• Type:
  • Genre:
  • Duration:
  • Average Rating:

Kaleidescape

Review: Anatomy of a Murder

Logo
Anatomy of a Murder (1959)

review | Anatomy of a Murder

also on Cineluxe

Sign up for our monthly newsletter
to stay up to date on Cineluxe

Held together by Jimmy Stewart’s career-defining performance, this epic-length courtroom drama looks exceptionally good in the 4K HDR

by Michael Gaughn
December 23, 2022

The second American Renaissance (c. 1955 to 1962) spawned a whole slew of mainstream iconoclasts. Coltrane, Mingus, and Monk in jazz, Weegee in photography, Warhol in art, Glenn Gould in classical music, Lenny Bruce in comedy, Ginsberg in poetry, and Aldrich, Kubrick, and Sirk in the movies all stand at the beginning of the long and fecund list that sums up the tenor of that time, an era that coughed up more cultural radicals than any other. 

Director Otto Preminger was a provocateur, a bad boy, but he was never an iconoclast. He very much wanted to be seen as being a member of that club but his interest in transgression didn’t run deep. He was mainly interested in breaking taboos as a way to grab headlines and fill theater seats. At the end of the day, he was a guy who made the occasional intriguing film but was essentially a workmanlike director with a penchant for publicity. 

All of which makes it curious that his Anatomy of a Murder has just received a 4K HDR release. I could name a couple hundred movies that deserved that attention long before Anatomy. The way titles are chosen for 4K is so random it almost feels like it’s being done by lottery. 

To be clear, I actually like Anatomy of a Murder. I’ve liked it ever since I was a kid and sneaked downstairs late at night to watch it once everyone else in the family was asleep. And it always held my attention, even at its almost three-hour run time and arbitrarily broken up by a seemingly endless number of commercials. It’s a talky film, a courtroom drama that takes almost a whole hour to get to the courtroom, and yet somehow works, despite problems—partly because it was made at the right moment in time so that the whole of the culture helps prop it up, but mainly because of Jimmy Stewart.

To start with that propping up, Anatomy springs from the trend toward gritty documentary-style dramas that began with The Naked City in 1948 (which were themselves inspired by the Neo Realist films out of post-World War II Italy). That style really didn’t take root until the mid ‘50s, only to be erased by the emerging tumult of the early ‘60s, to then re-emerge, more heavily stylized, in the early ‘70s in movies like The French Connection, Taxi Driver, and urban exploitation films—only to be once again obliterated, likely forever, by the emergence of fantasy and blockbuster movies in the late ‘70s.

Anatomy has a down-at-the-heels look appropriate to a small industrial city in Michigan in the late ‘50s. Shot on location, nothing was done to spruce up the decay that had begun to envelop the country as the post-war boom began to fade. That tack can make many films of the era feel just tawdry and depressing but it works here because the actors bring a heightened enough presence to the action to offer sufficient relief from the gloom—though it has to be pointed out that they overdid it with Stewart’s house, which is so relentlessly filthy it’s hard to believe somebody like Stewart would ever live in a dump like that. 

Casting was never Preminger’s strong suit, so what you get here is incredibly hit and miss. Arthur O’Connell and Eve Arden do what they can with the hoary clichés of the alcoholic, washed-up attorney eager for redemption and the wisecracking underpaid and unappreciated secretary. Joseph Welch does an outstanding turn as the crotchety but droll and benign judge. And Murray “Mayor Vaughn” Hamilton is estimable as ever in his patented role of arrogant and put-upon schlemiel. You can only feel sorry for Brooks West as the easily duped district attorney—the weakest link in the script and casting, who’s present just to be Stewart’s straw man. And while Lee Remick constantly grabs the camera’s attention, even in the crowded courtroom scenes, it all comes a cropper whenever she has to open her mouth and attempt to act. 

Adding to the challenge is the use of locals as extras, who are fascinating to look at because they’re unvarnished reflections of the time. But the distance between them and that teeming gaggle of Hollywood actors is so extreme it almost topples the artifice by making clear the near infinite distance between those two worlds.

But, again, Anatomy is really all about Stewart, who was that rarity of being as much actor as star and throughout the ‘50s brought a maturity to his roles that audiences weren’t used to seeing from A-listers. His ability had always been evident—his performance in Mr. Smith Goes to Washington takes Capra’s precious, flawed bromides to a level he was never able to achieve via other actors—but Stewart, by sublimating his experiences in World War II, heightened movie acting in a way that’s never fully been appreciated. 

What he accomplished here is truly a feat—holding together an epic-length film that’s almost all dialogue by his performance alone. It’s especially fascinating to watch him take his evolved version of classic movie acting and use it to go toe to toe with Actors Studio types like George C. Scott and Ben Gazzara, who both, in their “we’re too good to be here” way, attempt to devour most of the scenery. There’s something about Stewart not only being able to single-handedly hold the picture together but dispatch these upstarts without breaking a sweat that’s both exhilarating and triumphant. 

Anatomy of a Murder looks damn good in 4K HDR—especially for a production that deliberately didn’t have a lot of polish. While there’s the constant bugaboo of elements on either side of dissolves looking compromised—especially problematic here since Preminger tended to rely on longer takes—they’re never quite as awful as the similar elements in Creature from the Black Lagoon. Anatomy, for the most part, looks like film, making it easy to stay immersed in the movie. While it’s neither as faithful or compelling as the transfer for Hitchcock’s Shadow of a Doubt, nothing happens along the way to jolt you out of the experience. The quality of the transfer is especially evident in many of the medium and tighter shots, where you really couldn’t ask for anything more. The one significant nit is that the HDR grade does occasionally make shots look a little plasticy or video-like—a fleeting annoyance; nothing persistent.

The audio is for the most part clean and well balanced—although there’s a scene in Stewart’s house near the end that’s oddly several dB lower than everything around it. The only times the dynamic range really comes to the fore are when Duke Ellington’s band is strangely grafted into the movie, which sound fine but really don’t add anything to the overall impact. I do once again have to point out that this is yet another older film where the original mono mix is nowhere to be found. I don’t understand the point of getting the look of a movie within striking distance of how it was originally presented and then playing fast and loose with the audio.

This might be the simplest and most definitive conclusion I’ve ever written: Watch Anatomy of a Murder just to savor Jimmy Stewart at the peak of his powers. This a sly act of virtuosity done with modest, almost humble, bravura by a performer too often enjoyed but not appreciated, too often passed over as just a comfortable old shoe. There is everything to be learned about movies and movie acting by watching Stewart rise so far above both the material and its execution and do the impossible without ever once succumbing to the temptation to pat himself on the back. 

Michael Gaughn—The Absolute Sound, The Perfect Vision, Wideband, Stereo Review, Sound & Vision, The Rayva Roundtablemarketing, product design, some theater designs, a couple TV shows, some commercials, and now this.

PICTURE | Anatomy of a Murder looks damn good in 4K HDR, with the quality of the transfer especially evident in many of the medium and tighter shots

SOUND | The audio is for the most part clean and well balanced, although this is yet another release of an older film without the original mono mix

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

© 2023 Cineluxe LLC

Review: The Fabelmans

The Fabelmans (2022)

review | The Fabelmans

also on Cineluxe

Sign up for our monthly newsletter
to stay up to date on Cineluxe

Steven Spielberg’s thinly disguised autobiography bombed at the box office but is worth a look in its home release

by John Sciacca
December 21, 2022

The body of films directed, produced, and/or written by Steven Spielberg includes some of the most well-known and beloved movies of our time, and any new Spielberg film typically garners loads of attention. Especially when that film is so well received by critics (91% Rotten Tomatoes) and audiences (82% audience score) alike and has received five Golden Globe nominations including Best Motion Picture—Drama and Best Director, along with 11 nominations at the 28th Critics’ Choice Awards, including Best Picture. 

Which is what makes the disastrous box-office performance of The Fabelmans all the more surprising. With an estimated budget of $40 million, it barely made $160,000 in its opening weekend (to be fair, it opened in a very limited release, debuting on just four screens in New York and LA), going on to gross a measly $8 million worldwide. Which means you likely didn’t see The Fabelmans, and if you’re a Spielberg fan, you’re kinda missing out. 

While the film’s synopsis says this is “loosely based on Spielberg’s childhood,” an opening “names have been changed to protect the innocent” title card would be all that separates this from a film that could have just as easily been titled The Spielbergs. And while this movie written, directed, and produced by Spielberg is not an autobiography per se, it is so heavily based on and recreates events from his youth it probably holds more factual content than most actual biopics. Perhaps, though, a straight-up autobiography would have been too personal—or vain—for Spielberg, and as a filmmaker, it is a bit easier to distance himself from the events and remain behind the camera lens.

The two-hour 31-minute run-time can be a bit plodding. Don’t expect a lot of—or really any—action other than of the emotional kind. While I found the film interesting, scenes can drag a bit. 

Ultimately, this is a coming-of-age story, watching Sammy Fabelman (played by Mateo Zoryan as a youth and Gabriel LaBelle as a teenager) grow and be shaped by his family while discovering his passion for filmmaking and working on improving his craft. Sammy is raised in a supportive home by his mother, Mitzi (Michelle Williams), who was a concert pianist. She is artistic and ethereal and encourages Sammy’s filmmaking. Spielberg described his actual mother as being more of a big sister than a mother and a Peter Pan-type that never wanted to grow up, and Williams definitely captures that spirit. Sammy’s father, Burt (Paul Dano, miles away from his role as Riddler in The Batman), is an engineer whose successes at work result in career advancements that mean moves for the family. Equally important to the family dynamic is “best friend” Bennie played by Seth Rogan, who delivers a dramatic performance that reminded me a bit of his turn as Steve Wozniak in Steve Jobs. 

If the goal of this not-autobiography autobiography is to show us how Spielberg developed his love for movies and filmmaking, then mission accomplished. It opens with the family going to the cinema to see Sammy’s first movie, The Greatest Show on Earth. In it, a dramatic train wreck has such an impact on Sammy that he can only come to terms with it by filming and crashing a Lionel train set he received for Chanukah so he can watch it over and over. His staging and filming of the wreck (at least how it’s presented here) is reminiscent of the scene from Super 8, a film Spielberg executive produced. In fact, much of the way Spielberg works with friends and family to get his movies made has the same feel as Charles (Riley Griffiths) in Super 8.

The film’s length and pace give plenty of time to appreciate Sammy’s growing skills as a director, whether setting up shots, his eye for framing, or how he interacts and gives direction to actors. From his earliest home movies, Sammy starts making longer and more elaborate films from The Last Gunfight (the film Spielberg actually made to get his Boy Scout photography merit badge) to Escape to Nowhere, a 40-minute war movie that won First Prize in a statewide competition (you can view a couple minutes of the original Spielberg film here), to Firelight, a precursor to Close Encounters of the Third Kind. 

As is Spielberg’s preference, The Fabelmans is shot on actual 35mm film (16mm for some of the home movies) in a 1.85 aspect ratio, and the home transfer is taken from a 4K digital intermediate. Don’t expect this to be a go-to movie to show off your theater. While there are certainly some closeups that reveal loads of detail, like the fine texture and pebbling on a leather varsity jacket, overall this has a softer film look, not the razor sharpness of modern digital films. Also, much of the color palette is full of muted earth tones, with lots of browns, beiges, and tans. We do get some nice highlights from the HDR grading, such as bright lights from film projectors, a car headlight dance, or worklights in garages, but overall the goal is to have a natural, lifelike presentation.

The Kaleidescape release features a DTS-HD Master 5.1-channel audio mix, which is fine for presenting the mostly dialogue-driven film. We do get a bit of scene-appropriate ambience, like the low buzz of fluorescent lights in a school hallway, rustling winds from a swirling tornado, outdoor sounds like wind and insects, passing of traffic, or the whirring click of a film projector spinning. The soundtrack, which often includes piano music in deference to Spielberg’s mother, Leah, is given some width across the front as well as mixed up to the ceiling to expand the soundstage. Your subs will be taking the night off for the most part, though they do come into play during the big train collision, which produces some nice, deep rumble. 

If you’re a Spielberg fan, this is definitely a movie you’ll want to see, as it accurately depicts his early life and influences. One benefit of the film’s poor box-office performance is that it received a fast-track release to the home market. After getting a wide cinematic release on November 23, it was released to digital retailers like Kaleidescape on December 13, so you can appreciate it in the comfort of your own theater now. 

Probably the most experienced writer on custom installation in the industry, John Sciacca is co-owner of Custom Theater & Audio in Murrells Inlet, South Carolina, & is known for his writing for such publications as Residential Systems and Sound & Vision. Follow him on Twitter at @SciaccaTweets and at johnsciacca.com.

PICTURE | Shot on 35mm, some closeups reveal loads of detail, but overall The Fabelmans has a softer look instead of the razor sharpness of modern digital films

SOUND | The DTS-HD Master 5.1 mix is fine for presenting the mostly dialogue-driven film but there is a bit of scene-appropriate ambience

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

© 2023 Cineluxe LLC

Review: Pulp Fiction

Pulp Fiction (1994)

review | Pulp Fiction

The Tarantino classic gets a 4K HDR upgrade that stays remarkably true to its elegantly gritty filmic look

by Dennis Burger
December 19, 2022

It’s funny how watching a beloved film with a critical eye rather than through a fan’s rose-tinted glasses will force you to articulate things you’ve always been perfectly happy to leave nebulous. I’ve frankly never given much thought to why Pulp Fiction is one of only three Tarantino films I genuinely adore. I’ve made vague allusions to the off-putting cruelty of Reservoir Dogs and Inglourious Basterds, the meandering self-indulgence of Jackie Brown, the unflinching sadism of Django Unchained and The Hateful Eight—in short, I have excuses for why I’m bothered by the films of his that bother me, and I still haven’t entirely made my mind up about Once Upon a Time in Hollywood. But I’ve never even stopped to seriously consider why Pulp Fiction, Kill Bill, and Death Proof resonate so hard with me.

I think I found a clue in the opening credits during this, what must have been my 50th viewing of Tarantino’s sophomore directorial effort: “Stories by Quentin Tarantino & Roger Avary.” You don’t see a lot of ampersands in Tarantino’s opening or closing credits sequences, at least not as pertains to story or script. But it turns out the only films of his that truly work for me are, in some way or another, collaborative in their original conception.

It’s difficult to deny that Pulp Fiction holds a special spot in the filmmaker’s oeuvre, and that Avary’s contributions—primarily the story of boxer Butch Coolidge, played by Bruce Willis—give the narrative a little more heart and humanity than is typical of Tarantino’s work. But it’s also difficult to deny the quotability of nearly every line of dialogue, the effectiveness of the near-constant dark humor, nor the exceptional plotting and pacing, all of which QT deserves credit for. 

I’m guessing at the mere mention of the name of the film, many cinephiles of a certain vintage can immediately recall its most salient elements. But Pulp Fiction is one of those rare modern films in which the individual parts and the sum thereof are of relatively equal merit. Its moments may be burned into your memory but how they unfold and entangle and interconnect from one to the next is the bulk of the reason for the enduring power of Pulp Fiction to surprise and delight nearly any time you watch it. 

Mind you, that’s true of the film whether you watch it on Laserdisc, VHS, DVD, Blu-ray, or the new UHD/HDR release from, of all studios, Paramount, a fact that unnerved me when I realized it. The studio doesn’t have the most consistent track record when it comes to 4K remasters so there’s the obvious question of whether you’re going to end up with a Godfather or a Godfather Part II. 

Thankfully, it’s the latter. Granted, the elements of Pulp Fiction are newer and have been much better preserved, but it looks like aside from recompositing some titles, the only thing the restorers and graders behind this new release did was scan the negative, set the peak brightness level at something resembling the intensity of projected film, and pat themselves on the back for a job not done. 

Which is, exactly how it ought to be. Pulp Fiction in 4K positively brims with organic but exceedingly fine grain and the sort of gorgeous halation you get with 35mm film. The golden hues of its Eastman stock haven’t been diddled with a bit, most of the expanded dynamic range comes from the lower end of the value scale, and the color palette just has a weensy bit more room to breathe without bumping into the limits of the smaller gamut of older home video formats.

In short, this release just looks like film, and although Kaleidescape’s release is limited to HDR10, I’m not seeing anything here that would benefit from the dynamic metadata of the Dolby Vision version released on UHD Blu-ray and iTunes. What I am seeing is a wealth of textures and details that legitimately add to the experience of watching the film. It’s not razor-sharp and shouldn’t be—thank goodness no one saw fit to scrub and sharpen the film once it was scanned, and even the minor amount of edge enhancement found on the most recent Blu-ray seems to be missing—but it’s now easier to see little elements that have been obscured by previous home video releases. The tiny details to be found in Jack Rabbit Slim’s now read so clearly that Vince’s line, “It’s like a wax museum with a pulse,” lands so much harder because it feels so much truer. And it’s hard not to miss the grime on the walls of Butch’s grimy motel room now, nor the title of Modesty Blaise the first time we see Vince clutching it.

The enhanced and unfettered detail of this new scan also more clearly reveals the character of the medium at times. As Butch and Esmeralda Villalobos speed away from his final fight in the latter’s cab, you can see cinematographer Andrzej Sekula struggling to pull focus while trying to capture fast-moving action at night with an anamorphic lens. Later, you can more clearly see the artifacts of the split diopter as Butch runs around a corner to hide from a distant Marsellus Wallace and both have to remain in focus.

Far from distracting from the experience, though, these little quirks serve as a technical indicator of something Tarantino is constantly reminding us of with narrative and other cinematic techniques: There’s a reason this film wasn’t called Based on a True Story. This isn’t how real life works. This is pastiche. This is homage. And there’s something curious about the fact that a pristine scan of the original elements, which makes the imagery more three-dimensional and beautifully resolved than ever before, legitimately serves to subtly enhance and underscore the inherent and intentional tawdry artifice of it all. 

The only thing I would change about the presentation is the audio. And no, I don’t want a new Dolby Atmos remix. But I do think Pulp Fiction would benefit from a new nearfield mix specifically for home cinema. 

Kaleidescape’s DTS-HD Master Audio 5.1 track sounds identical to the one found on all of the film’s sundry Blu-ray releases, and it’s pretty great overall. It’s wonderfully dynamic and, due to QT’s disdain for ADR, all of the dialogue has a natural  “in the room” quality I dig quite a bit. You’ll push your center speaker to its limits, and if your sound system is up to snuff, you’ll even notice some little character flaws like the saturation-verging-on-clipping of Sam Jackson’s voice as he forcefully yells his mangled Biblical mantra at the soon-to-be-ex-Brett.  

The only problem with the sound is that the surround channels are mixed for a room that’s 50 feet wide or more, not 25 feet or less. They’re a bit too high in the mix and occasionally impose on not only dialogue but also the sense of scale. It’s not a major deal—it’s 95% of the way there as is. But a good nearfield re-recording mixer could have transformed this release from near-perfect to transcendental. 

One other nit to pick is that Paramount is being precious with its bonus features again. The Kaleidescape release lacks all of the bonus goodies found on the new UHD Blu-ray, which to be fair were pulled from the original special edition DVD and a couple of subsequent Blu-ray releases. You can find most of them on YouTube, but it would be nice to have the deleted scenes and especially the retrospective feature Not the Usual Mindless Boring Getting to Know You Chit Chat collected with the film itself. 

So if you own an older copy of the film that includes those supplements, perhaps hang onto it. But one way or another, if you’re a fan of Pulp Fiction, you need to see this new scan, and Kaleidescape’s download is an excellent way of acquiring it. 

Dennis Burger is an avid Star Wars scholar, Tolkien fanatic, and Corvette enthusiast who somehow also manages to find time for technological passions including high-end audio, home automation, and video gaming. He lives in the armpit of Alabama with his wife Bethany and their four-legged child Bruno, a 75-pound American Staffordshire Terrier who thinks he’s a Pomeranian.

PICTURE | Pulp Fiction in 4K positively brims with organic but exceedingly fine grain and the sort of gorgeous halation you get with 35mm film. It also offers a wealth of textures and details that legitimately add to the experience of watching the film.

SOUND | The DTS-HD Master Audio 5.1 track is pretty great overall but the surround channels are mixed for a room that’s 50 feet wide or more, not 25 feet or less

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

© 2023 Cineluxe LLC

Review: Black Adam

Black Adam (2022)

review | Black Adam

This latest romp through the DC universe is ultimately unsatisfying—mainly because it doesn’t let The Rock be The Rock

by John Sciacca
November 29, 2022

I’m a fan of superhero movies. And I’m a fan of Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson. Though I never watched him as a wrestler, I think he’s developed into an actor who chooses roles that really suit his persona and comedic timing, like Fast & Furious Presents Hobbs & Shaw, Jumani, and Jungle Cruise. And if you haven’t given his TV series Young Rock a chance—where he frequently plays off Randall Park—you should give it a watch.

So, I figured Black Adam, the latest entry into DC’s expanding cinematic universe, would be something of a layup, especially after The Rock talked it up so much and shared the grueling training regiment he put himself through to get into hero shape. So when the digital version dropped on Kaleidescape just 30 days after its cinematic release, I grabbed it and planned a family movie night.

But as much as I expected—and even wanted—to enjoy Black Adam, the movie just didn’t work for me. So much of it felt like ripoffs from what other movies had already done. The opening and even the city name of Khandaq felt like Wakanda from Black Panther. Khandaq has a special, powerful, and rare mineral called “eternium,” which, again, was like Panther’s vibranium (or even Avatar’s “unobtanium”). Dr. Fate (Pierce Brosnan) and his powers felt like things we’ve already seen better from Dr. Strange. The Justice Society has a campus along with a hidden super-jet that is straight out of X-Men. Plus we’ve already had a much more fun movie about Shazam called Shazam!

Now, I can forgive some cinematic borrowing. For all I know, Black Adam’s comic-book origins predate all of these other films. But it feels like in its quest to create a cohesive cinematic world and tie in different heroes and stories, DC has forgotten that the story also needs to be interesting, entertaining, and make sense for those new to the franchise trying to follow along. There were just too many moments where I was wondering, “Wait. Why is this happening?” or, “Who is that guy?” 

DC does its best to shoehorn in some connection to its bigger universe, with the walls of young Amon’s (Bodhi Sabongui) room covered with posters and paraphernalia of other DC stars like Superman, Batman, Wonder Woman, and Aquaman. (Plus, there is a mid-credits scene that places Black Adam right in the heart of the DC heroes.) Ultimately, the film seems most interested in just getting to the next big effects-laden fight scene where multiple heroes from the Justice Society battle Black Adam, this international mercenary group called the Intergang, or otherworldly superbeings, flying around, smashing and destroying things while trying to find and take control of the Crown of Sabbac, a 23-pound crown made from pure eternium that gives the wearer great power. To be fair, the battles are cool, especially when they go into ultra-slo-mo to show how Black Adam “sees” things (again, similar to the Quicksilver effect from the X-Men films). 

Beyond any of that, though, what Black Adam is really missing is any fun and heart, the key ingredients Kevin Feige and Marvel have learned to include in just the right amounts. In trying to make him this dark antihero who kills his enemies—sometimes in manners worthy of Mortal Kombat or reminiscent of the opening-the-ark scene from Raiders of the Lost Ark—instead of bringing them in to face justice, they robbed The Rock of any chance to be The Rock. Sure, we get a Johnson looking as big and menacing as ever, but any CGI’d strong man could have filled the suit.

Fortunately, for home theater owners, Black Adam looks and sounds great. Shot on Arri at 4.5K resolution, the home transfer is taken from a 4K digital intermediate, and images look clean, polished, and terrific throughout. Closeups have incredibly sharp detail and clarity, showing single strands of hair, whiskers, and all the pores in actors’ faces, the bulging veins in The Rock’s head, cracks and texture in rocks, stones, and buildings, or the finest details in clothing, like the etchings in Black Adam’s suit. Though this ultra-clarity and detail comes at the expense of some of the effects and environments, revealing their CGI roots. 

The HDR effects are also abundant and on frequent display during the many fight scenes and make for some stunning visuals. There is glowing red-orange molten fire and vibrant blossoming explosions, bright eye-searing blue-white electrical bolts, the glinting gold from Hawkman’s (Aldis Hodge) suit, along with bright glistening beads of sweat. There are bright flashlights shining in darkened caves, sunlight streaming into darkened rooms, and a “tour” through Khandaq lit up at night. Visually, Black Adam is a treat to watch, and it will push your projector’s light output and tone mapping to its limits.

Equally impressive is the Dolby TrueHD Atmos soundtrack, which immerses you in ways both subtle and bombastic. In some of the external scenes, your listening room will transform into the mountains of Khandaq with the sounds of picks hammering away at rock around you, or you’ll hear the echo of voices, the rumbling and chatter of crowds, or the rustle of wind and sounds of birds. 

And when the action kicks in, so do the sound and volume. You’ll hear Black Adam whooshing off and out of the room, Hawkman and Intergang bikes flying and swooping overhead, Cyclone (Quintessa Swindell) swirling wind and debris all around, Dr. Fate’s voice booming overhead, things falling down—or flying up—into the ceiling, plus all manner of damage and destruction as things are hurled and smashed all around the room. And when something explodes, enemies collide, Black Adam charges through a wall, or the Justice Society jet roars past, the bass kicks in, energizing the room with low-frequency effects you’ll feel. 

Black Adam currently has an 89% audience rating on Rotten Tomatoes so clearly it resonated with many viewers. And even if you only watch the film once, you’ll likely turn to some of the six pre-bookmarked Kaleidescape scenes in order to show off your system when guests come over, wowing them with the stunning visuals and immersive audio. Plus, with the film still in theaters, you can enjoy it in the highest quality in the comfort of your own home theater via the Kaleidescape download a full 45-days before the 4K disc comes out early next year. 

Probably the most experienced writer on custom installation in the industry, John Sciacca is co-owner of Custom Theater & Audio in Murrells Inlet, South Carolina, & is known for his writing for such publications as Residential Systems and Sound & Vision. Follow him on Twitter at @SciaccaTweets and at johnsciacca.com.

PICTURE | The HDR effects are abundant and on frequent display during the many fight scenes, making for some stunning visuals

SOUND | The impressive Dolby TrueHD Atmos soundtrack immerses you in ways both subtle and bombastic

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

© 2023 Cineluxe LLC

Review: Casablanca

Casablanca (1942)

review | Casablanca

related content

Sign up for our monthly newsletter
to stay up to date on Cineluxe

The Bogart/Bergman classic looks sharp, punchy, and clean in 4K HDR—but does it look like film?

by Michael Gaughn
November 11, 2022

You’ll know within the first three minutes if you’ll be able to roll with Casablanca in 4K HDR. The images behind the opening narration have always looked a little cheesy, even on VHS and DVD. But while the optical pan down from the minaret over a matte painting to the streets of Casablanca has always been suspect, it’s never drawn inordinate attention to itself—which is what the filmmakers, working with a less than ideal budget, were hoping for. But the painting looks laughably bad now, like an art-class backdrop for a high-school play. 

And that goes right to the heart of my contention: If you come to Casablanca in 4K HDR expecting it to look like film, you’ll be quickly disillusioned. But if you’re OK with enhancements and manipulations and accents that make everything look distinctly digital—although not quite like video—you’ll be able to stick around for the duration with an untroubled conscience. 

It might sound like I’m completely dumping on this transfer. I’m not. It’s possible to peer through what’s been done and glimpse enough of what Michael Curtiz, Arthur Edeson, et al. originally created to enjoy the 4K ride. But it is a little troubling to think this could be what a lot of the most popular classics will look like going forward—not as egregious as what was done to The Godfather but troubling still.

Just to make sure I wasn’t projecting some weird bias onto what I was watching, I spotchecked Casablanca against the 4K HDR presentation of Hitchcock’s Shadow of a Doubt. From the first shot, picked at random, Doubt looked like film. The image was clean, the grain was restrained, and you could see where HDR had helped open everything up, but nothing—there or elsewhere—felt over-processed, like the movie had been possessed by overeager digital gnomes. 

Would Hitchcock have approved of the result? Probably not, but at no point does that transfer feel like a reinterpretation let alone a desecration. But then Doubt isn’t wrapped in the nostalgic, iconic, mythic glow that enshrouds Casablanca—which means it doesn’t have to try to fend for itself against the enormous marketing pressures that come with being that popular and that revered. 

Admittedly, Edeson’s photography for Casablanca has more of a high-gloss sheen than Joseph Valentine’s for Doubt, but it’s not like Hitchcock’s film lacks visual polish and style, and it’s not like what threw me in Casablanca had much to do with things like lighting, lenses, or filters. The manipulation is most noticeable in the skin tones. I’m not sure why the HDR decided to pick on poor Paul Henreid in particular, already saddled with the sappiest role in the film, and with having to play it with a steel rod up his ass to boot, but the makeover makes it look like he’s stitched together out of Naugahyde. After a while, you feel like you’re watching a video-game Victor Laszlo. And once you’re aware of that, everything in the film starts to look plasticy with everyone resembling giant marionettes, which is more than a little creepy.  

Because there were also some odd things going on with the 4K of The Apartment, I bounced that off Casablanca as well. The former must have been the product of a different bag of tricks, though, because while the look of both is off to about the same degree, the Wilder film has a tube-camera early-TV appearance that’s nowhere to be found in Casablanca. (It remains strange that The Apartment looks like an HDR transfer even though it’s straight 4K.)

I also have to once again shine a light on the curious practice of not including the original mono mix of a film with what’s supposed to be its highest-quality presentation. Theoretically, the 4K HDR version should be the one that comes closest to honoring the filmmakers’ intentions (although, as we’ve seen, that isn’t always the case). Why then give viewers no choice but to listen to a version of the soundtrack the filmmakers had nothing to do with?

I don’t have much to say about the movie itself since countless volumes, most of them paperweights, have already been written about it and trying to counter the consensual view would be like trying to push water. But I would like to emphasize how sophisticated—mature—Casablanca is, like many of the films of the ’40s—far more so than their counterparts today, which show little interest in rising above the adolescent wallowing that’s the basic price of admission to contemporary cinema. 

I’d also like to echo the legions of others who’ve expressed admiration for Curtiz’ technique. This was someone who really knew how to move a camera. And no other director has ever gotten as much mileage out of the shimmer of satin and silk. 

I need to be clear in closing that I don’t have a problem with 4K either with or without HDR. I’d be grateful for as many straight 4K transfers like The Good, the Band and the Ugly as possible, and we’ve heard director Barry Sonnenfeld praise the 4K transfer of When Harry Met Sally, a film he shot. As for HDR transfers, if they all at least aspired to the level of Shadow of a Doubt or Vertigo or The Shining or A Clockwork Orange, all would be right with the classic-film world. But higher resolution, with its tendency to expose both imperfections in the source material and any digital manipulation thereof, can be an awful harsh mistress. While it would of course be great if all older movies were handled as well as Doubt, etc., the treatment of Casablanca and The Godfather at one end of the spectrum and Creature from the Black Lagoon at the other suggests that anyone who deeply cares about the look of film as film is in for a bumpy ride. 

Michael Gaughn—The Absolute Sound, The Perfect Vision, Wideband, Stereo Review, Sound & Vision, The Rayva Roundtablemarketing, product design, some theater designs, a couple TV shows, some commercials, and now this.

PICTURE | Undeniably clean but apparently over-processed, giving the movie a plastic look that feels far more digital than analog

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

© 2023 Cineluxe LLC

Review: Three Thousand Years of Longing

Three Thousand Years of Longing (2022)

review | Three Thousand Years of Longing

ALSO ON CINELUXE

Sign up for our monthly newsletter
to stay up to date on Cineluxe

George Miller’s meditation on folklore, myth, and storytelling almost works but falls just short of its goals 

by Dennis Burger
November 4, 2022

I spent most of George Miller’s Three Thousand Years of Longing consumed by thoughts of “bukimi no tani genshō,” aka “The Uncanny Valley.” The term, on the off chance you’re not familiar with it, is often used to describe our discomfort with 3D animations, especially of humans, that are almost lifelike but just miss the mark. And indeed, there’s a lot of 3D animation in this film that’s almost excellent, but that’s not the main reason I struggled so much.

Instead, I think it’s because Miller almost made a really wonderful film here but dropped the ball in a few key areas. For one thing, Three Thousand Years of Longing purports to be a story about the value of storytelling. Indeed, it’s an adaptation of A.S. Byatt’s excellent short story, The Djinn in the Nightingale’s Eye, from the collection of the same name. 

The thing is, if you’re going to tell a tale about the power of tales, then the tale you’re telling needs to be powerfully told, and there’s just something a little too detached about the way Miller tells this one for it to truly resonate. It falls prey to its own criticisms, approaching folklore and mythology a bit too analytically and intellectually, with not nearly enough heart. This despite the fact that leads Tilda Swinton and Idris Elba give it their all. The reality is, the trappings and style of the film—combined with the way it was shot—make their best efforts seem merely almost sincere, almost heartfelt.

The biggest thing working against this film’s humanity is its visuals. Shot by an out-of-retirement John Seale at 4.5K in ArriRaw, and finished in a 4K digital intermediate, the imagery hasn’t been film-looked at all. No faux grain, no synthesized halation, just straight, pristine, impossibly sharp out-of-the-box video with a bit of color grading. And while that unvarnished look works well for the scenes in which Swinton and Elba merely sit in the same room and speak to one another, when there’s any digital effects work—and there almost always is—the shocking clarity of the picture shines a laser beam on the disquieting nigh-verisimilitude of the computer graphics. 

Even the most banal FX work—a composite of Swinton’s character riding a bus through the streets of London, for example—isn’t quite stylized enough to register as intentionally stylized but isn’t quite believable enough to fool the eye. Every shot involving any amount of compositing also looks more like a popup book than a proper motion picture. But that doesn’t seem to be an intentional aesthetic choice. So we’re left with this weird middle ground where the viewer can’t quite buy into the fairy-tale reality of the story.

The one major exception is the sound. This is, without question, the best Dolby Atmos mix of the year so far and Kaleidescape presents it wonderfully. It’s an aggressive one, and I know I’m on record as not liking those, but what makes it work is that sound designer/supervising sound editor Robert Mackenzie demonstrates a masterful understanding of the way our brains process audio in the real world, and as such the mix doesn’t feel like it’s glomming to every surface of the room. Instead, it uses sound to transform the listening space. 

I’ll give you just one example—one of my favorites. Early on, there’s a lecture being given in an auditorium, and the mix employs Atmos to excellent effect to recreate the acoustics of the space. But it’s not voices merely bouncing off the ceiling and the walls that makes it work—it’s the timing of such. There’s a delay between the reverberance of the ceiling and the reverberance of the rear wall that’s absolutely transformative. 

Creative intermixing of sound effects both diegetic and dramatic provides some much-needed glue I wish had been mimicked in other areas of the making of the film. Had the script benefited from one more pass to reinforce the themes and trim some fat, and had the finished digital intermediate been printed to 35mm then scanned back to digital to smooth over some of the razor-sharp edges and add some organic chaos, I think Three Thousand Years of Longing could have really worked. 

In its released state, though, it teeters right on the edge of “noble failure” territory. It’s not a failure, mind you. In fact, it’s one of the year’s most ambitious and fascinating major-studio releases. But the fact that it comes so close to being something special without crossing that threshold makes it incredibly frustrating.

Dennis Burger is an avid Star Wars scholar, Tolkien fanatic, and Corvette enthusiast who somehow also manages to find time for technological passions including high-end audio, home automation, and video gaming. He lives in the armpit of Alabama with his wife Bethany and their four-legged child Bruno, a 75-pound American Staffordshire Terrier who thinks he’s a Pomeranian.

PICTURE | The imagery hasn’t been film-looked at all—just impossibly sharp video with a bit of color grading, which shines a laser beam on the flaws in the computer graphics

SOUND | The best Atmos mix of the year so far—an aggressive one, but it doesn’t feel like it’s glomming to every surface of the room, instead using sound to transform the listening space 

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

© 2023 Cineluxe LLC

Review: Creature from the Black Lagoon

Creature from the Black Lagoon (1954)

review | Creature from the Black Lagoon

also on Cineluxe

Sign up for our monthly newsletter
to stay up to date on Cineluxe

The movie that made guys running around in latex monster suits a thing would seem like a curious choice for a 4K HDR makeover

by Michael Gaughn
November 3, 2022

You can’t lump the work of an entire decade of filmmaking under one umbrella but the movies that best define the ‘50s all exhibit a kind goofy optimism—which is kind of weird given that the culture was grappling with the recent shocks of global war, economic depression, and genocide and with the new threats of nuclear annihilation and ever-lurking Communism. But I guess unbridled prosperity cures all ills. You can feel that almost reckless sanguinity almost everywhere in the era’s movies—in the musicals and comedies, of course, but also in the melodramas (something Douglas Sirk had a field day with), noir (Kiss Me Deadly), and even sci-fi and horror. That odd ebullience is still seductive—which helps explain the continuing appeal of Mid Century Modern. And of what would otherwise be tedious monster movies like Creature from the Black Lagoon.

Universal recently brought out some of its classic horror films, like Creature, The Mummy (1932), Phantom of the Opera (1943), and Bride of Frankenstein, in 4K HDR. My first instinct was to go for Bride of Frankenstein, which remains fascinating, mainly because it shows the monster genre veering into self-parody almost from its inception, but I thought Creature, being more recent, would be a better candidate for HDR. I should have trusted my gut. 

This is the kind of film that fascinated me as a kid but became harder to slog through once I developed a sense of how movies are made and what they’re capable of expressing. It’s a necessary skepticism that comes with the loss of innocence—the tradeoff of naive pleasure for insight—but some films can be really tough going once you can see their technical and aesthetic seams are showing.

Creature was a cut above the usual monster flick of the day but still far from A-list. The presence of Whit Bissell alone (who last appeared in these pages via Invasion of the Body Snatchers) tells you you’re solidly in the realm of the lucky to have an acting job. That impression is bolstered by the presence of Richard (It Came from Outer Space, Tormented) Carlson, who looked equally out of place in whatever film he was in and was probably one of the least convincing actors to ever have his name above the title. And then there’s the lone female presence, the oddly visaged Julie Adams, who obviously got the role solely on the strength of her breasts.

There’s also the defining ‘50s trope of kill what you don’t understand (actually a shade more enlightened than our current paradigm of kill anything that moves), here tempered a little by Carlson’s pleas—until the creature snatches his girl and then all bets are off. And of course the monster starts by polishing off the coolies before working his way up the ethnic pecking order. 

The two things that are fair to expect from even a B-level horror movie are some kind of sustained mood and at least a yeoman-like effort to create tension within the set pieces. What Creature has instead is a bunch of alpha males swarming all over the desirable female, a boat stuck in a lagoon, and an iconic latex monster suit—and a both rote and turgid score. You come to dread hearing the monster’s theme more than seeing the monster himself.

But enough with beating up on a defenseless old movie. Let’s discuss the transfer. To sum it up before laying out my case: This is another instance of 4K HDR accentuating all the flaws of a film that wasn’t that well shot to begin with and whose elements have likely deteriorated over time. That’s not to say HDR and black & white can’t be friends—just look at Shadow of a Doubt to see a movie—and the experience of a movie—brought back with all its original impact intact. 

But Creature is all over the map visually, with some shots crisp, some so soft they look like VHS (and that is not an exaggeration), some in nicely gradated black & white, some in a muddy wash vaguely resembling sepia. Everything going in and out of dissolves looks like it’s been dipped in acid, and some of the underwater photography is so vague it resembles a 16mm art film—Maya Deren Meets the Creature. 

Given that, it seems almost unfair to bring the movie out this way. It’s unfortunately becoming common with UHD releases of older titles that you have to look past the compromised footage while waiting for the good shots to show up, which isn’t a very pleasant way to watch a film. Of course, as many classics as possible should be re-released in 4K—we’re all better off being able to see 2001, Singin’ in the Rain, Vertigo, and The Good, the Bad and the Ugly in that format. But here—and I admittedly haven’t yet seen any of the other titles Universal has released in its horror bundle—I have to wonder if this wasn’t more about “let’s get them to buy the title yet one more time” than anything else. 

It was literally hard to see what the extended dynamic range brought to the presentation. The flashbulb whites made the “In The Beginning . . .” shots of primordial creation look blown out and the flames streaming off the creature look animated (they aren’t). The flame in the lamp that hangs over poor Whit Bissell right before he’s attacked was so vivid it looked matted in. And you’d at least expect the lagoon in a movie with “Black Lagoon” in the title to look blacker. It didn’t. 

I’m not sure what fans of the film will make of this presentation. Maybe, having looked past its visual flaws in the earlier incarnations they’ll be willing to forgive them being heavily underscored here. My take is that drawing too much attention to the technical lapses makes you that much more aware of everything else that’s wrong. But you can’t expect a well-intended but inept ‘50s creature-on-the-loose throwaway to look like Citizen Kane.

Sorry—bad example.

Michael Gaughn—The Absolute Sound, The Perfect Vision, Wideband, Stereo Review, Sound & Vision, The Rayva Roundtablemarketing, product design, some theater designs, a couple TV shows, some commercials, and now this.

PICTURE | All over the place—4K crisp and then VHS soft, with some occasional instances of blown-out HDR brightness

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

© 2023 Cineluxe LLC

Review: Castle Rock

Castle Rock (2019)

review | Castle Rock

This Stephen King-derived Hulu series can be slow at times but definitely delivers the requisite shocks and scares

by John Sciacca
January 31, 2019

“There is a lot of history in this town. Not all of it good . . .”

You might recall a post entitled “Exclusive Content Causes FOMO & Piracy” where I opined how all of these streaming providers coming up with their own content was really frustrating viewers. One of the shows that inspired that post was Castle Rock, a new Hulu original series that takes place in the Stephen King multiverse. 

Now, this is a show I really wanted to see when it was announced, as it checked all of my must-see programming boxes. J. J. Abrams involved? Check. Stephen King an executive producer? Check. Set in the Stephen King world with tons of King Easter eggs? Check. A solid cast featuring several actors who’ve previously been in King adaptations? Check. But, as much as I wanted to see Castle Rock, I was not willing to add another streaming subscription to my monthly credit-card statement. 

Fortunately, you can now experience Castle Rock without a Hulu subscription by purchasing the series on disc (4K UltraHD, Blu-ray, or DVD) or via digital download in HD quality at the Kaleidescape store, which is how I watched. 

Before I get into my review, we need a little background. The problem with turning a Stephen King novel into a film is that when you try to compress 800-plus pages into a two-hour runtime, you end up chopping out so much material that the results are often just pale reflections of the original. Or you go the other way, trying to stretch something that worked well as a 10- to 20-page short story into a two-hour feature that just blunders around lost. (Two of King’s best adaptations—Shawshank and Stand by Me—were actually novellas, providing just the right amount of source material.)

King adaptations tend to work especially well as miniseries, where the source material can be given the room it needs to develop story and characters over multiple hours. Hulu showed they knew how to handle this perfectly with its 2016 eight-episode miniseries 11.22.63, which also happened to be the first pairing of Abrams and King. 

Castle Rock is a 10-episode series that takes place in a small, fictional Maine town that will be familiar to King fans. (Other King works set there include The Dead Zone, Cujo, The Dark Half, Needful Things, and The Mist.) It’s important to stress that while King does get an executive producer credit, he wasn’t involved in crafting this story, or apparently much with the production, and that it isn’t based on any of his stories. 

Rather, Castle Rock is a new tale set in King’s established world and features numerous subtle and overt connections and allusions to previous King works. These include Sheriff Alan Pangborn (Scott Glenn); Diane “Jackie” Torrance (Jane Levy), niece of The Shining’s axe-wielding Jack Torrance; references to a certain rabid dog; events from The Body (which became Stand by Me); the Juniper Hill Psychiatric Hospital; and a certain prison no one wants to visit called Shawshank. 

The opening episode, “Severance,” does a nice job laying the groundwork for what to expect from the series along with introducing us to several principal characters, including death-row lawyer Henry Deaver (Andre Holland), who has his own troubled past connections with Castle Rock. He returns to the town after mysterious prisoner The Kid (Bill Skarsgard), who has apparently been kept locked in solitary confinement in a hidden section of Shawshank for years, utters Deaver’s name and nothing else. And there’s recently retired Shawshank warden Dale Lacy (Terry O’Quinn), who had been keeping The Kid locked away for reasons known only to himself. 

The series is slow in parts but definitely picks up near the end, with Episode 7, “The Queen,” being especially good and featuring a fantastic performance by Sissy Spacek as Ruth Deaver that really deserved some kind of award nomination. Another standout was the gore-filled eighth episode, “Past Perfect,” that actually had my wife scream out. 

There are some nice King-esque jump scares along the way, along with tons of general creepiness as we slowly move towards solving the mystery of who is The Kid and how did he get here, along with the overall question of, “Why is Castle Rock so rotten?” 

The video is mainly a palette of muted browns, grays, and cool blues but images are clean and detailed. Even better is the 5.1-channel DTS-HD audio mix, which does a wonderful job of keeping dialogue understandable while still delivering a lot of sonic atmospherics that certainly add to the experience when watched on a surround system. 

I appreciated the brief “Inside the Episode” rundowns for each episode by the series creators/writers, which offered some explanations and pointed out some of the Easter eggs. The download also includes two new features: “Castle Rock: Blood on the Page” and “Clockwork of Horror.” 

Be sure to watch a couple of minutes into the credits after the final episode, “Romans,” as you get a nice glimpse into what might be in store for the second season Hulu has already committed to. 

Probably the most experienced writer on custom installation in the industry, John Sciacca is co-owner of Custom Theater & Audio in Murrells Inlet, South Carolina, & is known for his writing for such publications as Residential Systems and Sound & Vision. Follow him on Twitter at @SciaccaTweets and at johnsciacca.com.

PICTURE | The video is mainly a palette of muted browns, grays, and cool blues but images are clean and detailed

SOUND | The 5.1-channel DTS-HD audio mix does a wonderful job of keeping dialogue understandable while still delivering a lot of sonic atmospherics that certainly add to the experience when watched on a surround system

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

© 2023 Cineluxe LLC

Review: Midsommar

Midsommar (2019)

review | Midsommar

This arthouse horror film eschews jump scares and plot twists for atmosphere and style

by Dennis Burger
October 14, 2020

One relatively recent trend that warms my dark heart is the reemergence of horror as a legitimate genre of cinema. This isn’t to say that I don’t get a kick out of schlocky B-movie suspense but for most of my adult life, horror movies have been little more than that, leaving legitimate attempts at making serious films in the genre—like Rosemary’s Baby and Kubrick’s The Shining—in the distant past. So to see Jordan Peele’s Get Out, Darren Aronofsky’s Mother!, and Ari Aster’s Hereditary embraced in recent years as art is, if nothing else, a step in the right direction.

Aster’s follow-up to Hereditary, 2019’s Midsommar, keeps the horror-as-art train rolling, not simply due to its gorgeous cinematography, deep reliance on symbolism, or its 148-minute run time, but because it actually has something to say. While Peele used horror for the purposes of societal allegory in Get Out and Aster himself used it to explore familial angst in Hereditary, Midsommar broadens its reach to explore both cultural issues and deeply personal struggles. And it’s the constant tug-of-war between the individual on the one hand and the expectations of the herd on the other that give the film so much of its tension. 

That’s simply one element of what makes the film work, though. In telling the tale of a group of anthropology students (and the girlfriend of one of them, herself a psychology student) as they travel to Sweden to study and document the cultural traditions of an isolated Scandinavian commune, Aster uses personal relationships the way Kubrick used architecture in The Shining. In other words, if you’re paying attention, there’s an internal consistency to it all that’s nonetheless contradictory, which results in a foreboding sense of unease. 

That in itself wouldn’t be worthy of praise but it’s the way Aster and cinematographer Pawel Pogorzelski convey the ties that bind (and the wedges that divide) the characters that makes Midsommar so fascinating. In one early scene, for example, the film uses mirrors brilliantly to convey a sense of othering. The characters viewed directly by the camera? They are the “Us.” Those that can only be seen in reflection? They fall (or move) into “Them” territory. And what’s fascinating here is that the film’s “Us” and “Them” are right opposite of the audience’s “Us” and “Them,” which further builds tension. 

What I appreciate most is that such compositional sleight of hand is almost always employed with such subtlety that it never comes across as a gimmick. Only one scene crosses the line into artsy-for-arty’s-sake territory, and it’s an establishing shot, demarking the transition from one culture into the other, so it’s easily forgiven. 

That scene is far from the only one that could be construed as cinema-for-cinema’s sake. So much of Midsommar is pure audiovisual experience—style as substance, if you will—intended to invoke feeling rather than trigger thought. Perhaps my favorite thing about the film is that it strikes such a perfect balance in alternating between storytelling and tone poetry that it’s nearly two-and-a-half-hour runtime never becomes a slog. 

That’s aided by the fact that it never resorts to jump-scares or twists to keep you hanging on. It telegraphs exactly the direction in which it’s heading and then takes its time getting there, which only adds to the suspense and tension. 

The one big surprise—at least for me—is that Midsommar wasn’t shot on film, but rather captured in a combination of 8K and 4K, and finished in a 4K digital intermediate. Despite this, it boasts a very film-like aesthetic, although the palette is intentionally muted. And Kaleidescape’s 4K HDR presentation is wonderfully true to Midsommar‘s intended look, delivering it with exceptional detail. Far more importantly, the Kaleidescape download doesn’t muck up the background textures the way streaming providers do. Perhaps it’s a result of the resolution at which the movie was shot, but Apple TV’s stream in particular suffers from occasionally messy and noisy textures that serve as a bit of a distraction, whereas the Kaleidescape download maintains its composure from beginning to end, even when the film is at its densest, visually speaking. 

The high dynamic range does little to change the look of the film overall, largely due to that muted palette. When HDR does make itself known, it’s generally in the shadows, especially during those scenes in which a darkened interior is viewed from a sunlit exterior. HDR allows the viewer to see into those shadows without brightening the image as a whole. 

Kaleidescape’s DTS-HD Master Audio 5.1 soundtrack is also true to the film’s theatrical audio mix. You may have seen Midsommar presented in Dolby Atmos on certain streaming platforms, but these Atmos tracks were created using Nugen Audio’s Halo upmixer software, based on the original 5.1. Given my druthers, I’ll take the original mix, thank you very much. It’s unusually aggressive, in a way I normally don’t love, but in this case it absolutely works. 

The soundtrack leans on the surround channels hard, often panning dialogue into them so fully that if your rear speakers aren’t up to the quality of the rest of your system, you’ll likely hear a shift in the quality of the sound. Even if your system is well-designed from front to back, it’s still a disorienting and frankly distracting effect. But that’s the point. The mix rarely goes whole-hog on the surrounds when there’s something crucial happening onscreen. And when it does, it’s because the film wants to you feel disoriented at that moment. 

The only thing missing from Kaleidescape’s download is Aster’s original 171-minute cut, which A24, the film’s distributor, made him trim down for wide theatrical release. Given that the cuts were made simply to cram more butts into seats and not due to content, it’s strange that A24 is so precious with the original edit. In the US, the only ways to see it are via Apple TV (it’s included as an iTunes Extra with the purchase of the film) and by way of an incredibly limited 4K Blu-ray release that’s already fetching six times its original asking price on the secondary market. 

What I wouldn’t give to view that cut of the film in the quality of Kaleidescape’s presentation. Despite its nearly three-hour length, the director’s cut is even better paced and frankly feels like a shorter film. But the improvements over the theatrical cut aren’t so substantial that I would choose Apple TV’s compromised stream over Kaleidescape’s pixel-perfect download.

Dennis Burger is an avid Star Wars scholar, Tolkien fanatic, and Corvette enthusiast who somehow also manages to find time for technological passions including high-end audio, home automation, and video gaming. He lives in the armpit of Alabama with his wife Bethany and their four-legged child Bruno, a 75-pound American Staffordshire Terrier who thinks he’s a Pomeranian.

PICTURE | Kaleidescape’s 4K HDR presentation is wonderfully true to Midsommar‘s intended look, delivering it with exceptional detail

SOUND | The DTS-HD Master Audio 5.1 soundtrack is unusually aggressive but true to the film’s theatrical mix, leaning hard on the surrounds

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

© 2023 Cineluxe LLC

Review: It (2017)

It (2017)

review | It (2017)

related reviews

Sign up for our monthly newsletter
to stay up to date on Cineluxe

This adaptation of the Stephen King novel is a major reworking of the source material but that yields big dividends in its relevance, themes, and atmosphere 

by Dennis Burger
October 20, 2020

Had I known going in just how drastically Andy Muschietti restructured Stephen King’s It when adapting the 1,138-page novel into two movies, I probably never would have given it a chance. In case you’re not familiar with the book, it follows the adventures and tribulations of seven friends known collectively as “The Loser’s Club,” cutting back and forth between their adolescent and adult encounters with a shapeshifting, homicidal cosmic horror who takes the form of a clown known as Pennywise. 

The intercutting between the characters as adults and adolescents is crucial to the plot (not to mention the emotional impact) of the novel, so if you had told me ahead of time that Muschietti shuffled the story like a deck of cards, then laid out the events in chronological order, with the first movie focusing on the story of the Loser’s Club as kids and the second serving as a sequel focusing on their adult experiences, I would have explained to you (probably with as much condescension as I could humanly muster) that such an approach would miss the point of the book entirely.

And although that may be the case, what Muschietti has done is turn this story into two distinct stories, each with its own themes, and each of which—much to my pleasant surprise—works as its own self-contained experience, with a proper beginning, middle, and ending. 

The other big change Muschietti and screenwriter Gary Dauberman made to the source material was an update to the timeline. Rather than starting in 1957, as does the book, It moves the Loser’s Club’s youth to 1989, and also adds a couple of years to their ages. The former change not only allows the cinematic sequel to take place in the present day, but also allows Muschietti to rely on cultural references that will likely be a bit more familiar to modern audiences. The latter change keeps the film from veering too far into exploitative territory and also makes the story somewhat more believable. 

Muschietti and Dauberman also removed some of the cosmic/spiritual aspects of the story that strain credulity to its breaking point, and what we’re left with is a movie that, in many ways, sort of feels like a scary, R-rated riff on The Goonies. There are also shades of Stranger Things here and there (and not merely because Finn Wolfhard, that series’ star, plays a key role in the film). 

Despite the comparisons, It manages to carve out its own identity. A lot of the credit for that goes to Bill Skarsgård, whose performance as Pennywise is unforgettable. Rather than borrow anything from Tim Curry, who played the role first in ABC’s two-part miniseries adaptation from 1990, Skarsgård makes the character his own, bringing a wholly alien physicality to the performance that makes one thing abundantly clear from the giddy-up: This isn’t your garden-variety sewer-dwelling murder-clown we’re dealing with here.

The look of the film also contributes to the sort of distinctive and effective personality lacking in so many of today’s horror movies. Shot on ArriRaw in a combination of 2.8K and 3.4K, the movie has a rich and gorgeous palette that makes even its most pedestrian scenes visually engaging. What’s more, you’d never know from looking at the imagery’s crisp edges, luscious textures, and fine detail that it was finished in a 2K digital intermediate. It is further proof that this sort of thing just doesn’t matter as much as some people would have you believe. The important thing is that Kaleidescape’s download is above reproach in terms of definition and detail.

HDR is also put to good use, not only in delivering the movie’s rich colors but also in allowing a good bit of extra depth in the shadows. Make no mistake about it—It is an incredibly dark film—one that should be viewed in a completely light-controlled room. But even with the lights out, the Blu-ray release made portions so inscrutably dark that it was difficult to tell what was going on at all. The 4K HDR transfer rectifies that at least enough to make even the darkest scenes discernible. Long story short, it may come from a 2K DI, but the 4K HDR release of It—at least as presented by Kaleidescape—is amazing video demo material, and comes darn close to being a reference-quality transfer. 

The Dolby TrueHD Atmos is also everything you would expect the soundtrack for a movie like this to be. Directional sound effects are aggressive as hell, the bass is absolutely britches-leg-flapping, and the overall creepy ambiance of the movie is handled fantastically by the soundtrack. My only real beef is that voices occasionally get lost in the mix. Don’t blame your center speaker if you find some of the dialogue a bit unintelligible—instead blame the sound engineers. That said, this problem isn’t nearly so bad here as it has been in the past few Chris Nolan films.

As for the movie itself, my only real beef is that it feels a little short. An odd statement to make about a 135-minute horror flick, I know, but It is so packed with characters, most of whom have their own compelling individual storylines distinct from the group dynamic, that it just whizzes by. A few extra minutes’ worth of runtime would have allowed Muschietti to flesh out a couple of characters that seem underserved here. Stanley Uris, for example—played wonderfully by the young Wyatt Oleff—serves such a minor role in the overall story that he could have just as easily been written out of the screenplay and it hardly would have been the biggest departure from the novel. The relationship between Eddie Kaspbrak and his mother is also a bit undeveloped, leaving the resolution of their storyline feeling somewhat unsatisfying.

Those quibbles aside, It is a surprisingly good horror movie that thankfully relies more on scares than gross-outs to keep you glued to the screen and huddled under your blanket. Don’t go into it expecting a faithful adaptation of Stephen King’s book (although, given how poorly that one has aged, that’s probably a good thing) but do go in expecting a very satisfying reinterpretation of parts of the novel—one that absolutely works on its own terms, whether you have any intention of watching the sequel or not.

Dennis Burger is an avid Star Wars scholar, Tolkien fanatic, and Corvette enthusiast who somehow also manages to find time for technological passions including high-end audio, home automation, and video gaming. He lives in the armpit of Alabama with his wife Bethany and their four-legged child Bruno, a 75-pound American Staffordshire Terrier who thinks he’s a Pomeranian.

PICTURE | Above reproach in terms of definition and detail, the Kaleidescape presentation of the 4K HDR release is amazing video demo material and comes darn close to being a reference-quality transfer

SOUND | Directional sound effects in the Atmos mix are aggressive as hell, the bass is absolutely pants-leg-flapping, and the overall creepy ambiance of the movie is handled fantastically

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

© 2023 Cineluxe LLC

Scroll to top

sign up for our newsletter

receive a monthly recap of everything that’s new on Cineluxe