healing. We get to watch her study Foster as curiously as he studies her. But my favorite shot by far is a sequence in which Foster catches her playing, entertaining herself, staving off boredom. I wish he hadn’t intruded on this footage with his obvious observations about what she’s doing, because it’s clear to anyone with eyes. But there’s nearly literally nothing Foster could have done to diminish the value of this imagery.

And there are so many other shots throughout the film that have the same impact. Far too many documentaries  about cephalopods focus on animals in captivity. Here we have the opportunity to see this magnificent alien creature in her natural habitat, and I only wish I could think of a word more poignant than “revelatory” to describe my reaction to it all. 

Granted, not all of that footage is what you would describe as home-cinema reference quality. The most compelling of it is more than a bit raw, kinda dingy, questionably lit, and obscured by silt. This is interspersed with much more professionally shot footage and the aforementioned indoor interview shots of Foster. But given that so much of the video is so unpolished, it’s not surprising that Netflix’ presentation wasn’t mastered in Dolby Vision. We just get a UHD transfer with no HDR.

Still, even just a few short years ago, such a presentation would have been riddled with banding, so it’s heartening to see that Netflix has stepped up its game in terms of delivering non-HDR video. There’s one shot near the end of a setting sun that’s a bit clipped, but other than that, I didn’t spot any noteworthy video artifacts.

The Dolby Digital+ 5.1 soundtrack, meanwhile, is dominated by Foster’s narration and the sort of new-agey score we’ve come to expect from nature documentaries in this vein. There’s nothing really special about it, but it serves its purpose.

When you get right down to it, though, the soundtrack could have consisted of Gilbert Gottfried reading 50 Shades of Grey and I still would have suffered through My Octopus Teacher enthusiastically and with roughly the same level of frustration. You stick the word “octopus” in the title of a documentary and I’m going to watch it, just on the off chance of seeing these enigmatic beings behaving in mysterious ways I’ve never witnessed before. This one delivers on that in spades, and I imagine I’ll be watching it again sometime very soon. The next time I do, though, I think I might mute the soundtrack and cue up Pink Floyd’s Meddle on a loop in the background instead.

Dennis Burger is an avid Star Wars scholar, Tolkien fanatic, and Corvette enthusiast who somehow also manages to find time for technological passions including high-end audio, home automation, and video gaming. He lives in the armpit of Alabama with his wife Bethany and their four-legged child Bruno, a 75-pound American Staffordshire Terrier who thinks he’s a Pomeranian.

PICTURE | Aside from a shot near the end of a setting sun that’s a bit clipped, the UHD presentation, sans HDR, exhibits no noteworthy artifacts 

SOUND | The purely utilitarian Dolby Digital+ 5.1 soundtrack is dominated by narration and the sort of new-agey score we’ve come to expect from nature documentaries in this vein.

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

© 2023 Cineluxe LLC

Review: Marriage Story

Marriage Story

review | Marriage Story

ALSO ON CINELUXE

Sign up for our monthly newsletter
to stay up to date on Cineluxe

The Oscar-nominated Netflix drama turns out to be a deft character study

by Dennis Burger
January 9, 2020

I’m almost ashamed to admit that this year’s Golden Globes played some part in my awareness of Noah Baumbach’s new Netflix-original film Marriage Storyashamed because I couldn’t care less about awards ceremonies and rarely base any of my viewing habits on self-congratulatory pomp. I do, on the other hand, care quite a bit about Baumbach’s work. And I’m drawn to him, in part, because his films aren’t predictable. While I’ve loved all of his collaborations with Wes Anderson (especially the delightful Fantastic Mr. Fox), his own directorial efforts have been a little more uneven. For every engaging The Squid and the Whale, there’s been an off-putting Margot at the Wedding. For every mercurial Frances Ha, there’s been a muddled While We’re Young.

But even Baumbach’s failures have been noble failures because he has a singular talent for writing dialogue that’s simply unmatched in our generation. And all of that is on full display in what I consider to be one of his best yet.

Marriage Story stars Scarlett Johansson and Adam Driver as soulmates at an impasse. It’s ostensibly the story of their divorce, territory Baumbach already explored from one perspective in The Squid and the Whale. But to call it a film about divorce would be to miss the point. Instead, it’s about the individual sense of identity that’s often lost in any marriage, but also the intimacy that’s gained in return. That back and forth, give and take, yin and yang ultimately influences all of the film’s themes.

It really isn’t the thematic or narrative heart of Marriage Story that makes it work, though. It’s the characters that drive the film, as well as Baumbach’s gift for crafting dialogue that sounds completely organic and natural to the ear but upon closer inspection turns out to be a masterfully assembled jigsaw puzzle conglomerated from pieces pilfered from two different boxes.

Characters talk past and over one another, they inject non sequiturs and distractions, they leave thoughts dangling and stumble over interruptions, and if you didn’t know better you might suspect that Baumbach is allowing his performers to improvise. He’s not. Every pause, ever “uh,” every clipped and broken sentence fragment is meticulously scripted to keep the flow of what’s actually being communicated between two characters who aren’t really listening to one another unambiguous for the viewer.

It helps, of course, that the film is perfectly cast. It’s seems clear to me that Baumbach selected Johansson and Driver not merely because of their talent, but as much for the audience’s expectations of what they bring to a film. With Johansson, we expect a certain emotional complexity—an ability to convey two contradictory emotions on her face, in her body language, in her vocal inflections. With Driver, we expect a certain caged-animal ferocity—explosions of intensity and frustrated vulnerability. Baumbach plays around with those expectations in wonderful ways, and I hesitate to say more than that.

The one thing I will say about characterization, though, is that Baumbach seems to be going for more universal relatability with this film than with previous efforts. Much as I love his last Netflix original, The Meyerowitz Stories (New and Selected), I’ll admit that as with most of his films, I found its neurotic characters as unrelatable as they were fascinating. It could simply be that I’m from Alabama, where—to paraphrase Julia Sugarbaker—we proudly display our crazy out in the open rather than bottling it up until it boils over, but there’s always been an aloof affectation to Baumbach’s characters that made them seem more than a little alien to me.

That’s far from the case with Marriage Story, save for a few supporting characters whose affectations are more of a contrived West Coast sort that I at least understand. At its heart, though, the two leads are less defined by their neuroses than by their sympathetic human failings.

If all of the above makes Marriage Story seem like the sort of film that could just as easily be viewed on a laptop or mobile screen, that couldn’t be further from the truth. Cinematographer Robbie Ryan gives the characters room to breathe, opting for wide shots throughout except when closeups are needed for punctuation. It’s a film that begs to be seen on the largest screen in the home, and one that rewards quality of presentation thanks largely to its distinctive, filmic look.

Shot on Kodak Vision3 200T and 500T film stock in an increasingly uncommon 1.66:1 aspect ratio, Marriage Story is an analog cinephile’s dream. The organic grain structure and photochemical idiosyncrasies of the film stock give the film a unique character that’s missing from so many modern, digitally captured movies.

What surprised me, though, is that Netflix’ UHD/HDR presentation—at least by way of my Roku Ultra—is more than up to the task of delivering this unabashedly analog imagery pretty much perfectly intact. Much as I love this modern era of high-efficiency, relatively low-bitrate streaming, I’m not blind to its limitations. One expects a few seconds here and a few seconds there with a little light banding or digital noise. Indeed, there is a handful of shots in Marriage Story—one in particular featuring characters positioned against an inconsistently lit cream-white wall—where I leaned forward to judge just how prominent the banding would be. And yet I saw none.

Ask me to find a visual flaw in the presentation and I might point to one scene in which the structure of the film grain and the textures of an onscreen object interfere a little and may have been presented a little less noisily in a much higher bandwidth download or on disc. But without being able to do direct A/B comparisons, I’m just guessing.

That aside, Netflix presents Marriage Story beautifully, preserving the slight golden cast of the film stock, as well as its overall low-contrast aesthetic. It’s important not to confuse contrast and dynamic range here, as the HDR does leave a lot of room between the not-very-black blacks and the never-very-intense highlights, allowing us to peer deeper into shadows and appreciate the subtle differences between, for example, two black pieces of clothing dyed differently and aged asymmetrically.

The sound mix also hinges on subtleties. Mostly mono, the barely-surround soundtrack makes another strong case for why the center channel is the most important speaker in your sound system. The mix does spread to the front left and right speakers occasionally, mostly to give width to Randy Newman’s sparse-but-poignant score, but also, creatively, to give some space to the often dense and chaotic cacophony of dialogue.

Netflix, it seems, is somewhat under siege as of late, with some criticizing the inconsistent quality of its original offerings and others (yours truly included) musing on how the service can maintain any semblance of identity in the face of new competitors like Disney+ and the upcoming HBO MAX and Peacock.

If the company keeps supporting the creation of films like this, though, it can count on my $15.99 every month. And if Noah Baumbach is going to keep maturing as a filmmaker and delivering consistently amazing character studies like The Meyerowitz Stories and now Marriage Story, he’s going to convert me into an unapologetic and unreserved champion.

Dennis Burger is an avid Star Wars scholar, Tolkien fanatic, and Corvette enthusiast who somehow also manages to find time for technological passions including high-end audio, home automation, and video gaming. He lives in the armpit of Alabama with his wife Bethany and their four-legged child Bruno, a 75-pound American Staffordshire Terrier who thinks he’s a Pomeranian.

PICTURE | Netflix’ UHD/HDR presentation is more than up to the task of delivering the movie’s unabashedly analog imagery pretty much perfectly intact

SOUND | Hinging on subtleties, the mostly mono soundtrack makes another strong case for why the center channel is the most important speaker in your sound system

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

© 2023 Cineluxe LLC

Review: The Snoopy Show

ALSO ON CINELUXE

Sign up for our monthly newsletter
to stay up to date on Cineluxe

review | The Snoopy Show

This Apple TV+ series manages to capture the spirit of the best of the early Peanuts special while giving the material a spin of its own

by Dennis Burger
February 16, 2021

One of the things I love about Roku is the ability to quickly and easily customize its home screen. Find yourself watching content from one app more than any other? Just click the asterisk and move it closer to the top of the screen. Left cold by the offerings of another streaming service? Bump it down in the list, perhaps to Page Two or three. It seems a little trivial, but I use the arrangement of apps as a metric for deciding whether or not to cancel streaming subscriptions. If I have to scroll down past the topmost three and a half rows of icons to get to an app, that app is no longer worth paying for.

I only mention that because, after having watched The Snoopy Show, Apple TV+ has moved up from the precarious ninth position (right near the bottom of the screen at bootup) and is now resting more comfortably on the second row of icons, just below YouTube, Netflix, and Disney+.

Not to put too fine a point on it but The Snoopy Show is better than it has any right to be. And if that seems a little harsh, think back to when you first heard that Apple would be producing new Peanuts animated specials. Was your initial reaction even slightly hopeful? If so, I wish I could bottle your optimism.

But maybe I’m just jaded. Thanks to Ronald Reagan’s reign of deregulation, I grew up in the era of cartoons as commercials, when every 22-minute animated romp—whether it aired on Saturday mornings or after school—was trying to sell me all manner of things I immediately begged my parents to buy. Robots in Disguise. Real American Heroes. Whatever M.A.S.K. was about. And, in the case of The Peanuts, Dolly Madison snacks, Coke, and Mickey D’s. (Although, to be fair, that last one wasn’t Reagan’s fault—that was true from the giddy-up.)

We’re in the midst of something of a cartoon renaissance, though. Kids today (and yes, it hurts my soul to type those words) have an embarrassment of legitimately good, kid-friendly, non-propagandist episodic animation to devour, from Steven Universe to Craig of the Creek to Hilda and Infinity Train, and it’s only been a couple of years since Adventure Time ended its run as one of the hands-down best TV series of the past 50 years.

Given that this is the environment The Snoopy Show is parachuting into, perhaps my expectations should have been a little higher. But I’m still honestly shocked that the creative talents behind this new Apple-exclusive series have put so much effort into making it so darned good.

Its virtues begin with its animation, which is both an homage to the classic Peanuts animated specials and a loving upgrade of their style. The characters themselves seem pulled straight from Sparky Schulz’s pen, and although the foreground animation has been giving a big boost (both in draftsmanship and resolution), there’s still something incredibly comfortable about the way Charlie Brown and Snoopy and the gang are animated. The herky-jerky, overly dramatic body language for which everyone’s favorite cartoon beagle is known translates beautifully into this new world of cartoons.

The background art, meanwhile, is a whole new ballgame. The canvas upon which these little animated adventures take place is of a quality quite unlike anything we saw in Peanuts specials of yore. There’s some Looney Tunes influence, for sure, especially in the way the background artists play with abstractions and intentional registration errors. There’s also some obvious homage to the earliest Peanuts Sunday strips, before everything got simplified down to flat secondary colors. The Dolby Vision presentation of The Snoopy Show, while not expansive in its luminance, gives the gradience and shading of the backgrounds plenty of room to breathe without banding.

But what impresses me most about the imagery is that the background artists have cobbled their influences and inspiration into something unique, with a character of its own, and of a quality you just don’t expect to see outside of feature-length animation.

It’s a shame that the same can’t be said of the music. Composer Jeff Morrow seems content to play a poor-man’s Vince Guaraldi here, aping the musical style of the old animated specials without taking any risks. Classics like “Linus and Lucy” may seem in hindsight to be an essential element of the Peanuts, but it’s important to remember that laying down a jazz soundtrack for A Charlie Brown Christmas was a creative risk at the time. The studio suits thought it would never fly. So while Morrow’s soundtrack feels comfortable, and is incredibly well-recorded and mixed, it’s not really true to the spirit of what Guaraldi and producer Lee Mendelson were aiming for with the music of that original special and its increasingly less-interesting followups.

That’s really the only bummer of note here. I could also grumble about the fact that some of the Peanuts gang have been voiced by actors who fail to capture the old-soul timbre I associate with the characters, but that’s more of an observation than a criticism, and the humans are really the secondary characters here. As its name implies, The Snoopy Show is about Charlie Brown’s canine companion, not Charlie Brown himself. And the focus on Snoopy (and Woodstock) results in a genuinely chaotic vibe I just love to pieces.

Yes, the show still captures the existentialism inherent to The Peanuts (and in that respect, it hews closer to the comic strip than previous animated efforts), but given the rich imagination for which Snoopy is known, and the fantasy worlds he famously inhabits, the shift in focus away from the human gang and toward the pup results in a commensurate shift toward the whimsical and downright weird.

As such, there isn’t always a clearly defined narrative arc to the three eight-minute vignettes that make up each episode, nor is there any continuity between them. Each is its own little universe. One entire short is dedicated to Snoopy trying to cool off on a hot day. Another is entirely about his spastic and unselfconscious dancing. The latter, by the way, is one of the few vignettes to have any sort of overt moral, but it echoes the more covert ideology that permeates the series so far: Life may suck sometimes, but it’s a lot more bearable if we choose to actively rebel against the darkness and embrace the goodness and joy and goofiness in the world.

That may not be profound but it’s true to Schulz’s creation, and it gives The Snoopy Show a timeless quality that’s rare, even in this new golden age of children’s animated programming. It also means that the series isn’t insufferable when viewed through adult eyes. This is one of those rare shows parents might actually enjoy just as much as their little ones.

And that’s not purely a function of nostalgia. Part of it is the fact that the show never panders to anyone. There’s some stuff here that will fly straight over the heads of anyone under 10, but that’s okay. There’s certainly nothing inappropriate for such young eyes and ears. I just can’t imagine our young niece laughing at the same things that made my wife and me chortle.

Will you enjoy it as much as we did? I can’t say for sure. The missus and I are both overgrown kids and weirdos to boot. But I hope you do. Because as fanciful (and mischievous!) as it is, the world needs more cartoons like The Snoopy Show.

Dennis Burger is an avid Star Wars scholar, Tolkien fanatic, and Corvette enthusiast who somehow also manages to find time for technological passions including high-end audio, home automation, and video gaming. He lives in the armpit of Alabama with his wife Bethany and their four-legged child Bruno, a 75-pound American Staffordshire Terrier who thinks he’s a Pomeranian.

PICTURE | The Dolby Vision presentation, while not expansive in its luminance, gives the gradience and shading of the backgrounds plenty of room to breathe without banding

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

© 2023 Cineluxe LLC

Review: The Social Dilemma

ALSO ON CINELUXE

Sign up for our monthly newsletter
to stay up to date on Cineluxe

review | The Social Dilemma

This Netflix docudrama on the dangers of social media is so eager to please it nearly undermines its own arguments

by Dennis Burger
September 14, 2020

Netflix’ The Social Dilemma is one of the most frustrating viewing experiences I’ve had in ages—frustrating because it has a really important message to convey, but sometimes undermines that message with cutesy animation and heavy-handed musical accompaniment. It’s also frustrating because it wants to be equal parts documentary and drama, but fails in the latter respect. And it’s frustrating because I wanted to write it off entirely but ended up being won over despite my better judgment. But most of all, it’s frustrating because it relies on some of the same tactics it decries.

As you could probably ascertain from its title, The Social Dilemma is about the dual-edged sword of social media and the impact it’s having on society. What makes the documentary aspect of the film work as well as it does is the reliance on Silicon Valley experts like Tristan Harris and Aza Raskin, who helped create the very tools that they’re now warning us about.

Harris—co-founder of the Center for Humane Technology and the “closest thing Silicon Valley has to a conscience,” according to The Atlantic—dominates the film with a series of cogent explanations about how the algorithms that drive everything from Google searches to Facebook interactions work. On the upside, he’s given a lot more room to breathe here than in his famous TED Talk on the subject, allowing him to connect some dots I’ve never seen connected before, at least not in the way they’re connected here.

But for every illuminating observation from Harris, The Social Dilemma feels compelled to spoon-feed the viewer a disjointed dramatic narrative that feels like the mutant child of an ABC Afterschool Special and one of those awful Chick Tracts that used to litter the gutters of New Orleans.

It’s in these dramatizations that The Social Dilemma commits its greatest sin: Assuming the stupidity of the viewer. The story here is about a family whose two youngest children are being harmed by social media—one child whose entire sense of self-worth is based on “Likes” in response to photos she posts, the other who ends up sliding down the slippery slope of fake news and becoming radicalized.

Handled well, I suppose it could have worked. But in attempting to explain how the algorithms that encourage engagement trap users in a dopamine-driven feedback loop, the filmmakers decided to anthropomorphize these algorithms and give them dialogue, à la a twisted techie version of Pixar’s Inside Out.

This takes what is genuinely a malignant phenomenon and turns it into a seemingly malicious one, which undermines a lot of the film’s messaging. It also directly contradicts the views of the experts, who do a much better job of explaining the nuances of these wholly impersonal algorithms and the way they manipulate users to generate revenue, engagement, and growth. But nuance doesn’t suffice these days, I suppose, so we end up with these wholly unnecessary abstract dramatizations that do little more than confuse the uninitiated and drag down the film.

By the time its closing credits rolled, though, The Social Dilemma won be back with a well-developed conclusion that cuts straight to the heart of the divisiveness, anxiety, depression, suicide, social upheaval, and general discord sowed by social media—as well as some of the upsides of this technology. I wish some of this balance had been sprinkled more evenly through the rest of the film, because we can’t have an honest conversation about the impact of social media without covering the good as well as the bad (although, full disclosure: I’m a little biased in this respect since Facebook was responsible for my reunion with my daughter).

If the entire 94-minute running time of The Social Dilemma had lived up to the quality of the last 10 minutes or so, it would be much easier to recommend. But I’m left with a dilemma of my own here, because I think the message of the film is so important that you should view it despite its flaws. Just go in armed with the knowledge that director Jeff Orlowski employs some of the same psychological sleight-of-hand the film warns us about.

As for the presentation of the film itself, Netflix delivers The Social Dilemma in Ultra HD without HDR10 or Dolby Vision high dynamic range. As soon as I noticed this, I deliberately kept an eye out for the sort of visual artifacts inherent in high-efficiency streaming without HDR—banding, crushed blacks, poor shadow detail, etc. Surprisingly, I couldn’t see them, which makes me think Netflix may be employing a higher-than-usual bitrate for the film, but I’m just speculating. Whatever the explanation, it points to the fact that streaming services are constantly evolving in terms of quality of presentation. Even just a couple years ago, Netflix would have had to stick this SDR film in an HDR container to deliver a stream this artifact-free.

The Dolby Digital+ 5.1 soundtrack has a lot of overbearing sound effects and a generally doom-and-gloom score that could have easily gotten out of hand with the wrong sound mixer. Thankfully, it’s a mostly front-channel affair, and dialogue clarity is topnotch. It should sound fine whether you’re watching on a full-fledged home cinema system or a simple soundbar.

Again, I’m of two minds here: I want you to watch The Social Dilemma, but I also want you to know what you’re getting into. It’s a significantly flawed film, but it’s also an important one. If the hypnotic animation and ham-fisted dramatizations are too much for you to stomach, though, I highly recommend watching Tristan Harris’ TED Talk instead. It doesn’t connect the dots nearly as effectively as does The Social Dilemma, and it isn’t nearly as well-produced, but it also isn’t burdened by all the saccharine fluff that mires this docudrama.

Dennis Burger is an avid Star Wars scholar, Tolkien fanatic, and Corvette enthusiast who somehow also manages to find time for technological passions including high-end audio, home automation, and video gaming. He lives in the armpit of Alabama with his wife Bethany and their four-legged child Bruno, a 75-pound American Staffordshire Terrier who thinks he’s a Pomeranian.

PICTURE |  Netflix delivers The Social Dilemma in UHD without HDR10 or Dolby Vision high dynamic range and yet the presentation is artifact-free

SOUND | Mostly a front-channel affair with topnotch dialogue clarity, the Dolby Digital+ 5.1 soundtrack should sound fine whether you’re watching on a full-fledged home cinema system or a simple soundbar

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

© 2023 Cineluxe LLC

Review: The King of Staten Island

The King of Staten Island

review | The King of Staten Island

also on Cineluxe

Sign up for our monthly newsletter
to stay up to date on Cineluxe

Attempting to capture the aimlessness, absurdity, and grunge of the underclass, Judd Apatow utterly misses the mark

by Michael Gaughn
January 27, 2020

I know that people like the characters in The King of Staten Island exist but I don’t like paying to be reminded of that fact, especially over a grueling two hours and 17 minutes. I felt the same revulsion watching American Factory, another grisly reminder of the underclass spawned by successive generations of callous, punitive economics and an increasingly toxic pop culture. Yes, this is who we’ve become, but it’s nothing to be proud of.

I can’t imagine what kept Apatow motivated through the protracted process of developing, writing, shooting, and doing post on something this pointless. When he sat down every morning, what did he see in this dung heap that gave him the energy to carry on?

The answer may lie with the Apatow house brand—which is something distinctly different from his style as a filmmaker, which I’ll get to it a minute. Imagine Freaks & Greeks grafted onto Buñuel’s Los olividados, and you’ll have some idea of where he was trying to go with Staten Island. And that could have potentially been fertile ground. Problem is he couldn’t resist the impulse to apply his patented warm and fuzzy formula in an effort to redeem his irredeemable characters, so what starts out like Trainspotting ends up a lot like It’s a Wonderful Life. The former rings true, but something nobody really needs to be exposed to; the latter is just nauseating.

His distinctive style has been apparent from his earliest directorial efforts. (Even a casual observer can see the clear through-line from the freeze-pop scene in Freaks & Geeks to Staten Island.) And his work has the potential of being tremendously expressive—if he can ever find the right material. The problem is, Freaks remains his strongest effort to date, aside from some occasional moments in 40 Year Old Virgin and This is 40. Whenever he’s tried to bring some discipline to his work and act more like a “filmmaker,” like with Knocked Up, the egregious Funny People, and here, he always goes seriously awry. But he’s definitely onto something, and might actually somehow someday get far enough out of his own way to latch onto a more promising subject.

Staten Island was supposed to have had a limited theatrical run, mainly at drive-ins, but Universal at the last minute decided to send it straight to video. My guess is they couldn’t figure out who the audience was supposed to be and were afraid it would flop hard even at a time when people are starved for entertainment.

But premium video on demand wasn’t such a great alternative. I had to fork over 19 bucks to watch this on Amazon—that’s a hefty amount to wager on a film that doesn’t give you much of  a clue of what you’re in for. The bigger problem is that you can be halfway through the seemingly interminable slog of watching it and still not have a clue.

I know it’s heresy to bring this up at a time when every film sprawls and nobody has the creative discipline, or a strong enough sense of mercy, to cut anything to the length it actually deserves, but Staten Island could have easily been a nice, tight 90 minutes and still have been, for better or worse, the same film. At least I would have gotten 45 minutes of my life back.

I don’t have much to say about the acting except that, if you’ve ever seen an Apatow film, you’re seen all of these performances before. And there’s the recurring problem of nepotism. What has to happen to keep Apatow from casting his own family members? His daughter Maude is OK as Pete Davidson’s responsible, grounded, empathetic (insert morally laudable trait here: _____) sister, but is in no way exceptional and is a kind of poster child for the daughters of privilege swelling the acting ranks in New York and LA, people with only modest abilities but terrific connections.

There’s nothing exceptional happening on the technical side either. Staten Island is shot in the standard-issue faux documentary, “independent film” style that’s been dragging down serious films for at least a decade now. (Did I mention that this isn’t really a comedy?) Everything is well enough shot and assembled, but this could have been presented as a radio play with pretty much the same impact. Part of the almost $20 price of admission can be attributed to Staten Island being a 4K HDR release, but I couldn’t see where that really helped or hindered anything.

The audio is perfectly serviceable, and can’t be held accountable for the unpleasant accents and some of the actors’ inability to articulate their lines. There are the obligatory pop-music cues meant to create a false sense of energy, and some firearms are discharged during a robbery scene. I guess the gunshots sound realistic. I’m kind of glad to say I have no way of knowing for sure.

Maybe this thing panders just enough to have an audience beyond self-pitying brats. God only knows Staten Island embodies the corrosive masochism that lies at the black heart of the culture. I just know that trying make our dance with Thanatos more palatable by turning it into something that veers awful close to becoming a musical isn’t healthy for anybody. If you really feel like you really need to piss away $20 online, go play some poker instead.

Michael Gaughn—The Absolute Sound, The Perfect Vision, Wideband, Stereo Review, Sound & Vision, The Rayva Roundtablemarketing, product design, some theater designs, a couple TV shows, some commercials, and now this.

PICTURE | Shot in standard-issue faux documentary, “independent film” style, it’s hard to see where 4K HDR brings anything to the proceedings

SOUND | The audio is perfectly serviceable and can’t be held accountable for the unpleasant accents and some of the actors’ inability to articulate their lines

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

© 2023 Cineluxe LLC

Review: Space Force

Space Force

review | Space Force

also on Cineluxe

Sign up for our monthly newsletter
to stay up to date on Cineluxe

Netflix’ blatant and desperate attempt to try to salvage some of its Office audience results in a sitcom that manages to fire on no cylinders

by Michael Gaughn
June 6, 2020

It’s not hard to figure out how this all began. Netflix had an unexpected boon when Millennials didn’t discover The Office until after it had migrated over to the subscription service, but then seized on and devoured it as if they’d just summoned up manna. But then, as part of the seemingly endless proliferation of streaming providers, NBC decided to launch Peacock and bring The Office back under its wing, depriving Netflix of what is probably its steadiest flow of viewers.

While they would never publicly admit it, Netflix suddenly found itself desperate for a new series that looked, walked, and smelled enough like The Office to retain a sizable portion of that show’s audience.

Enter Office creator Greg Daniels and star Steve Carell with the idea for a service comedy—an idea as old as the hills (or at least as old as Aristophanes)—and as current as today’s headlines. Or at least that’s how they would have presented it at the pitch meeting—assuming they even had to do a pitch before Netflix handed them a blank check.

To cut right to the chase, Space Force is nothing but a mess, way overinflated in every possible way, the most hackneyed of sitcom premises puffed up with a stupidly large budget and a random mob of a cast. If this had been made for a fraction of the money and with a little less latitude, the constraints might have brought some badly needed discipline to the exercise, yielding something tighter, funnier, and more watchable. Maybe.

What we have instead is the Netflix equivalent of It’s a Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World—a too-big-to-fail comedy that puts a gun to your head and tells you to laugh because it’s desperate to justify its existence. There are some laughs, occasionally (I have to admit to falling for the space chimp bit), but far too rarely. Space Force is the sitcom equivalent of spending an evening watching a room full of monkeys perched at typewriters and waiting for one of them to randomly tap out a joke.

To go with another animal analogy, it’s a great, big slobbering Labrador of a show, utterly superficial, with no ideas or convictions of its own, desperately trying to please everybody and willing to do anything to get a little attention. If you’ve heard that it’s a spoof or satire, you heard wrong. Space Force doesn’t bite—it licks your face instead. It doesn’t have the creative courage to skewer a damn thing.

But enough generalities; let’s talk specifics. You get the sense Carell loves The Great Santini and decided, for some reason, to drag it into the present. But it would be hard to name another actor more different from Carell, with his extremely limited acting range, than Robert Duvall. That cognitive dissonance might help explain why Carrel can’t get a bead on his character but constantly shifts between playing a pint-sized general, Michael Scott, and an ambiguous third being who might actually be Carell himself.

The cast is big and, almost without exception, unexceptional, the most offensive member being Ben Schwartz as Carell’s media manager. His every moment on screen is the comedy equivalent of waterboarding. Carell’s character fires him in the first episode, which seemed logical and felt definitive, and led to the hope we were rid of him forever. But this is a cliché-laden sitcom after all, so he keeps arbitrarily popping back up throughout the series, like a horror-movie villain or a rodent, even though his shtick is predictable, his actions implausible, and he fails to generate any laughs.

The biggest offense—although you can’t really blame the completely bland, inoffensive actress saddled with playing her—is the pilot who starts out as Carrel’s whirlybird chauffeur and somehow ends up commanding a lunar mission. She’s not a character or the product of a legitimate creative act but a fashionable amalgam, born of checking off a bunch of boxes meant to suck up to contemporary sensibilities. As far as you can get from three-dimensional, she’s a direct descendant of the personified virtues in a medieval morality play.

More specifically, she’s only there to be the token tough-but-caring black girl who rises to a level of great responsibility because she has a massive father complex.

If there’s any glimmer of light in this black hole of a series, it’s John Malkovich as the lead scientist. He’s ultimately nothing but a stereotypically affected straw man, Alice to Carell’s Ralph, Felix to his Oscar. It’s only Malkovich’s ability to make something out of nothing that causes his screen time to add up to anything resembling creative redemption.

Pardon a little inside baseball, but I watched Space Force straight through when it debuted and planned to publish this review then. But my reaction was so strong, I felt the need to buy some distance before going public with my thoughts. Unfortunately, the weeks that have lapsed since have only reinforced my original impressions.

If you’re big on Anointed vs. Underclass fictions that come down firmly for the Anointed, this show is for you. If you find succor in a day-care center view of the world, then you’ll probably actually enjoy the image of a military mission jubilantly jumping around the lunar surface like a bunch of infants. I didn’t. Space Force shows how far we’ve devolved since Metropolis, and suggests the Fredersens of the world have irrevocably won.

Michael Gaughn—The Absolute Sound, The Perfect Vision, Wideband, Stereo Review, Sound & Vision, The Rayva Roundtablemarketing, product design, some theater designs, a couple TV shows, some commercials, and now this.

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

© 2023 Cineluxe LLC

Review: The Bad Batch

ALSO ON CINELUXE

Sign up for our monthly newsletter
to stay up to date on Cineluxe

review | The Bad Batch

These animated series is not only a successful Star Wars spinoff but an audiovisual treat as well

by Dennis Burger
May 11, 2021

Beginnings definitely aren’t Dave Filoni’s strong suit. As much as I’ve raved about his efforts on Star Wars: The Clone Wars, that show took at least a season to find its footing. The followup, Rebels, also went through an awkward adolescence before developing into another incredible series—seriously some of the best Star Wars storytelling in the Disney era.

As the architect of the galaxy far, far away in the animated domain, Filoni puts a lot of faith in his audience’s ability to invest in a long game, but the flipside is that we in the audience have to put a lot of faith in him, to trust that things will pay off in the end. And they always do, at least so far. What, then, to make of the fact that The Bad Batch, the latest Star Wars series to spin from Filoni’s mind, starts off pretty darned good?

Before we dig too deeply into the execution of this new Disney+ series, let’s get some horse-race stuff out of the way for those of you who are interested. The Bad Batch is a direct sequel to The Clone Wars. In fact, the first four episodes of the seventh season of TCW served as a transparent back-door pilot for this show, which follows the trials and tribulations of a squad of rogue clones in the earliest days of the Galactic Empire.

The first episode overlaps with the final four episodes of The Clone Wars and the third act of Episode III—Revenge of the Sith, which is starting to become pretty well-worn territory in the new Star Wars canon. But rather than use the fall of the Republic, destruction of the Jedi, and rise of the Empire as a denouement or conclusion, the new show uses them as a jumping-off point, which quickly leads into territory that hasn’t been explored in live-action or animation.

Not to drop too much geekiness on your screen here but what makes Clone Force 99 (aka the Bad Batch) special is that they’re defective (or “deviant,” in their own words), and as such immune to the programming that causes the Clone Army to become proto-Stormtroopers in the new Empire. Each has a mutation that gives him a special skill but also makes him less controllable. And you don’t have to be a rocket surgeon to guess that their uniqueness will eventually put them at odds with the new totalitarian regime.

Neither do you have to be too observant—although perhaps you do need to be of a certain age—to recognize that this Bad Batch shares a lot of similarities with another group of small-screen anti-heroes, The A-Team, as well as big-screen misfits like The Dirty Dozen.

In the two episodes that have aired thus far—the 75-minute “Aftermath” and the 30-minute “Cut and Run”—we don’t really get a sense of what if any role this unruly team will serve in the impending rebellion. In fact, we don’t really get much of a sense of what the show’s formula will be, aside from the “formed family on the run from the Man” trope already explored in Rebels.

But in a way, that sort of doesn’t matter—at least not yet—The Bad Batch doesn’t stand or fall on a unique premise. What makes the show work already is that it has, established a consistent tone and style in just two episodes, something that Clone Wars and Rebels fumbled around with for a bit too long. It also seems to already know what it’s about—mainly, the internal tug-of-war that arises from being an iconoclast searching for a purpose and a meaningful role in a society that seems to be falling apart.

In terms of its look, the series definitely builds on the foundation of Clone Wars, relying on similar character models and generally following the trend of taking a sort of Gerry Anderson-esque “Supermarionation” vibe and injecting a healthy dose of articulation and fluidity into the animation.

Computing power has, of course, come a long way since Clone Wars first hit screens in 2008, though, and Filoni and his team don’t seem compelled to stick to the style of that series slavishly. The animation in The Bad Batch is much more detailed, and the backgrounds in particular benefit from much more richness, depth, and sophistication.

Perhaps the most striking thing about the visuals, though, is the way  the imagery benefits from high dynamic range. The Bad Batch was created from the ground up for exhibition on Disney+, not broadcast TV, and as such has much more freedom to use shadows and light in interesting and effective ways. It remains to be seen if it maintains this Botticellian chiaroscuro aesthetic as it moves into new and unexplored environments—and it seems it will—but it already represents among the best application of Dolby Vision I’ve seen in animation to date.

Big props are also owed to composer Kevin Kiner, who returns to deliver a very different musical landscape from those he developed for Clone Wars and Rebels. With the former series,  his music skewed heavily toward a Star Wars prequel-era style, and with the latter he had to at least evoke the music of the original trilogy. With The Bad Batch, though, the he has managed to create a new and different musical language that nonetheless feels perfect for the franchise. There’s a mix of traditional and experimental, of orchestral and electronic, that feels like Star Wars without aping John Williams or Ludwig Goransson or even Kiner’s own previous work in this universe.

The sound mixers seem to realize that they have something special to work with in Kiner’s score, because they give it oodles of room to breathe, both spatially and proportionally. At its most intimate, the sound mix is a center-speaker-heavy affair. At its most bombastic, it uses the entire Dolby Atmos soundscape to drop you right into the conflict. For the most part, though, it’s a three-channel, front-heavy mix, with dialogue following the characters from left to right across the screen and Kiner’s music filling the front soundstage, leaking onto into the surrounds to give it some ambience and an additional sense of space.

In short, The Bad Batch is an audiovisual treat of the best kind. And while the series itself hasn’t quite risen to the narrative or thematic heights of its predecessors, it’s off to a consistently entertaining start, which is something that couldn’t be said of Filoni’s previous animated Star Wars adventures. It also seems to be playing things a little safe at the moment, trying too hard at times to recreate the magic of its predecessors. If it can break out of that rut (and knowing Filoni’s past work, I have every reason to suspect that it will), The Bad Batch has the potential to be something truly great.

Dennis Burger is an avid Star Wars scholar, Tolkien fanatic, and Corvette enthusiast who somehow also manages to find time for technological passions including high-end audio, home automation, and video gaming. He lives in the armpit of Alabama with his wife Bethany and their four-legged child Bruno, a 75-pound American Staffordshire Terrier who thinks he’s a Pomeranian.

PICTURE | Perhaps the most striking thing about the visuals is the way  the imagery benefits from high dynamic range

SOUND | At its most bombastic, the soundtrack uses the entire Atmos soundscape to drop you right into the conflict, but for the most part it’s a three-channel, front-heavy mix

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

© 2023 Cineluxe LLC

Scroll to top

sign up for our newsletter

receive a monthly recap of everything that’s new on Cineluxe