• Type:
  • Genre:
  • Duration:
  • Average Rating:

Kaleidescape

Second Thoughts: Licorice Pizza

Logo
Second Thoughts: Licorice Pizza

Second Thoughts | Licorice Pizza

also on Cineluxe

Sign up for our monthly newsletter
to stay up to date on Cineluxe

The differences between the original 1080p and new 4K HDR release are subtle but cumulatively add up to a far richer experience 

by Dennis Burger
April 30, 2022

What is the opposite of Death by a Thousand Tiny Cuts? It’s not a rhetorical question. I need to find a pithy idiom that fits such a description before I can fully wrap my brain around the differences between the 1080p release of Licorice Pizza and the new 4K HDR release that followed a month later on Kaleidescape (although not on disc—the 4K version is exclusive to the digital domain, it seems). 

In my original review, I said, “Of all the films I’ve seen in the past year, if any of them begs to have been released in UHD/HDR,” it’s this one. I also said you could “at times see the image struggling against” the limited resolution and squidged color palette of last generation’s home video standards. I complained of flesh tones that lacked nuance, highlights that were clipped, and detail that was lost in the shadows.

Now that my Kaleidescape download has been upgraded to 4K HDR, though, and I’ve had the opportunity to compare the full-resolution, full-gamut release to the scaled-down Blu-ray equivalent, I have to say I have a newfound appreciation for whoever oversaw the film’s high-definition down-sampling. The differences between the two are subtler than I might have expected in isolation but they add up to an experience that is cumulatively borderline transformative. 

There are, it must be said, a handful of scenes in which the 4K resolution and HDR grading make all the difference in the world. The early scene in which Gary (Cooper Hoffman) and his mother sit in a brightly lit diner discussing his upcoming trip to New York stands out. In 1080p, without the benefit of HDR, the light pouring through the windows is blown out, obliterating  a lot of the detail in the various goings-on outside the diner. 

There’s also a scene late in the film in which Alana (Alana Haim) sits on a curb in darkness watching Gary and his friends horse-play around a broken-down delivery truck. In 4K, the shots of Alana have been brought way down in overall brightness to properly reflect the time of day, but given the expanded dynamic range, we can still see details in the shadows that would have been lost had the 1080p transfer been brought down to this same overall level of darkness. 

Aside from such obvious standouts, comparing scenes between versions is a meditation on subtleties. Skin tones are a little less patchy and a little more balanced. Textures pop just a bit more. There’s significantly more consistency in the luminance from scene to scene. But frankly, the differences are often so finespun that less-attentive viewers might miss them altogether. 

I’m here to argue that those differences still matter. Perhaps you could claim that the limited color gamut and resolution of 1080p was able to capture, say, 90 percent of the meaningful chroma and luminance information locked in the original film negative. (Remember, there was no digital intermediate for this one.) But in the moment, even if you’re not consciously aware of it, your eye and your brain register those limitations—those distractions—without really putting in context how close to the target they got. 

So, yeah. Let’s call it “Revitalization by a thousand tiny boo-boo kisses.” By the time those tiny improvements are summed, you’re left with a film that’s much less distracting to watch, whose remaining imperfections were baked in the moment light passed through the lens and exposed a frame of 35mm film. Frankly, I don’t think your average videophile would fully appreciate the benefit. But for cinephiles, these differences matter. Watching the film in 4K HDR—once I got through with the academic exercise of quantifying the improvements—I found I was able to give myself over to Licorice Pizza fully in a way I don’t think would have ever been possible in 1080p. And I legitimately enjoyed it more this time around. 

Dennis Burger is an avid Star Wars scholar, Tolkien fanatic, and Corvette enthusiast who somehow also manages to find time for technological passions including high-end audio, home automation, and video gaming. He lives in the armpit of Alabama with his wife Bethany and their four-legged child Bruno, a 75-pound American Staffordshire Terrier who thinks he’s a Pomeranian.

original review

another Second Thought

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

© 2023 Cineluxe LLC

Review: Uncharted

Uncharted (2020)

review | Uncharted

Based on—and feeling a lot like—a video game, this movie features plenty of big action scenes but not a lot of character development

by John Sciacca
May 1, 2022

At CES this year, Sony brought Tom Holland—best known for playing Peter Parker in the recent Spider-Man MCU series—to its press event to discuss his upcoming role as treasure hunter Nathan Drake. Holland shared that he started playing the Uncharted game series in his trailer in between shoots on the Spider-Man: Homecoming movie. As a Sony production, Holland said PlayStations and Sony displays were readily available for crew entertainment during downtime. Before debuting the film’s major aerial action sequence, Holland also expressed that Uncharted was the most physically demanding shoot he’d ever been involved with and featured the hardest action sequences.

The Uncharted game series launched in 2007 on PlayStation 3 with Uncharted: Drake’s Fortune. Since then, there have been several sequels and expansions to the series, including the latest, Legacy of Thieves Collection, for the PlayStation 5 console. While I think I might have played some of the first game, I honestly can’t remember.

Would I have viewed the film differently if I’d been a big fan of the gaming series? Maybe; maybe not. Loving Mortal Kombat only seems to open me to being disappointed in the film versions. Regardless, my take on this movie comes without any of the baggage—good or bad—associated with the game franchise, and fortunately you don’t need any knowledge of the game to follow the story (though there is one Easter egg where Nolan North, who voices the Nathan Drake character in the games, has a cameo and engages with Holland on a beach.)

While working as a bartender in New York, Nathan is approached by seasoned treasure hunter Sully (Mark Wahlberg) to recover the massive treasure, estimated to be worth billions, from the lost Magellan expedition. Sully knew Nathan’s long-lost brother Sam, and thinks he might have some clue about the missing treasure. 

In the vein of The Da Vinci Code, Tomb Raider, and National Treasure, Uncharted is a buddy story about unlocking clues that lead to exotic locations, to find the next clue, that all ultimately leads to the treasure, all while staying just ahead of a group of bad guys also intent on seeking the loot. And if you’ve watched the trailers, you’ve essentially seen the big pieces of the film. 

Like a video game, Uncharted is essentially “cut scenes” that move the story along until you get to the next big action moment, and fortunately these big moments are pretty epic, entertaining, and exciting, and seem a way of showcasing Holland as a verifiable action star who demonstrates far more physicality and Parkour-style action here than when wearing the Spidey mask. Again, if you’ve seen the trailer, you’ll be familiar with the airplane “escape,” the hanging lights at the auction house, and the flying ships. They try to create some relationships between the characters—especially Nathan and Sully, and also frenemy Chloe Frazer (Sophia Ali)—but they really aren’t that interesting, and while the jokes and quips might work in video-game dialogue, they mostly fall short here.

Sony has repeatedly proven it knows how to deliver good-looking 4K HDR video, and fortunately Uncharted delivers on this tradition. Shot on Arri at 3.4K, there’s no information about the resolution of the digital intermediate, but images are consistently clean and sharp. While not resolving the finest details of some modern transfers, there is still plenty to appreciate in closeups, such as the rough texture of stone and rock walls, the fine stitching in a jeans jacket, or the detail in the bars of gold. Exterior scenes in Spain have beautiful white buildings with sharp, well-defined edges and terracotta roof tiles in tight, clear rows.

The HDR grade delivers both bright, punchy highlights and very natural and deep shadows during low-light scenes, producing very lifelike images. Long establishing night shots of cities always look great in 4K HDR, and New York is on full and gorgeous display here. Exteriors of the bar where Nathan works also have loads of lights at different levels, and a bar backlit through rows of liquor bottles also looks great. One scene in a cathedral is bathed in the warm and golden glow of candlelight, while another in a club is lit by garish red-orange lighting, and there are bright specular highlights of light shining off gleaming gold. 

Another scene has characters in a really dark area where Nathan lights a torch that has a bright flame. This is a bitrate torture test that can be a problem for streaming, but here it delivers a really clean image that doesn’t exhibit any banding or blocking from the varying shades of light and dark, demonstrating the strength and quality of the Kaleidescape transfer. 

You’d expect an action film like Uncharted to have a fun and immersive audio mix, and the Dolby TrueHD Atmos soundtrack delivers. There are ambient street sounds in New York like honking, cars driving, and sirens, and the score is mixed up into the height channels to create a more expansive mix. There are also the sounds of wind whipping and rushing by during the big plane scene (along with screams as people fly off and out into the corners of your room), the groaning and creaking of the old wooden ships, and the sounds of big twin-rotored helicopters lumbering and flying overhead. During one “trap,” characters are submerged in water, and your room is flooded with the sounds of rising water and the bubbling up overhead. During another there are the clear sounds of a bad guy’s boots stomping around on the ceiling overhead. Bass is also solid, deep, and weighty, delivering a tactile experience you’ll feel as much as hear. 

Directed by Ruben Fleischer, who also helmed the hilarious and creative take on zombie films with Zombieland, I hoped for a bit more originality here, or maybe something that pushed the boundaries of the typical game-franchise crossover. Uncharted isn’t a bad film; it just isn’t especially good either and offers little new or of substance. It’s like a meal at a fast-food restaurant—it might sate your hunger but doesn’t leave you satisfied.  

About halfway into watching this movie, my daughter, Lauryn, turned to my wife and I and said, “Well, it was based on a video game . . .” And that pretty much sums up Uncharted and where you should set your expectations going in. If you’re so inclined, there are two mid-credits scenes that certainly point the way toward more Uncharted adventures, so maybe our heroes will have a chance to find more stable footing going forward. 

Probably the most experienced writer on custom installation in the industry, John Sciacca is co-owner of Custom Theater & Audio in Murrells Inlet, South Carolina, & is known for his writing for such publications as Residential Systems and Sound & Vision. Follow him on Twitter at @SciaccaTweets and at johnsciacca.com.

PICTURE | While not resolving the finest details of some modern transfers, there’s still plenty to appreciate in closeups, and the HDR grade delivers both bright, punchy highlights and natural and deep shadows during low-light scenes, producing very lifelike images

SOUND | You expect an action film like this to have a fun and immersive audio mix, and the Dolby TrueHD Atmos soundtrack delivers 

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

© 2023 Cineluxe LLC

Review: Air Force One

review | Air Force One

This visually burnished 4K release features a phenomenal new Atmos mix

by John Sciacca
August 10, 2019

Here we are with another classic Sony Pictures Home Entertainment film getting the 20-year-plus 4K HDR makeover—and I’ll admit, I’m a big fan of Air Force One. Sony has given it a full 4K HDR restoration from the original 35mm print, along with retooling the soundtrack for a dynamic new Dolby Atmos mix. While it was released on 4K Blu-ray disc last November, the new 4K HDR version recently arrived at the Kaleidescape Store.  

It’s hard to think of another actor who would have been better suited to play President James Marshall than Harrison Ford, and the film largely succeeds because of his likability and believability, essentially being the type of commander-in-chief everyone could get behind. When the film came out in 1997, we were already well familiar with Ford in the role of leading-man action star from such films as the original Star Wars trilogy, the Indiana Jones trilogy, The Fugitive, and Blade Runner. Ford had also taken over the mantle of portraying Tom Clancy’s character Jack Ryan in Patriot Games and Clear and Present Danger. Clancy fans will know that as Ryan’s story arc progresses, he eventually moves up the ranks to become President of the United States, so in some ways you could consider AF1 a not-so-distant relative to the Clancy stories.

Besides his physicality, Ford was the right age to still be believable as someone capable of holding his own in a scuffle, and had the gravitas to pull off the role of commander-in-chief in the non-fight scenes. He is also backed by a strong supporting cast that includes William H. Macy, Dean Stockwell, Glenn Close, and Gary Oldman as ultra-loyalist Russian baddy, Ivan Korshunov.

The film opens with special forces parachuting into a compound to capture Kazakhstan dictator General Alexander Radek (Jürgen Prochnow) in a nighttime raid, and then cuts to a banquet in Moscow where President Marshall declares the US’s new “zero-tolerance” policy toward terrorism. He and his family (and the presidential entourage) then board Air Force One to return to the States, but during the flight, a group of terrorists loyal to Radek and led by Korshunov take over the plane, killing many of the Secret Service detail aboard. Instead of escaping the plane in a specially designed pod, President Marshall stays aboard trying to use his ex-military skills to save the hostages and retake the plane. 

This all happens in roughly the first 20 minutes, leaving a lot of time to build drama and play out the cat-and-mouse hunt aboard the plane as well as the political turmoil back in Washington as the assembled cabinet tries to come to terms with the fact that the President is possibly dead along with having a hijacked AF1 full of high-value passengers quickly flying its way back toward enemy territory.

Video quality is greatly improved throughout, with sharp and defined edges. Closeups especially benefit from the restoration, clearly revealing more details, such as individual strands of hair. Overall the film has a nice layer of cleanness to the print, making this the best AF1 has looked by far.

There was definitely a regrading of the color for this release, which is especially noticeable in the opening scenes. In the Blu-ray version, the sky is a dusky blueish purple, with some shots looking very bright—not a time when you’d do an airborne assault on a compound. In the new HDR version, the sky is much darker, with the action clearly taking place at night, making it more believable.

While they didn’t push the HDR grading too aggressively, it’s used to nice effect overall, resulting in images having greater depth and pop than the Blu-ray version. Many scenes benefit from the added pop of brightness and expanded white level and shadow detail. Notice the detail in the parachute canopy compared to how blown out the white levels are in the Blu-ray version, or the detail in the shadow’s under AF1 and around the MOCKBA sign. You also get far more impact from the displays and sensors in the plane’s communications room, the bright lights around Moscow at night, and the jet’s afterburners. And when a big KC-10 tanker explodes, the flames have bright, vivid red-orange colors. 

But a 20-plus-year-old film will never look as sharp and clean as a modern digital image, and there is some noise and excessive grain, especially in dark night scenes like the opening parachute attack. Also, some of the visual effects look truly dated and are almost laughable by current standards—for example, as the staffers escape by parachute and the big tumbling crash at the end. 

As nice as the video transfer is, the new Dolby Atmos soundmix is the real gem here. They clearly took every opportunity to have fun with the mix, and the results are phenomenal. Years ago—in 1999, I believe—I attended a CEDIA Expo where many manufacturers were using the airplane takeover scene from AF1 as a demo. That meant I got to experience the same scene on many systems, giving me a real sense of how it sounded. Polk Audio and Cinepro built a system designed to deliver realistic, lifelike audio levels, with every speaker having a minimum of 1,000 watts of power sent to it. I can remember watching that demo, and even though I’d seen it multiple times already, hearing Korshunov rack the slide on his weapon sounded like he was right next to you, and when he fired the first shot, everyone in the room jumped. The dynamics were so insane, you felt like a gun had gone off right next to you.

This new Dolby Atmos mix gets you back to that experience. You can hear the difference right from the beginning as the title score swells over the opening credits with far more space and width to the presentation. The score is also gently mixed into the front height speakers to expand the soundstage.  The opening commando raid also reveals that this is going to be a fun mix, with shouts, echoes, and gunshots filling the room along with fairly serious LFE engagement from your subwoofer.

The sound mixer also uses the speakers to put you into different acoustic environments, such as the President’s opening speech in the Moscow banquet hall, which has tons of ambience and reverb to accurately place you in that space, and the subtle ambient sounds aboard AF1.

Probably nothing benefits from the improved audio more than the F-15 fighter jets scrambled to protect/escort AF1, which sound absolutely awesome whenever they’re on screen, with their engine sounds mixed highly and realistically. The jets go ripping through the room, tearing over head and to the front of the room with deep bass you feel in your chest from their afterburners. 

Air Force One is just a fun popcorn movie that holds up incredibly well 20 years later, and it makes for a terrific evening in your home theater. 

Probably the most experienced writer on custom installation in the industry, John Sciacca is co-owner of Custom Theater & Audio in Murrells Inlet, South Carolina, & is known for his writing for such publications as Residential Systems and Sound & Vision. Follow him on Twitter at @SciaccaTweets and at johnsciacca.com.

PICTURE | The HDR grading isn’t pushed too aggressively but is used to nice effect overall, resulting in images having greater depth and pop than the Blu-ray version. 

SOUND | The new Dolby Atmos mix is the real gem here. Every opportunity was taken to have fun with the mix, with phenomenal results.

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

© 2023 Cineluxe LLC

Review: Speed

Speed (1994)

review | Speed

Jan de Bont’s Die-Hard-on-wheels still holds up as a solid actioner after almost 30 years

by John Sciacca
May 5, 2021

There are two movies I can say literally changed my life without any hyperbole. The first was Speed. (The second was Heat, but that story will have to wait for another day, and another review . . .) In 1994, my friend Travis’s dad purchased a modest home theater system from a big-box store. As I recall, it was a JBL package actually comprised of two systems—one called Music that included two speakers and a subwoofer, and one called Movies that included a center channel and rear speakers. Once the system was installed, Travis invited me and another friend, Pierre, over to see a movie. Pierre’s dad happened to own a LaserDisc player and had just purchased Speed on LaserDisc, so that seemed like the perfect actioner for three guys to watch.

While I’d certainly seen the Dolby Surround logo plastered on TV shows at the time touting the new-ish home technology (I remember it being prominently displayed during The Simpsons intro), I had never actually experienced a home surround system of any kind. And even though it was “just” four-channel Dolby Pro-Logic, I was blown away. From the opening moments of the film, hearing the elevator cables snap and spring behind me with sounds spread across the front of the room and explosions that seemed to have real depth, I couldn’t believe you could actually have a movie-like surround experience in your own home. I was enthralled with the movie and couldn’t believe how much the audio elevated it.  

I left Travis’s house a total home theater convert, knowing I needed something like that of my own. This set me on a journey down the rabbit hole of researching all the different technologies then available (this was right on the cusp of Dolby Digital—or AC-3, as it was known then—being launched on the home market), that ultimately led me to determine I no longer wanted to continue my career as a golf professional but wanted to become a custom installer and install systems like this for a living. Pretty powerful for a movie that doesn’t even last two hours that I watched heavily letterboxed on a 32-inch tube TV! 

As you can imagine, I have a pretty big soft spot in my heart for Speed, so I was thrilled when I saw that 20th Century Fox was giving it a new 4K UltraHD transfer with HDR grading. Was I mildly disappointed that they chose not to do a new Dolby Atmos immersive audio mix for the movie, rather than stick with the same 5.1-channel DTS-HD Master Audio that was used on the original Blu-ray? Sure. But I was really impressed with how dynamic and aggressive this mix was, especially when run through a modern theater processor utilizing an upmixer like Dolby Surround or DTS-Neural.

Any time you revisit a beloved film years later, it’s always a bit of a concern that things won’t hold up. Will the effects be dated and unbelievable? Will dialogue be cheesy? Will plot points that were credible 20-plus years ago now have gaping holes in them? Happily, Speed still totally holds up, being just as entertaining and engaging now as ever.

At the time, Keanu Reeves’ career was certainly on the rise, following major roles in Bill & Ted’s, Point Break, and Dracula. But he wasn’t the action hero we know today from the Matrix and John Wick films, and his role as dauntless SWAT officer Jack Traven definitely had audiences looking at him in a new light that didn’t include any surfer-dude lingo. Even less known was Sandra Bullock, and it’s safe to say her role as sudden hero Annie in Speed turbocharged her career. (Though she does seem remarkably bubbly and cute for someone thrust into the situation of driving a bus to keep people alive that could be blown up at literally any second . . .) The film is also anchored by solid performances from Dennis Hopper as baddie Howard Payne, Joe Morton as police Captain McMahon, and Jeff Daniels as Keanu’s partner, Harry. This is also the directorial debut of Jan de Bont, though he had cut his chops as cinematographer on action films like Die Hard, Black Rain, The Hunt for Red October, and Lethal Weapon 3, where he developed an eye for pacing and framing. 

While it has been called Die Hard-on-a-bus due to its near relentless action, Traven having to overcome one formidable hurdle after another, and Payne always anticipating one step ahead (and, of course, de Bont’s association with Die Hard), the film is different in that it takes its time to get to know the characters around the action, making you more involved in the story. It also jumps straight into the story and action, with none of the lengthy build-up found in Die Hard.

After officer Traven and his partner Harry foil a bomber’s attempt at ransoming hostages trapped in an elevator, Payne detonates a bomb on a city bus to get Traven’s attention. He then informs Traven that he has planted another bomb on a different bus that will explode if the bus slows below 50 MPH—or if anyone attempts to leave the bus. Traven must find a way to keep the bus’s speed above 50 MPH in LA traffic until Payne can work out his ransom demands of $3.7 million from the city, all while Harry attempts to uncover and track down the bomber.

Originally filmed in 35mm, this transfer is taken from a new 4K digital intermediate. While there is a bit of grain visible in some of the outdoor sky scenes or bright lights, it was never objectionable. Images are mostly clean and detailed, retaining a film-like look without having detail scrubbed away or looking soft. I did notice that some shots—such as early scenes inside the elevator car—have some focus or softness issues, but this is likely due to the original production. 

While you can’t expect the tack-sharp look of a modern digital production, what you do notice is the clarity and sharpness throughout, especially during closeups. There are scenes that cut between Payne watching TV broadcasts and closeups of him, and the difference in resolution and detail is startling. Later scenes where they are on the bus at the airport look especially terrific. Beyond revealing all of the lines, wrinkles, and whiskers in actors’ faces, you see detail like the winding in the strands of the elevator cabling, the sheen and texture of metal, and the fabric detail. One early scene of Harry is so sharp, you can clearly make out the different texture in the fake sweat used on his face. Longer shots—such as aerial shots when the camera pulls way back to reveal the bus amidst freeway traffic—also don’t have the overall sharp focus of modern cameras, but still look far better than any of the prior releases. 

The wider color gamut helps things like explosions to really pop with bright red-orange fireballs. We also get some vivid color from red traffic safety cones, orange-white road signs, and yellow painting in the subway. Black levels are sufficiently deep and clean, with a couple of scenes showing police uniforms that actually appeared a bit too dark, not revealing any detail. Bright lighting like fluorescents in the elevator shaft and in the subway have a lot of pop. Overall, color and images look very natural.

While Speed didn’t receive a new sound mix, it is surprisingly effective and aggressive, especially when played through a modern AV processor. The opening scene that captured my attention on first viewing all those years ago is still audibly dynamic, now with the twang and tension of elevator cables happening overhead as well as behind, giving much greater sense of height to the space. The sound designers really leaned into every opportunity to create an exciting mix, with the sounds of the bus smashing into objects off to the side, water from smashed barrels splashing up overhead, traffic and siren sounds all around, or falling debris from explosions. Helicopters pass around the room and up overhead, and the subway finale has lots of sounds streaking up the sides of the room as well as atmospherics up on the ceiling.

Bass can be deep and dynamic when called on, such as the elevator smashing into the lobby, or a variety of explosions. Dialogue is anchored to the center channel, and remains clear and intelligible throughout.  

With most of the film’s visual effects being practical, they definitely still hold up. And, yes, that includes the bus jump and the fact that they did actually blow up that plane. (The subway scene at the finale shows its age a bit, and with the enhanced resolution the model work is more noticeable.) Speed remains a ton of fun to watch, and if you haven’t seen it—or just haven’t watched in a while—this new 4K HDR transfer looks and sounds terrific and makes for a great night at the movies!

Probably the most experienced writer on custom installation in the industry, John Sciacca is co-owner of Custom Theater & Audio in Murrells Inlet, South Carolina, & is known for his writing for such publications as Residential Systems and Sound & Vision. Follow him on Twitter at @SciaccaTweets and at johnsciacca.com.

PICTURE | Images are mostly clean and detailed, retaining a film-like look without having detail scrubbed away or looking soft

SOUND | While “only” 5.1, the DTS-HD Master audio mix is surprisingly effective and aggressive, especially when played through a modern AV processor

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

© 2023 Cineluxe LLC

Review: The Batman

The Batman (2022)

review | The Batman

Batman goes decidedly noir is this latest franchise reboot, which makes for a better experience at home than at a theater

by John Sciacca
April 20, 2022

While carrying the mantle “Highest Grossing Film of 2022” might not have the same cachet in a post-pandemic world, The Batman has earned an impressive $751 million at the global box office and received very favorable reviews from both critics and fans alike.

Like many of you, I don’t find myself heading out to the commercial cinema too often any longer. Beyond the expense and the hassle, I just find myself constantly disappointed with the cinematic experience compared to my home theater. (To be fair, I live in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, and our commercial-cinema experience sets a pretty low bar. If I was fortunate enough to live near a Dolby Cinema, I’d go to a lot more showings).

But, The Batman was one of those films that managed to get me off my couch—especially after a good friend went on opening night and then gushed it was the best Batman movie ever. And, yes, that included Christopher Nolan’s The Dark Knight. Skeptical, I had to go and see for myself.

Besides rebooting the franchise—and pulling this Batman and Gotham out of the nascent DC Cinematic Universe—The Batman gives us a new man-behind-the-mask in the form of Robert Pattinson. Much like the actor portraying James Bond, fans have developed an affinity for their favorite Batman—I’ll freely admit to being in the Christian Bale camp here—and it seems like fans were a bit polarized by Ben Affleck’s portrayal, though it could have just been that the two Affleck Batman films—Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice and Justice League*—were more to blame than the actor himself.

Either way, Pattinson, best known for his portrayal of dreamy vampire Edward in the Twilight franchise—wasn’t immediately a choice embraced by fans. For me, playing Batman is the easy part—your face is hidden behind a mask, you growl out your lines, and you just need the physicality to carry the suit and the utility belt full of weapons. It’s the Bruce Wayne bit that’s tough. You have to be believable—and likable!—as the billionaire playboy who somehow finds a way to manage a whole “day job” life against all of Batman’s clandestine nighttime activities. And it was Pattinson’s role as Neil in Nolan’s Tenet that convinced me he could pull off the Wayne role and showed that his Batman was one to take seriously.

This is certainly a different feeling Batman film. And, frankly, as a reboot that’s exactly what it should be. It feels more like a slow-burning noir detective story set in a David Fincher-esque Seven world rather than a traditional Batman movie. It’s darker—both visually and in tone—and heavier than the Nolan films, and feels even more firmly rooted in reality. There is far less reliance on gadgets—with no character analogous to Lucius Fox of the Wayne Enterprises’ Applied Sciences Division—and actually far less Bruce Wayne altogether. There are no high-society parties or any of the other typical Wayne trappings we’ve come to expect. When we do see Wayne, it is often as a brooding, angst-filled, mascara-smeared man-boy with long hair hanging down in front of his face, feeling more like The Cure’s Robert Smith than Gotham’s Golden Son. 

The film opens in Gotham City on Halloween night, and someone calling themselves The Riddler (Paul Dano) commits a high-profile murder, drawing Batman into the investigation. At this point, Wayne has been Batman for just two years and he is still feeling his way. 

You can’t fault any of the performances as everyone seems believable and committed to their role, and the film features many A-list actors, including a totally unrecognizable Colin Farrell as Oswald Cobblepot/Penguin, Zoe Kravitz as Selina Kyle/Catwoman, Jeffrey Wright as James Gordon, Andy Serkis as Alfred, and John Torturro as crime boss Carmine Falcone. 

Shot on Arri at 4.5K, this transfer is taken from a 4K digital intermediate. Without question, I enjoyed watching The Batman more at home than I did in the theater. As mentioned, this is a dark film—Gotham seems to have about one hour of daylight per day, and is shrouded in perpetual overcast skies and rain unless characters are standing on top of a building bathed in brief moments of golden light during the rare sunset—and unless viewed in a flagship commercial environment, the home experience will likely look better with far more contrast. Because darkness (and black level)  is such an element throughout, a properly calibrated display is crucial for the best experience. Viewed on a Sony OLED, there are several scenes that cut to total darkness where you have pitch-black letterbox bars above and below, and the set should deliver inky blacks that truly immerse you in the action. 

While images are always clean and clear, they rarely looked tack-sharp. Undoubtedly some of this was the filming style, lens choice, or maybe even effects added in post, but the movie often looks like it was shot using an iPhone’s Portrait Mode, where the main character is clear and in focus, and everything at the sides and edges is blurred, and there are very few closeups that really jump out with great detail or resolution. Sure, you have moments when things look truly 4K—an outdoor scene at a funeral memorial has some of the sharpest, tightest focus in the film—but for the most part images look a bit flat without a ton of depth. After finishing The Batman, we flipped over and watched some scenes from the latest Bond, No Time to Die, and the sharpness uptick was unmistakable. 

Being such a dark film, the HDR grade definitely improves images, giving nice, deep blacks with plenty of detail, along with delivering plenty of bright highlights from spotlights, streetlights, headlights, flashlights, or light pouring in through windows. Gotham’s downtown is filled with brightly lit buildings, video displays, and numerous neon signs that look great. Reds also benefit from the expanded color gamut, and brake lights, flares, fireballs from explosions, and pulsing lights in a club all look vibrant and deep.

The biggest disappointment in seeing The Batman in a commercial cinema was the audio. Scenes I knew should have tons more volume and impact were just anemic. Fortunately, the Dolby TrueHD Atmos presentation from the Kaleidescape download restores all the dynamics I knew were there, delivering an exciting and immersive audio experience.

Audio is used to subtly immerse you in the scenes or establish the sense of space in an environment. From the opening, we hear the Riddler’s breathing from within his masked face wide and out into the room, and then the choral voices singing “Ave Maria” fill the room with space. During some scenes you’ll hear the drips of rain falling outside, or hear the echoes of voices, the flutter of bats flying, and drips in the Bat Cave (really more a basement than a cave . . .).

It seems no modern Dolby Atmos soundtrack is complete without either overhead thunder cracks or a helicopter flying over, and The Batman checks both these boxes. Gunshots are also loud and dynamic, and during a couple of scenes—particularly one shootout with fully automatic weapons—you can hear the sound of gunfire erupting all around the room, with bullets striking walls and ceiling. 

Bass is also weighty and tactile, such as the massive roar and rumble as Gotham’s above-ground trains thunder by, or when a car smashes into a building, or the blasting audio and driving bass at the Penguin’s club. 

One of the film’s marquee demo moments—bookmarked by Kaleidescape as “In Vengeful Pursuit”—introduces the Batmobile, which is a hopped-up, heavily Bat-ified American muscle car. The car is like a separate character, and the deep and throaty engine roar and rumble energizes the room with what feels like 1,000 horsepower. When Batman steps on the gas, you can feel the acceleration, along with every gear change, collision, and tire-shredding turn as he pursues through traffic, with vehicles blasting past—in the opposite direction!—on both sides and the sounds of horns blaring and cars swirling and spinning out of control. This scene is tailor-made for giving demos and I can only imagine how it would be enhanced with D-Box motion seating.

At nearly three hours, the pacing is slow, and there are often long periods between the next “event,” making it feel long at times. Even when it feels the film is wrapping up, there is another 30 minutes! And watching it a second time, it had the feel of a Director’s Cut, where additional, not totally relevant but still interesting scenes are reinserted or just lengthened to further flesh out a scene or character, and that some nips and trims would make for a tighter, more engaging experience. 

While I would disagree with my friend—I don’t think this is the best Batman movie ever—it’s still engaging and entertaining, and director Matt Reeves gives us an interesting new take on the Dark Knight that certainly looks and sounds better when screened at home.

* There was so much hoopla around the massive recut and reshot Zack Snyder’s Justice League that it practically needs to be considered as a third film on its own.

Probably the most experienced writer on custom installation in the industry, John Sciacca is co-owner of Custom Theater & Audio in Murrells Inlet, South Carolina, & is known for his writing for such publications as Residential Systems and Sound & Vision. Follow him on Twitter at @SciaccaTweets and at johnsciacca.com.

PICTURE | Being such a dark film, the HDR grade definitely improves images, giving nice, deep blacks with plenty of detail, along with delivering plenty of bright highlights 

SOUND | Kaleidescape’s Dolby TrueHD Atmos presentation delivers an exciting and immersive audio experience, with weighty and tactile bass

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

© 2023 Cineluxe LLC

Review: Star Wars: A New Hope

review | Star Wars: A New Hope

Despite all of Lucas’s tinkering with the original film, the 4K HDR transfer captures what was best about the 1977 release

by John Sciacca
May 3, 2020

As I mentioned in my review of The Empire Strikes Back, this year’s May the Fourth celebration (or Revenge of the Fifth, should you prefer the Dark Side) will be particularly festive thanks to the recent release of the Star Wars franchise in 4K HDR with Dolby Atmos soundtracks. Even better, internet services are currently discounting the titles, with each movie available for download on Kaleidescape for $13.99. So we thought it would be worth taking a look at the film that started it all: Star Wars—or, as it’s now known, A New Hope.

While the modern usage of “blockbuster” started in 1975 with Spielberg’s Jaws, Star Wars took that to the next level in 1977. In our modern era where movies are in and out of the theater in a little over a month, Star Wars enjoyed a theatrical run that lasted over a year, including one theater in Beaverton, Oregon that ran it for 76 weeks! Images of lines wrapping around the block waiting to get a seat were commonplace. 

I was seven when the film came out, and I can clearly recall seeing it for the first time. My family was visiting Carmel, California, and my parents dropped me and my cousin off at the theater while they went shopping. I can’t recall having any anticipation about seeing the movie, or even hearing anything about it prior to walking into the theater, but my world changed when the lights dropped and that opening fanfare blared from the speakers. When that Star Destroyer flew overhead for the first time, I remember thinking this was like nothing I’d ever seen before, and how was this even possible?!? 

For two hours, my cousin and I sat engrossed, taking it all in. When it ended, we ran out to the lobby, told my parents that we had just seen the most incredibly movie of all time! and then turned around and went back inside to watch it again! We then spent the rest of the vacation lightsaber fighting each other with anything we could grab that could be imagined into a sword. 

I was also fortunate enough to see Star Wars at Grauman’s Chinese Theater in Hollywood—which also showed the film for a staggering 57 weeks!—where my biggest memories are of the giant auditoriums and eating an entire box of Red Vines I also used as straws to drink a large Coke.

Today, there are basically three different generations of Star Wars fans: Those who grew up with the original trilogy, those raised on the prequel trilogies, and those who have come in recently with the sequel trilogies. And, with no disrespect to the newer fans, it’s difficult to fully appreciate just how important Star Wars is to someone who didn’t grow up with it. From 1977 to 1983, it played a massive role in our lives. It was what we played, what we talked about, what we imagined, what we dreamed. 

With Star Wars, George Lucas created a universe so real and so unlike anything that had come before that it transcended just being a movie. And to have this come about at an age when you were old enough to understand just how special and different it was, and then grow up with it over the next six years . . . well, it’s not an exaggeration to say it shaped many people’s lives. 

If you grew up during that time, you fantasized about making that trench run in your X-wing and using the Force to fire those proton torpedoes, or waving your hand and changing someone’s mind, snapping open your lightsaber and standing down Vader. playing space chess (technically “Dejarik”) with Chewie aboard the Falcon, or having a Princess place a medal around your neck while the galaxy cheers. 

And, to think, it was nearly not to be. Multiple studios passed on the film early on, and first edits were said to be nearly unwatchable. The film was basically saved in post production as the incredible models and special effects came together and was finally bolstered by one of the greatest soundtracks ever thanks to John Williams. (If you haven’t watched the fascinating and fantastic two-and-a-half-hour documentary Empire of Dreams—The Story of the Star Wars Trilogy, I assure you it’s worth the price of a month’s subscription to Disney+ for that alone!)

Taken from a new 4K scan, this transfer is sourced from a 4K digital intermediate, and images are incredibly clean and detailed throughout with little film grain, but also little damaging effects or softening from heavy-handed use of DNR (digital noise reduction). It’s hard to believe you’re watching a film that’s 43 years old, especially when you get to the finale, which has visual effects that still impress. (Granted they’ve been digitally helped over the years, but still . . .) 

Closeups reveal incredible detail, such as the scratches and textures in the metal of R2-D2’s dome, or the streaks of white paint on his body. You can see the fray in Obi-Wan’s (Sir Alec Guinness) robe along with every line in his face, and practically feel the velvet texture of Vader’s cape. In one scene on the Death Star, I was able to clearly read the THX-1138 on one of the monitor screens in the background, a homage to Lucas’ first film. You could also see that the masks of the Stormtroopers influenced by Obi-Wan were a bit sloppily finished, with paint that isn’t perfect.

Colors look terrific and natural, with laser blasts and lightsabers appropriately bright, as well as the bright blue of the Falcon’s engine and the red of the X-wings’ thrusters. (I’m also happy they fixed the saber “fizzle” during Obi-Wan and Darth’s battle.) You can see the crags and textures in the rocks near Obi-Wan’s cave and all of the fine details put into the interior of the Falcon to make it look like a ship that has logged a lot of miles, errr, parsecs, traveling the galaxy. 

Black levels are deep and space looks appropriately inky but not at the expense of crushing shadow detail. This really gives nice pop to all of the spaceships, as they stand out in stark contrast to the blackness of space around them. Notice the early scenes aboard the Tantive IV as Leia and the droids move around darkened corridors and passageways or the prisoner detention bay on the Death Star with its deep-black walls, but you can still make out detail in the guards’ black uniforms. 

HDR brightness is used sparingly—the Falcon’s glowing engines, big explosions—but the contrast added by the extra dynamic range provides enhanced images throughout, adding depth and dimension. 

Sonically, Star Wars was game-changing, winning an Academy Awards for Best Sound and a Special Achievement Award for Ben Burtt’s sound effects. And they’ve definitely done an admirable job of amping up the sound mix for the 21st century while retaining the classic elements that made it so memorable. From the opening, the Star Destroyer flies overhead, explosions bombarding Leia’s ship. And when the tractor beam grabs it, you hear and feel the ship being pulled overhead. When the Falcon escapes the Death Star, TIE fighters fly over and around in pursuit but the biggest sonic moment is held for the end, during the attack on the Death Star, with trench guns blasting all around, TIE’s screaming past and roaring overhead. 

Every scene is brought to life with its own sonic space. You get the winds blowing overhead in the Tatooine desert, the background hum of life and little mechanical noises aboard the Death Star, the sounds rattling around in the cantina, the appliance sounds in Owen and Beru’s kitchen, and the squeaks and groans of metal twisting and crushing in the garbage compactor.

Blaster fire is nice and dynamic, and bass is deep and engaging, such as the deep thrum of the Falcon’s sub-light engines, the Death Star priming its main weapon, or the buzz of lightsabers. Deeper bass comes from the Falcon jumping to hyperspace and the massive explosion of planets, with the Death Star’s explosion sounding particularly good, featuring a massive bass wave that then ripples and travels back the left side of the room. 

Yes, you can bemoan that this isn’t the original theatrical cut we grew up with and that Lucas has tinkered yet again with the (now) infamous “Who shot first?” Cantina scene. (Just Google “Maclunkey,” if you aren’t aware.) Or that the added CGI creatures outside Mos Eisley bring nothing to the film—rather, now appearing jarringly out of place—and that the added Jabba scene just steals the greatness of his reveal later in Return of the Jedi. I’ll grant you all of that. But to that, I’m still going all in with this: This 4K HDR version of A New Hope is hands-down the definitive, best the movie has ever looked and sounded, and if you don’t watch it you are punishing only yourself.

Probably the most experienced writer on custom installation in the industry, John Sciacca is co-owner of Custom Theater & Audio in Murrells Inlet, South Carolina, & is known for his writing for such publications as Residential Systems and Sound & Vision. Follow him on Twitter at @SciaccaTweets and at johnsciacca.com.

PICTURE | It’s hard to believe you’re watching a film that’s 43 years old, especially when you get to the finale, which has visual effects that still impress

SOUND | They’ve definitely done an admirable job of amping up the sound mix for the 21st century while retaining the classic elements that made it so memorable

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

© 2023 Cineluxe LLC

Review: Moonfall

Moonfall (2022)

review | Moonfall

recent reviews

Sign up for our monthly newsletter
to stay up to date on Cineluxe

Can a really bad movie make for a satisfying two-hour-plus wall-to-wall home theater demo? Yes.

by John Sciacca
April 11, 2022

You’ve probably heard of movies that are “so bad, they’re good,” and I’m not even sure whether Moonfall is too bad or not quite bad enough to be considered good. But, before you write it off completely, let me just tease you with this: If you give Moonfall a watch—particularly on Kaleidescape where it includes a lossless Dolby TrueHD Atmos soundtrack—it will likely be one of the most immersive and demo-worthy audio experiences you’ll have.  

Written and directed by Roland Emmerich, who also brought us such global-disaster films as Independence Day, Godzilla (1998), The Day After Tomorrow, and 2012, this continues his affinity for taking the planet right to the brink of destruction while also being less concerned or constrained by things being fixed in reality or filling all the plot holes. 

In a nutshell, I’d describe Moonfall as a film meant for people who thought Michael Bay’s 1998 Armageddon was a well-thought-out strategic think piece but just a bit too rooted in science and reality. Or those who enjoyed the spectacle, mayhem, and landscape destruction that is Emmerich’s signature move, à la White House Down or Midway. 

And if your suspension of disbelief isn’t fazed by the proposition of having a couple of days to yank a long retired and decommissioned (and graffiti-laden) Space Shuttle Endeavor out of a museum, somehow trailering it down the highway, loading it onto a plane that ferries it to a launch pad and fully fueling it, mating it with experimental Chinese technology, and then letting two retired astronauts and a conspiracy theorist fly it to the moon to save the planet, well then, you’ll be right at home.

When I first saw the trailer, I thought this was going to be a big-budget self-aware disaster comedy, or something akin to Don’t Look Up. And that it starred Halle Berry—an Oscar winner for Best Actress!—I figured . . . well, I don’t know, that it would be good.

But, no.

I kept waiting for the actors to give some hint that they were in on the joke, kind of like in Airplane!, like it was OK to laugh at some of this ridiculousness, but every line, no matter how absurd, is uttered with 110% over-the-top sincerity. And if the KC Houseman character played by John Bradley (who’ll you’ll likely know as Samwell Tarly from Game of Thrones) reminds you of Josh Gad, it’s probably because Gad was originally cast for the role but had to drop out due to a schedule conflict. 

Fans of cataclysmic disaster films will find much to love here. The moon’s orbit is deteriorating, bringing it into a rapid collision course with the earth, which would obviously make for a very bad day. As the moon—but is it even a moon at all?!?—gets closer, the earth experiences tsunamis, gravitational abnormalities, earthquakes, and radical atmospheric changes, with large chunks of the moon breaking off and pelting the planet. Looting runs rampant, cities are destroyed, mayhem ensues. And when you think it can’t get any crazier, there are hijackings, car chases, and crazy gravity-destroying things all around as the moon draws impossibly closer to the earth. As one character so accurately quips, “This is a whole ‘nother level of insane.” Cue ex-astronaut/current Deputy Director of NASA Jocinda Fowler (Berry) and disgraced former astronaut Brian Harper (Patrick Wilson)—who also happened to serve as Fowler’s crew mate a decade before—and Houseman taking the Endeavor to the moon to figure things out before it’s too late. 

Throw in some interpersonal family relationships, self-aware nanobot alien technology, tons of explosions and CGI, numerous references to Elon Musk, and a third act that attempts to explain the origins of life, the universe, and everything (and, no, it isn’t “42”), and you’ve got the 2 hours and 10 minutes that are Moonfall.

If you can get past all that, and just sit back and enjoy the images up on screen and the sound swirling around you, Moonfall is actually a home theater masterpiece. Shot on Redcode Raw at 8K resolution, this transfer is taken from a 4K digital intermediate, and images look terrific. They’re clean and sharp with many shots having incredible, near three-dimensional depth. Closeups have tons of detail, such as seeing every tooth in a jacket’s zipper or each individual whisker on Donald Sutherland’s face.

One drawback to all these pixels of resolution is that some of the CGI effects can look a bit cheesy. There was a scene where multiple cars were being destroyed by flooding, and I couldn’t tell if I was looking at bad CGI or just a bunch of miniature models being moved around. Also a bit odd, considering this is set in current times, is that many of the computers and TVs are old CRT monitors. 

The HDR grade gives plenty of pop to bright images, such as the gleaming white space suits astronauts wear, the Shuttle’s tiles, or numerous bright lights from flashlights, searchlights, fluorescent overheads, indicator lights inside the shuttle, or sunlight pouring in through windows. An opening shot of the earth has it surrounded by a vibrant blue band of atmosphere; explosions have bright, vibrant red-orange fireballs; and another scene has a cabin lit in golden-orange glows from fire and candlelight. 

I did notice that blacks are more a dark grey in some parts rather than the true, deep black of the letterbox bars. This was apparent in shots in space and also during full screen cuts to “black” that are clearly more deep grey, which is especially noticeable when watching in a light-controlled room on an OLED.

Now, we arrive at the main course: Moonfall‘s Dolby Atmos audio track. It is, how you say, “chef’s kiss.” From the get-go, the sound mixer clearly understood the assignment and pushed his dials to 11. Virtually every scene is packed with some sonic moment that will show off your surround system. 

This movie has nearly every sound element and moment Atmos was created to enhance, and I dare say, if there was ever a film mixed for the full complement of 34 speakers Dolby Atmos supports, it was Moonfall. Sure, it has plenty of those scene-defining moments like traffic and office noise, or sounds off in the distance like shouting, explosions, and sirens, but that’s just the sonic amuse bouche. 

The main course serves up rainfall pattering overhead, multiple helicopters passes around the room and overhead, the echo of voices expanding interior spaces, the boom of announcements overhead, things smashing, crashing and swirling around the room, nano particles that reach out and engulf and surround you, meteorites streaking overhead and plummeting into the objects all around you. 

Oh, yeah—and bass. Plenty of it. Deep, massive, tactile couch-shaking, room-energizing bass. Whether it is the deep rumble of the Shuttle’s rockets, the massive sounds of floodwaters rising up overhead, the crackling of things being destroyed, or the planet being pummeled by chunks of the moon, your subs will get plenty of work. Be aware: This mix is loud and dynamic, so play it back at reference volume level at your own peril!

I found dialogue to be mostly intelligible, but there was one scene during a space launch where there are tons of effects and rumbles and sonic cacophony happening and with -the characters are wearing masks, making some of the lines difficult to understand. But, honestly, I doubt anything they said was really important. 

Ultimately, Moonfall is a big, dumb, high-budget disaster film where tons of stuff is destroyed. But it is perhaps better to think of it not as one of the most expensive independent films ever made but rather as a lengthy Dolby Atmos demo sizzle reel that happens to feature some well-known actors interwoven with a space movie. Taken in that context, it’s a lot of fun. 

Probably the most experienced writer on custom installation in the industry, John Sciacca is co-owner of Custom Theater & Audio in Murrells Inlet, South Carolina, & is known for his writing for such publications as Residential Systems and Sound & Vision. Follow him on Twitter at @SciaccaTweets and at johnsciacca.com.

PICTURE | Images are clean and sharp, with many shots having incredible, near three-dimensional depth

SOUND | This movie has nearly every sound element and moment Atmos was created to enhance. If there was ever a film mixed for the full complement of 34 speakers Dolby Atmos supports, this is it.

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

© 2023 Cineluxe LLC

Review: The Burning Sea

The Burning Sea (2021)

review | The Burning Sea

recent reviews

Sign up for our monthly newsletter
to stay up to date on Cineluxe

This Norwegian film ventures into Hollywood disaster-film territory, but much more intimately

by John Sciacca
April 5, 2022

IMDB lists the combined US and Canada box-office gross for The Burning Sea as $493. And, no, I’m not missing any digits there—it made less than $500 at North American cinemas. So it’s probably a pretty safe bet that, like me, this isn’t a film you saw or even heard about. In fact, it wasn’t until reading a comment about its 4K HDR release on the Kaleidescape Owner’s Forum that I was even aware it existed. And at just $14.99 to purchase, I was willing to give it a watch.

My wife and I are fans of foreign films, but typically these end up being romantic comedies, period pieces, or dramas, and less so major disaster films. According to the film’s tagline—“First came The Wave. Then came The Quake. Prepare for . . . The Burning Sea”—this is the third disaster film from the same creative team. But it doesn’t appear to have anything in common with the other two films other than being about “natural” disasters set in Norway. 

The film opens with documentary-style footage showing drilling-company exec William Lie (Bjorn Floberg) recounting that Norway has enjoyed 50 years of prosperous offshore oil drilling. But after drilling thousands of holes in the ocean floor, a major crack has opened, causing an oil rig to collapse and threatening to destroy up to 350 other rigs on the water, which could produce an apocalyptic catastrophe that would affect the Norwegian coastline and much of Europe for decades. 

The most obvious comparisons here are with Deepwater Horizon, the 2016 film starring Mark Wahlberg that chronicled the true story of the BP oil-rig disaster off the Louisiana coast. But The Burning Sea is certainly smaller and more intimate, focusing less on the disaster and rescue of entire crews and more on Sofia (Kristine Kujath Thorp), a scientist who controls an Eeelume (a kind of eel/torpedo-looking submarine exploration robot), who makes it her mission to find and rescue her boyfriend, Stian (Henrik Bjelland), after he’s abandoned aboard one of the damaged rigs. While there are certainly explosions and rigs collapsing, and some decent CGI, those looking for a massive effects-laden, Hollywood-blockbuster-style disaster film will likely be disappointed. This is more character driven than just a massive explosion-fest. 

In a way, Sofia’s arc reminded me a bit of the terrible, horrible, no good, very bad day Sandra Bullock’s character experienced in Gravity, but on water instead of in space, as she is bounced from one calamity to the next. While the story is a bit predictable—you can see that Stian is going to be the character in peril about a mile away—it’s still interesting to watch, and the 104-minute runtime keeps things moving fairly quickly after the opening act establishes the characters and story. Also, it appears that much of the action is filmed aboard actual oil rigs, giving authenticity to the sets.

There are certainly some barbs about climate change and the damage man has inflicted on the planet, but Burning Sea is more a cautionary tale of what could happen if a series of events caused numerous rigs across a wide section of the ocean to fail. Also, the film really focuses almost solely on the plight of Sofia and Stian and doesn’t really address or deal with the aftermath of the “solution” that would have been an environmental disaster exceeding the oil fires Saddam Hussein lit during the first Gulf War.

Shot on 35mm film, there is no information on the resolution of the home transfer, but I found the images to be mostly high quality. There are a few scenes—long shots of the rigs on the water or really low-lit scenes inside darkened environments like the rigs or the robot lab—that had some noise or were a bit grainy and lacked fine detail and dipped into HD quality, and there is certainly some grain visible in the grey, cloud-filled Norwegian skies. But for the most part, images are clear and sharp throughout, particularly closeups that have actors in tight focus, or things like the textures in blankets and jacket patterns. Like all films, images really look their best in well lit exterior shots when the lens can take in all that light. 

Much of the color palette features earth tones—browns, beiges, rust, and tans—and kind of a steely grey and blue of overcast skies and seas, but these are contrasted with the bright reds of the rescue helicopters, vibrant yellows of emergency vehicles, and the orange safety suits worn by rig workers. 

The HDR grade gives plenty of pop to the blazing red-orange flames of explosions and oil fires, as well as punch to bright overhead lighting inside offices and the rigs, though I did notice a couple of computer screens where the brightness looked a tad blown out. Another area where the grade really helps is in the detail and definition in the grey-cloudy skies, letting you see far more individuality to the shapes rather than just a mass of one color. Also, I never noticed any banding or other noise in the underwater shots, where the bright lights from the Eeelume shining through the water produce myriad shades of similar colors and transitions that can often be problematic without enough bandwidth. 

Home theater fans will love the Dolby TrueHD Atmos audio soundtrack included with the Kaleidescape download. While there is a dubbed English-language audio track (also in Atmos), I implore you to turn the subtitles on and listen to the film with the original actor’s speaking in Norwegian. I turned the English track on just for a moment to check the sound, and the actress voicing Sofia was so off—reminding both me and my wife of Pam from The Office—that it was impossible to take seriously.

This mix is filled with all the things Atmos owners love—from the small environmental details to the big, obvious height effects. The sonics transform your listening room into a completely different environment when the action goes underwater, giving more weight and texture to the sounds of bubbles and rumbles and undersea noises. Every environment has its own sonic quality, whether it’s the whine of hydraulics and machinery, water drips and echoes, or wires and motors in the robot lab and aboard the rigs, or the sounds of phones ringing, keyboards clacking and chatter happening inside offices, or the sounds of waves lapping outside. 

Your height speakers will also come into frequent use, whether it’s the sounds of an aircraft hangar door squealing up overhead, heavy rains lashing a rig, the cacophony of sirens, bells, and alarms, or a pair of jet fighters (F35s?) streaking past overhead. Helicopters also make frequent appearances and flyovers throughout, and the sounds of helos passing overhead and rotor noise abounds. 

While this isn’t a super bass-heavy mix, subwoofers are called into action when appropriate, and can deliver some massive, room-rumbling bass, such as when the rigs explode and vessels are ripped underwater or when large ocean waves are smashing into the rigs. 

If you are looking for an alternative to Hollywood’s typical take on disaster films, The Burning Sea offers a more personal, heroine-led approach, more focused on people than destruction, with an active Dolby Atmos mix that is sure to excite and won’t leave you wondering whether your height speakers are working or not. 

Probably the most experienced writer on custom installation in the industry, John Sciacca is co-owner of Custom Theater & Audio in Murrells Inlet, South Carolina, & is known for his writing for such publications as Residential Systems and Sound & Vision. Follow him on Twitter at @SciaccaTweets and at johnsciacca.com.

PICTURE | A few scenes have some noise or are a bit grainy, lacking fine detail and dipping into HD quality, but for the most part, images are clear and sharp throughout

SOUND | The mix is filled with all the things Atmos owners love, from environmental details to big, obvious height effects, transforming your listening room into a completely different environment when the action goes underwater

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

© 2023 Cineluxe LLC

Review: Death on the Nile (2022)

Death on the Nile (2022)

review | Death on the Nile (2022)

recent reviews

Sign up for our monthly newsletter
to stay up to date on Cineluxe

Kenneth Branagh, all-star cast in tow, takes another stab at a Christie whodunnit

by John Sciacca
April 3, 2022

Growing up, my mother got me interested in Agatha Christie mysteries, and there was a time in high school when I had lofty plans of plowing through all of her novels. (A mountain I did not even come close to summiting.) But what remained was a love for watching the film versions of her famed detectives Miss Marple and Mr. Hercule Poirot piecing together seemingly incomprehensible clues to determine whodunnit. And the films usually had enough time between remakes that it was always a bit of a surprise to remember who the guilty party—or parties—were. (My particular favorite is Ten Little Indians, though it includes neither Marple nor Poirot.) 

Hollywood has an affinity for revisiting Christies classics, and Kenneth Branagh is the latest director to have caught the remake bug. In 2017, he brought Murder on the Orient Express to the big screen, along with taking on the starring role of mustachioed sleuth Poirot, and now he again returns as both director and star of Death on the Nile.

Christies novels are nearly always packed with characters—all the easier to spread the suspicion around!—and have been able to attract star-laden casts throughout their many remakes. Branagh certainly followed this lead, packing Express with multiple A-listers, including Penelope Cruz, Willem Dafoe, Judi Dench, Johnny Depp, and Michelle Pfeiffer; and he continues that trend here, though dialing the star power down a bit, but still drawing Gal Gadot, Armie Hammer, Letitia Wright, Annette Bening, and Tom Bateman (who is the only other returning character from Express, in the role of Poirots friend, Bouc).

The film opens in 1914 with a bit of non-canonical backstory, showing Poirot developing skills of perception during a battle in World War I and also offering an explanation for his character’s iconic moustache. (Though the stache has never been quite as magnificent as the one Branagh wears here.)

From there we cut to a London nightclub in 1937, where we meet Jackie Bellefort (Emma Mackey) passionately dancing with fiancée Simon Doyle (Armie Hammer). Shortly after, Doyle is introduced to heiress Linnet Ridgeway (Gadot), and it is pretty clear the two are smitten from the start. Cut to a hotel in Egypt, where we are celebrating the wedding of Doyle and Ridgeway, and we continue adding to the cast of characters and eventual suspects.

Jackie is not one to take this jilting lightly, and she has been obsessively following the newlyweds around trying to convince Doyle he still loves her. To escape Jackie, the couple charters a cruise ship for their honeymoon, and the wedding party boards the S.S. Karnak for a luxury cruise down the Nile where the champagne flows nearly as freely as the water. But as the title states, there is a death—more accurately a murder—aboard the Karnak, and it is up to Poirot to investigate and interrogate the passengers in his aggressive manner—He accuses everyone of murder!” “Its a problem, I admit.”—and determine the identity of the guilty party before the boat returns to port.

Shot on 65mm film and taken from a 4K digital intermediate, the film is beautiful to look at, with great attention given to the sets, decoration, and costuming. According to one of the extras, building the Karnak took nearly a full year, and it looks and feels it. Unfortunately, the film was all shot in studios in England—not Morocco, as originally planned—and the exterior scenes are sets, green screen, and CGI, and frequently look it, particularly when showing exteriors of buildings like the hotel in Egypt. But having much of the action take place aboard the Karnak helps anchor it somewhat in reality—even if all the waters and exteriors arent. The recreation of Abu Simbel does look impressive, though, and the resolution helps you appreciate the care that went into its construction.

The film opens in black & white, which can look great in HDR, with its clear extremes of contrast. While we dont get truly inky blacks in this opening, we do get loads of contrast in the trenches and can nearly taste the grit of the war. The movie looks its best in exterior scenes where that huge film frame just soaks up the light and delivers beautiful images, and in closeups, where you can marvel at the detail and attention given to the costumes and numerous fabrics. Notice the texture in jackets, hats, shirts, and dresses, where you can clearly see the different details, the pinpoint stitching, weaves, weights, and sheens of each. The Karnaks exterior, with its clean, tight lines and rows of slats covering doors and windows down the side of the ship, also looks appropriately sharp. 

The large film frame also provides great depth of field, making long shots clear and in focus. While they arent real, notice the pyramids Poirot studies or the crowds in the market and how everyone is sharp and clear. This also delivers terrific detail on actorsfaces as the camera comes in tight. 

The HDR grade is used to deliver some punchy, bright whites when needed, such as the stage and dance-floor lighting in the club or the beautiful golden hues of fire-lit rooms inside Abu Simbel or the warm red-orange-gold Nile sky and waters illuminated at sunrise/set. There’s a shot of the Karnak all lit up at night that also looks particularly stunning. The HDR grade also provides some nice pop to the bright white of Poirots suit against the Egyptian desert sands, but also has enough range to easily distinguish the white color differences and layers between shades of white in dinner jackets and shirts. 

Via Kaleidescape, Death on the Nile includes a Dolby TrueHD Atmos surround mix, and while it isnt overly aggressive, it certainly serves the story. I found some of the dialogue—particularly in the nightclub with blues singer Salome (Sophie Okonedo)—to be a bit chesty,” but otherwise it is pretty coherent. 

The audio mix is mostly used to serve up atmospheric sounds that place you in the scene, whether it’s the cacophony of the crowded markets in Egypt with voices and shouts around, the way voices echo within Abu Simbel, or the swirling winds of a sand storm. It is often the quieter moments in Nile where the mix proves its mettle subtly, such as when characters are standing outside talking, where youll notice the gentle sound of water lapping, insects buzzing, birds, or the soft sound of wind rustling, or aboard the Karnak where there is the background sounds of the bassy engine and paddle turning.

Dont expect your subwoofer to give a lot of flex here, but there are a couple of moments where deep bass is called on and it delivers, such as an explosion during the opening flashback, when the Karnark drops its heavy anchor, or when a heavy stone breaks away and falls. 

At over two hours, Death on the Nile is a bit long and drags in parts. And even though the character list has been trimmed from Christies novel, keeping up with everyone and their relationships and backstory can still be a bit much. (As with all of her works, just assume that everyone is connected to the victim and has a motive, no matter how abstract.) But, for the sharp-eyed, the clues are there and this is a solvable mystery, even for those sans moustache. Niles true saving grace is its look and style, and it certainly makes for a beautiful evening up on a luxury display. 

Probably the most experienced writer on custom installation in the industry, John Sciacca is co-owner of Custom Theater & Audio in Murrells Inlet, South Carolina, & is known for his writing for such publications as Residential Systems and Sound & Vision. Follow him on Twitter at @SciaccaTweets and at johnsciacca.com.

PICTURE | The movie looks its best in exterior scenes where the huge film frame just soaks up the light and delivers beautiful images, and in closeups, where you can marvel at the detail and attention given to the costumes and numerous fabrics  

SOUND | While the Atmos mix isnt overly aggressive, it serves the story well—although some of the dialogue can be a bit chesty.” 

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

© 2023 Cineluxe LLC

Review: Annie Hall

Annie Hall (1977)

review | Annie Hall

Woody Allen’s first truly great film is less a romantic comedy than an incisive and beguiling cultural document of New York in the mid ’70s 

by Michael Gaughn
January 5, 2021

It’s impossible to talk about a Woody Allen movie without having to first weigh in on the ongoing efforts to vilify Allen and obliterate all traces of his career. He’s been spattered with so much bile by Hollywood types like Greta Gerwig and Ellen Page who’ve blindly bought into the Me Too herd mentality that there are fewer and fewer people even willing to approach his films let alone consider them objectively. 

I’m hoping to do an appreciation of his career where I can go into all this a little more. What I would ask for the moment is that you try to ignore the grating cacophony of squeaky wheels and appreciate the works of one of the most accomplished filmmakers of the ‘70s and ‘80s for what they are.

Annie Hall is known as a romantic comedy—a perception that had a lot to do with it snagging a Best Picture Oscar. The thing is, it’s not really a romantic comedy—at least not for me. 

That I’ve never found Diane Keaton to be very attractive, or a very good actress, has helped me develop a different—and I think more accurate—take on the film. Annie Hall is actually a very ambitious, incisive, and candid attempt to capture the essence of a particular culture at a particular moment in time via its embodiment in a particular personality—and that personality is not Keaton.

There had to be a reason why Allen suddenly shifted away from all of those gag-driven early movies that served as his film school and allowed him to build the fan base he was able to ride for the next four decades. And there has to be a reason why he suddenly went from being a good-enough comedy director to a fully fledged and inspired filmmaker.

And I think the answer lies in this exchange from the film:

“The failure of the country to get behind New York City is anti-Semitism.”

“But, Max, the city is terribly run.”

“But we’re not discussing politics or economics. This is foreskin. . . . Don’t you see? The rest of the country looks at New York like we’re Left-Wing Communist, Jewish, homosexual pornographers. I think of us that way sometimes, and I live here.”

New York City had pretty much imploded in the wake of the social upheaval of the ‘60s and was in a wretched state by the mid ‘70s. Very much like the way it’s portrayed in Scorsese’s Taxi Driver, it had become a kind of repository for all of the country’s sins. This was probably the city’s darkest period, years before the unfettered avarice of the ‘80s turned Manhattan into a playground for billionaires and Brooklyn into a day-care center for their kids. 

Allen’s identification with the city was so strong that this all had to have sent him reeling. Knowing that it was the prime source of his inspiration—and of his creativity in general—he needed to work out what it meant to be a popular entertainer trying to create within a metropolis that the rest of the country was treating like it had the plague. 

That’s what Annie Hall is really about—Diane Keaton was just his Trojan Horse, a way to open some doors and to make sure the studio got its money back. 

The movie comes very close to being a drama. Just slightly shift the emphasis of almost every one of the scenes and it becomes a sobering look at people desperately trying to define themselves at a time when there were very few reliable guideposts to lean on. Had Allen approached the film that way—although he wasn’t yet that good of a filmmaker—Annie Hall would have been wrenching instead of hilarious.

Consider how Allen treats his own character—which is the same as saying, how he treats himself. This is not a very flattering portrayal—miles away from the narcissism he’s too often accused of. Alvy Singer displays a lot of bluster, and uses his jokes as his armor, but you can tell the guy is hopelessly lost—which Allen expresses through the movie’s loose, improvisational structure, trying on different styles and techniques and attitudes to see what will stick.

But that shouldn’t be mistaken as Allen himself flailing from behind the camera. Just consider the famous scene of him and Keaton on line at The New Yorker, where Allen humiliates the pontificator by dragging a seemingly embalmed Marshall McLuhan into the shot. It’s a nuanced and logistically complex near-3-minute single-take piece of bravura comedy filmmaking that only a self-assured and truly inspired director could have pulled off. And that’s just one example among many.

True, this isn’t the film Allen set out to make, and a lot of Annie Hall did come together in the editing room. But the list of genius directors who’ve confided that the real filmmaking happens in the editing is long. And they’re not wrong. 

Allen started out with a film that was true to his intentions but was all cake and no icing, and he sweetened it just enough to make it palatable for his audience, which was expecting another Sleeper. In the end, he found himself named King of the Romantic Comedy with a couple of Oscars left at his door—an experience he likely wasn’t expecting and that probably scared the bejeezus out of him.

Annie Hall was Allen’s Rhapsody in Blue—a loosely structured, jazz-inflected work that announced that he had ambitions that went beyond being a successful pop performer. And, as with Gershwin, he was never able to do anything quite that fluid and intuitive again, instead trying on different genres defined by others with decidedly mixed results.

But Hall holds up. A surprising number of the jokes and gags still land, his approach to the material and the scenes remains fertile unexplored territory for other filmmakers, and the way he took the careening wreck of New York City and turned it into the most vital and romantic place on Earth is still seductive. The City owes him a statue—but then some group of Yahoos would come along and demand that it be taken down.

Talking about seeing the film in HD is difficult. Gordon Willis’s cinematography is known for being dark and bold, but it’s very subtle, almost documentary-like here. In HD, it feels flatter than it should—not unwatchable, just flat. And then there’s the weird dilemma of having to separate the shots where he deliberately and beautifully exploited grain—like the famous shot of Annie and Alvy standing on a pier at twilight with the East River bridges arrayed behind them—from the ones that are overrun with grain because the elements for the transfer probably weren’t the best.

As for the sound—come on, this is a Woody Allen movie. One of Allen’s greatest strengths as a  filmmaker is the ability to make his material compelling without relying on CGI, flashy editing, explosions, or other gratuitous effects. This is moviemaking stripped down to its essence, and it can be cleansing to luxuriate in a piece of cinema that doesn’t pivot on its ability to mercilessly abuse you.

Forget that this is supposed to be a romantic comedy. Forget about its Oscars. Forget about the well-heeled mob of Hollywood conformists bleating for Allen’s blood. Approach Annie Hall as an adventurous and innovative and unusually honest piece of filmmaking and you’ll get the chance to experience—or re-experience—one of the best American films of the final quarter of the last century, the movie that helped start the wave that brought New York back from the dead, for better or worse.

Michael Gaughn—The Absolute Sound, The Perfect Vision, Wideband, Stereo Review, Sound & Vision, The Rayva Roundtablemarketing, product design, some theater designs, a couple TV shows, some commercials, and now this.

PICTURE | This HD presentation feels flatter than it should—not unwatchable, just flat

SOUND | Come on, this is a Woody Allen movie

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

© 2023 Cineluxe LLC

Scroll to top

sign up for our newsletter

receive a monthly recap of everything that’s new on Cineluxe